Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

LNZ Cherkasy vs Shakhtar Donetsk: match statistics

LNZ Cherkasy vs Shakhtar Donetsk: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

LNZ Cherkasy played Shakhtar Donetsk in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

LNZ Cherkasy: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Shakhtar Donetsk: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

LNZ Cherkasy scores 1.50 and concedes 0.55 goals per match. Shakhtar Donetsk scores 2.43 and concedes 0.57. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: LNZ Cherkasy 18%, Shakhtar Donetsk 29%. Over 2.5: LNZ Cherkasy 32%, Shakhtar Donetsk 52%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Shakhtar Donetsk has higher xG: 2.08 vs 1.55. LNZ Cherkasy: 13.4 shots per match, Shakhtar Donetsk: 16.7.

Match halves

LNZ Cherkasy: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.91. Shakhtar Donetsk: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.57.

Goals by minute

LNZ Cherkasy: 31-45+ (9 goals). Shakhtar Donetsk: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is Shakhtar Donetsk due to a clear offensive advantage: 51 goals scored this season versus 33 for LNZ and an average of 2.0 goals per away match compared to 1.09 for the hosts. The visitors register 5.89 shots on target per match with a shot conversion rate of 13% versus 4.73 and 8% for LNZ, and xG 1.85 vs 1.68 confirms higher quality chances created by Shakhtar. LNZ, however, has a strong home defence — just 0.55 goals conceded on average and 73% clean sheets, and in the last 5 matches a record of 4 wins and 1 draw (averaging 2.6 points per match). Shakhtar also rarely concedes away (0.44 goals conceded and 78% clean sheets) and have only 1 loss this season alongside 15 wins, which underlines the visitors’ class. Considering the possession advantage 68% vs 47%, higher quantity and quality of shots and better conversion, I predict an away win, with a moderate probability of a draw due to the hosts’ solid defence.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal against BTTS is the prevalence of clean sheets: LNZ has 67% of matches without conceding (0.67 goals conceded per game on average), and Shakhtar 78% (0.44), which significantly reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Seasonal BTTS percentages are also low: LNZ 33% and Shakhtar 22% versus a league average of 41%, meaning both teams allow BTTS less often than average. In the last 5 matches both sides scored a lot of goals (LNZ 10 goals, 2.0 avg; Shakhtar 11 goals, 2.2 avg), but LNZ conceded only 1 goal and Shakhtar 3, and recent BTTS in the last 5 were only 20% and 40% — indicating dominance of one-sided matches. The xG model gives a higher theoretical scenario (expected goals estimate around 1.48 for the home side and 1.31 for the away when comparing xG 2.25 vs 0.71 and 1.85 vs 0.77, which would imply ~57% for BTTS), but considering realistic clean sheet rates of 67–78% and seasonal BTTS 33%/22%, it is more credible to back No Goal. Therefore I propose 70% for "no" and 30% for "BTTS - Yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seasonal statistics point to a goals game: LNZ score an average of 2.75 goals at home, while Shakhtar score 2.00 on the road with average concessions of 0.67 (LNZ) and 0.44 (Shakhtar). A simple model combining goals scored and conceded yields expected ~1.60 goals for the home side ((2.75+0.44)/2=1.60) and ~1.33 for the away side ((2.00+0.67)/2=1.33), i.e. a total of ~2.93 goals. xG also confirms an offensive profile: home xG 2.25 versus xG against Shakhtar 0.71 → ~1.48, and away xG 1.85 versus xG against LNZ 0.77 → ~1.31, totaling in the ~2.79–2.93 expected goals range. LNZ have Over 2.5 in 67% of home matches, and Shakhtar recorded Over 2.5 in 80% of their last 5 outings; both teams have scored 10 and 11 goals respectively in their last 5 games (21 combined), which strengthens the goals signal. Based on this, the strongest and most probable selection is Over 1.5 (clear probability edge given total expected goals ~2.9).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

LNZ Cherkasy hold advantages in key metrics: they score an average of 2.75 goals per match versus Shakhtar’s 2.00, the hosts’ xG is 2.25 compared to the visitors’ 1.85, and LNZ’s seasonal win rate is 83% versus Shakhtar’s 56%. At half-time the hosts led in 6 matches (50%), half-time draws occur in 33% of games, and the average goals by half-time are 0.92 for LNZ versus 0.78 for the visitors. In the second half LNZ are particularly dangerous: they average 1.83 goals in second halves compared to Shakhtar’s 1.22 and have scored 13 goals between the 76th and 90th minutes versus 5 for the visitors, indicating a strong finish. Given that the hosts lead at the break in 50% of matches, win 83% of their games over the season and have a clear advantage in second halves, the strongest HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (~40%), with an alternative of X/1 (~20%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

