LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

LNZ Cherkasy play Kudrivka in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match date is 29 November 2025 at 14:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

LNZ Cherkasy: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Kudrivka: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

LNZ Cherkasy scores 1.30 and concedes 0.57 goals per match. Kudrivka scores 1.07 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: LNZ Cherkasy 20%, Kudrivka 60%. Over 2.5: LNZ Cherkasy 27%, Kudrivka 50%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

LNZ Cherkasy has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.12. LNZ Cherkasy: 13.0 shots per match, Kudrivka: 10.1.

Match halves

LNZ Cherkasy: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.77. Kudrivka: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

LNZ Cherkasy: 31-45+ (10 goals). Kudrivka: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
14Shots8
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
4Shots on target0
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.55xG0.9
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3Corners4
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
54Dangerous attacks54
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
21Fouls15
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1Cards2
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match1.07
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.57Goals conceded / match1.6
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
45%Average possession49%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
4.27Shots on target / match2.83
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.97Shots per match10.1
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
4.27Shots on target2.83
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
10%Shot conversion10.6%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
45%Possession49%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.5xG for1.12
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.99xG against1.58
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Shooting quality

LNZ Cherkasy: BalancedKudrivka: Balanced
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
Accuracy (shots on target)33%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

LNZ Cherkasy is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 1.4 pts / match - Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy
DDWLW
Season result split
60% W20% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-6-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 0.73BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Kudrivka
DLWWL
Season result split
23% W23% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-16
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

LNZ Cherkasy is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 1.07 goals / match - Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy is 181% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.57 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 1.6 goals / match - Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy scoring profile: very strong

LNZ Cherkasy scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Kudrivka keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

Kudrivka scoring profile: mixed

Kudrivka scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while LNZ Cherkasy keeps a clean sheet in 67% (20 of 30 matches).

39Goals scored (season)32
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
17Goals conceded (season)48
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.87Average goals in match2.67
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3Goals scored (last 5)6
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal70%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
40%2 goals30%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
13%3 goals7%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3%4 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal87%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
13%2 goals47%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
7%3 goals20%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3%4 goals7%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time7%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
30%Scored in both halves7%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0%BTTS - last 560%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LNZ Cherkasy is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 1 pts / match - Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy - half-time state
43% leading40% draw17% trailing
Kudrivka - half-time state
27% leading20% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.43
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.23
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
77%Clean sheet before half-time40%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
50%No goal before half-time73%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)1.23
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.43
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
80%Clean sheet after half-time47%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
47%No goal after half-time50%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy - second-half results

47% W43% R10% P
51
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kudrivka - second-half results

30% W33% R37% P
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

LNZ Cherkasy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kudrivka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

LNZ Cherkasy
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
4
1
16-30
10
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
9
2
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Kudrivka
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
1
10
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
8
46-60
5
3
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

LNZ Cherkasy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Kudrivka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

LNZ CherkasyLigaKudrivka
Average goals in match 1.872.57 2.67
Both teams scored 20%43% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%47% 50%
Clean sheets 67%33% 13%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 80%
Goal after half-time 63%76% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: LNZ Cherkasy 0 - 0 - 1 Kudrivka. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished LNZ Cherkasy 1:0 Kudrivka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?

LNZ Cherkasy score 1.30 goals per game on average and Kudrivka 1.07. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 20% of LNZ Cherkasy's matches and 60% of Kudrivka's.

What form are LNZ Cherkasy and Kudrivka in?

Over the last 5 games LNZ Cherkasy have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kudrivka 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?

The statistical background for LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.