Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: match statistics
Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lommel United played Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Lommel United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Club Brugge II: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lommel United scores 1.93 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Club Brugge II scores 1.03 and concedes 1.77. League average: 2.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lommel United 63%, Club Brugge II 58%. Over 2.5: Lommel United 60%, Club Brugge II 58%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Lommel United has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.33. Lommel United: 15.4 shots per match, Club Brugge II: 11.7.
Match halves
Lommel United: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 1.10. Club Brugge II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
Lommel United: 76-90+ (15 goals). Club Brugge II: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Lommel United): they have a 53% home win rate and sit 4th in the table, while Club Brugge II have only a 7% away win rate and are 16th. Offensively Lommel average 1.93 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.86 and 5.93 shots on target per game, whereas Club Brugge II score 1.20 goals away with xG 1.38 and 3.33 shots on target. Defensively the hosts concede 1.27 goals per home match versus 1.8 conceded by the visitors away; this season the visitors have let in 55 goals compared to the hosts’ 43, giving Lommel a clear defensive edge. Trends reinforce the home advantage: in the last 5 matches Lommel have scored 9 goals and recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss with an average 1.6 points per game, while Club Brugge II have scored 5 goals, have no wins in their last 5 and average 0.4 points per game. Considering better quality of chances (xG 1.86 vs 1.38), higher share of shots on target and greater conversion (12% vs 10%), and a lower share of goalless home matches for the hosts (13% vs 20%), I assess probabilities as: home 70%, draw 20%, away 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "both teams to score" scenario looks more likely: Club Brugge II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 73% versus Lommel's 44%, while the league average BTTS is 54%. In Lommel's last 5 matches BTTS is 80%, they average 1.8 goals and generate xG 1.98 per game, whereas Club Brugge II in their last five matches concede on average 1.6 goals and have xG against of 2.35, indicating clear chances created and allowed by both sides. Season-long both teams concede heavily: Lommel on average 1.75 goals per match, Club Brugge II 1.8 goals, and the clean sheet expected rate is only 13% for both teams, which reduces the likelihood of "No Goal". Additionally, hosts average 4.5 shots on target vs 3.33 for the visitors, have seasonal xG 1.29 versus Club's 1.38, and despite lower finishing efficiency (7% vs 10%) the recent xG and chances conceded by the visitors increase the chance of goal exchange. On this basis I prioritize the BTTS - Yes option with a 70% probability.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The calculated expected goals are 1.53 for Lommel (average of xG attack 1.29 and opponent xG defense 1.77) and 1.62 for Club Brugge II (average of xG attack 1.38 and opponent xG defense 1.85), giving a total of 3.15 expected goals. The 3.15 total exceeds the league average of 2.82, and season-long over 1.5 rates are 75% for Lommel and 80% for Club Brugge II, supporting a high probability for Over 1.5 (~82%). Club Brugge II have 73% of matches over 2.5 goals, Lommel 44%; additionally, in the last 5 matches Lommel scored 9 goals (1.8 average) with xG 1.98, which increases the probability for Over 2.5 (≈61%). Shot statistics show 4.5 on-target for Lommel and 3.33 for Club Brugge II with conversion rates of 7% vs 10%, indicating moderate finishing but sufficient potential for at least 2–3 goals. Therefore I recommend the Over 1.5 line as the strongest signal (highest probability), while Over 2.5 is a justified secondary option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of a draw at the break and a home win after the match (X/1). I expect a draw at the break because the home side averages 0.25 goals by half-time versus 0.27 for the away side; the home team led at the break in 3 matches (19%) while the visitors only in 1 (7%); and the hosts have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 56% of games — together these factors increase the probability of a stalemate at the break (hosts draw at half-time in 38% of matches, visitors in 47%). After the break I anticipate scoring activity — the hosts have 81% of matches with at least one goal after the interval, the visitors 80% — and in the last five matches the hosts average 1.6 points per game versus 0.4 for the visitors, indicating Lommel’s superiority in second halves. Additionally, the hosts register more shots on target (4.5 versus 3.33) and have comparable xG (1.29 versus 1.38), so the home team has more opportunities and conditions to turn the score around after half-time. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to the X/1 scenario, with a lower likelihood for an all-match draw or an away win, as the visitors have only 7% wins this season and average 0.4 points in their last five matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lommel United | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lommel United is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Lommel United · 0.4 pts / match - Club Brugge II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lommel United is 87% better for: goals scored per match.
1.93 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.03 goals / match - Club Brugge II
Lommel United is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.77 goals / match - Club Brugge II
Lommel United scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 matches).
Club Brugge II scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lommel United
Over / Under - Club Brugge II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lommel United is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Lommel United · 0.81 pts / match - Club Brugge II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lommel United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Club Brugge II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lommel United
Club Brugge II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Lommel United | Liga | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.37 | 2.83 | • 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 53% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Lommel United 1 - 0 - 0 Club Brugge II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?
The First Division B match finished Lommel United 0:1 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?
Lommel United score 1.93 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 1.03. The First Division B average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Lommel United's matches and 58% of Club Brugge II's.
What form are Lommel United and Club Brugge II in?
Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Club Brugge II 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