32Possession (%)68
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
7Shots20
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
2Shots on target6
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0.91xG1.99
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
7Corners4
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
45Dangerous attacks44
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
9Fouls7
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0Cards2
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
1.5Goals scored / match2.43
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0.55Goals conceded / match0.57
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
45%Average possession67%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
4.5Shots on target / match6.48
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.36Shots per match16.67
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
4.5Shots on target6.48
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
11.2%Shot conversion14.6%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
45%Possession67%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
1.55xG for2.08
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
1.01xG against0.75
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

Shooting quality

LNZ Cherkasy: BalancedShakhtar Donetsk: Dominant
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shakhtar Donetsk is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 3 pts / match - Shakhtar Donetsk

LNZ Cherkasy
LWWWW
Season result split
73% W9% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-2-4
2.27 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Shakhtar Donetsk
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
71% W24% D5% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-1
2.38 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 2.11Opponent xG: 0.49BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shakhtar Donetsk is 62% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 2.43 goals / match - Shakhtar Donetsk

LNZ Cherkasy scoring profile: mixed

LNZ Cherkasy scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Shakhtar Donetsk keeps a clean sheet in 71% (15 of 21 matches).

Shakhtar Donetsk scoring profile: mixed

Shakhtar Donetsk scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while LNZ Cherkasy keeps a clean sheet in 73% (16 of 22 matches).

33Goals scored (season)51
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
12Goals conceded (season)12
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
2.05Average goals in match3
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
11Goals scored (last 5)9
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
4Goals conceded (last 5)0
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal90%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
45%2 goals57%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
18%3 goals43%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
5%4 goals24%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

How often they concede at least...

27%1 goal29%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
14%2 goals14%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
9%3 goals10%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
5%4 goals5%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time10%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0%BTTS in both halves5%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
36%Scored in both halves48%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
40%BTTS - last 50%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LNZ Cherkasy - half-time state
55% leading27% draw18% trailing
Shakhtar Donetsk - half-time state
52% leading38% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.91Points per match (1st half)1.95
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.86
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.19
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0.86Average goals (1st half)1.05
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
77%Clean sheet before half-time86%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
41%No goal before half-time43%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)2.29
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)1.57
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
0.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.95
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
82%Clean sheet after half-time76%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk
41%No goal after half-time19%
LNZ CherkasyShakhtar Donetsk

LNZ Cherkasy - second-half results

55% W36% D9% L
42
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shakhtar Donetsk - second-half results

71% W14% D14% L
41
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+25
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

LNZ Cherkasy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.41.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-1+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Shakhtar Donetsk - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.403.00
Goals scored / match0.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.21.6
1 goal20%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference+1+8
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

LNZ Cherkasy
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
1
16-30
9
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
8
1
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Shakhtar Donetsk
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
6
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
8
2
46-60
7
2
61-75
18
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.53
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
24%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+98%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

LNZ Cherkasy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Shakhtar Donetsk

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
191%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

LNZ CherkasyLigaShakhtar Donetsk
Average goals in match 2.052.55 3.00
Both teams scored 18%41% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%46% 52%
Clean sheets 73%35% 71%
Goal before half-time 77%69% 62%
Goal after half-time 68%75% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LNZ CherkasyGoalArtur Ryabov
  2. Shakhtar DonetskGoalValerii Bondar
  3. Shakhtar DonetskGoalEguinaldo de Sousa LemosAssist: Dmytro Riznyk
  4. LNZ CherkasyGoalMark Assinor
  5. Shakhtar DonetskSubstitutionOn: Oleh OcheretkoOff: Pedro Victor Delmino da Silva
  6. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Artur MykytyshynOff: Mark Assinor
  7. Shakhtar DonetskSubstitutionOn: Newertton Martins da SilvaOff: Artem Bondarenko
  8. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Ehor TverdokhlibOff: Danylo Kravchuk
  9. Shakhtar DonetskSubstitutionOn: Mykola MatviyenkoOff: Eguinaldo de Sousa Lemos
  10. Shakhtar DonetskYellow cardAlisson Santana Lopes da Fonseca
  11. Shakhtar DonetskSubstitutionOn: Prosper Soporuchi ObahOff: Alisson Santana Lopes da Fonseca
  12. Shakhtar DonetskYellow cardValerii Bondar

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: LNZ Cherkasy 1 - 0 - 0 Shakhtar Donetsk. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Shakhtar Donetsk
1 : 4
LNZ Cherkasy FC

FAQ

What was the result of LNZ Cherkasy vs Shakhtar Donetsk?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished LNZ Cherkasy 2:2 Shakhtar Donetsk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before LNZ Cherkasy vs Shakhtar Donetsk?

LNZ Cherkasy score 1.50 goals per game on average and Shakhtar Donetsk 2.43. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 18% of LNZ Cherkasy's matches and 29% of Shakhtar Donetsk's.

What form are LNZ Cherkasy and Shakhtar Donetsk in?

Over the last 5 games LNZ Cherkasy have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Shakhtar Donetsk 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LNZ Cherkasy vs Shakhtar Donetsk?

The statistical background for LNZ Cherkasy vs Shakhtar Donetsk — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.