Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

Lokeren-Temse vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

Lokeren-Temse crest
Lokeren-Temse
1 : 1half-time 0:0
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing

Lokeren-Temse vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lokeren-Temse play RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 10 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Lokeren-Temse: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. RFC Seraing: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lokeren-Temse scores 1.50 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 1.16 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lokeren-Temse 75%, RFC Seraing 50%. Over 2.5: Lokeren-Temse 53%, RFC Seraing 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Lokeren-Temse has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.37. Lokeren-Temse: 13.0 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 11.8.

Match halves

Lokeren-Temse: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.91. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Lokeren-Temse: 76-90+ (13 goals). RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Lokeren-Temse are the favorites in this fixture: at home they average 1.8 goals per match with an average xG of 1.51 and a 14% conversion rate, whereas RFC Seraing on the road score only 0.8 goals with an xG of 1.38 and a 6% conversion. The hosts also record higher possession (52% vs 42%) and create more chances — 12.87 shots and 4.27 on target per home match versus 12.4 shots and 4.2 on target for the visitors. Seraing, however, show better recent form over the last five games: 3 wins and 2 draws, 12 goals scored and an average of 2.2 points per game, while Lokeren have 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses, 11 goals and 1.4 points per game in the same period. Defensively Seraing are more compact away (1.33 goals conceded on average and 40% clean sheets) than Lokeren at home (1.6 goals conceded and 13% clean sheets), which reduces the likelihood of a large home-margin win. Considering Lokeren’s clearly superior home efficiency (14% vs 6%), the fact that Seraing fail to score in 53% of their away matches, and Lokeren’s home goal difference of +3 versus Seraing’s -8 on the road, I assign a 55% probability to the hosts, 25% to a draw and 20% to an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
15Shots6
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
5Shots on target4
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
1.64xG0.86
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
6Corners1
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
46Dangerous attacks27
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
9Fouls20
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
3Cards6
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
1.5Goals scored / match1.16
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
1.41Goals conceded / match1.38
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
53%Average possession41%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
4.28Shots on target / match4
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.97Shots per match11.75
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
4.28Shots on target4
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
11.6%Shot conversion9.8%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
53%Possession41%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
1.5xG for1.37
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
1.47xG against1.48
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

Lokeren-Temse: BalancedRFC Seraing: Balanced
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lokeren-Temse is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse · 1.2 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Lokeren-Temse
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-10
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
RFC Seraing
DDWDL
Season result split
25% W34% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-13
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-7-6
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lokeren-Temse is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse · 1.16 goals / match - RFC Seraing

Lokeren-Temse scoring profile: very strong

Lokeren-Temse scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: very strong

RFC Seraing scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while Lokeren-Temse keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).

48Goals scored (season)37
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
45Goals conceded (season)44
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
2.91Average goals in match2.53
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
12Goals scored (last 5)6
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal66%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
44%2 goals31%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
16%3 goals13%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
6%4 goals6%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal72%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
38%2 goals47%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
16%3 goals13%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
0%4 goals3%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time16%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
13%BTTS in both halves3%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
25%Scored in both halves19%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
100%BTTS - last 560%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lokeren-Temse is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse · 0.91 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Lokeren-Temse - half-time state
22% leading44% draw34% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
13% leading53% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)0.91
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.34
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
1.25Average goals (1st half)0.97
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
41%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
59%No goal before half-time72%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.41
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.66
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
1.66Average goals (2nd half)1.47
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
38%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing
31%No goal after half-time44%
Lokeren-TemseRFC Seraing

Lokeren-Temse - second-half results

28% W53% R19% P
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lokeren-Temse - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lokeren-Temse
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
2
7
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
9
46-60
10
4
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
6
16-30
3
9
31-45
9
7
46-60
7
5
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lokeren-Temse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lokeren-TemseLigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match 2.912.84 2.53
Both teams scored 75%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%54% 50%
Clean sheets 13%26% 28%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 56%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lokeren-Temse 0 - 1 - 0 RFC Seraing. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

RFC Seraing
1 : 1
KSC Lokeren-Temse

FAQ

What was the result of Lokeren-Temse vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished Lokeren-Temse 1:1 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lokeren-Temse vs RFC Seraing?

Lokeren-Temse score 1.50 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.16. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Lokeren-Temse's matches and 50% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are Lokeren-Temse and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games Lokeren-Temse have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lokeren-Temse vs RFC Seraing?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lokeren-Temse vs RFC Seraing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.