Belgium - First Division BData current as of 12 September 2026

Lommel United vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

Lommel United crest
Lommel United
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
155%(2.74)
X25%(3.10)
220%(2.35)

Lommel United showcases impressive home form with a 56% win rate and an average of 2.11 goals per match at home, making them a formidable opponent on their own ground. The hosts have won 4 out of their last 5 matches overall, scoring 11 goals, which highlights their excellent attacking form. Patro Eisden, despite a solid 40% away win rate, struggles with offensive efficiency – averaging only 1.4 goals per away match and failing to score in as many as 40% of their games. Lommel's key advantages are ball possession (55% vs 37%) and a higher shot conversion rate (13% vs 8%), which, combined with home support, should tip the scales in their favor. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.85 vs 1.82 for the visitors away), although the margin is narrow, suggesting a potentially tight match with a chance of a draw.

Lommel United vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lommel United played Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 31 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Lommel United: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Patro Eisden: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lommel United scores 2.05 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.29 and concedes 0.90. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lommel United 62%, Patro Eisden 43%. Over 2.5: Lommel United 67%, Patro Eisden 38%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.72. Lommel United: 14.9 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 16.0.

Match halves

Lommel United: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.19. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Lommel United: 76-90+ (12 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lommel United showcases impressive home form with a 56% win rate and an average of 2.11 goals per match at home, making them a formidable opponent on their own ground. The hosts have won 4 out of their last 5 matches overall, scoring 11 goals, which highlights their excellent attacking form. Patro Eisden, despite a solid 40% away win rate, struggles with offensive efficiency – averaging only 1.4 goals per away match and failing to score in as many as 40% of their games. Lommel's key advantages are ball possession (55% vs 37%) and a higher shot conversion rate (13% vs 8%), which, combined with home support, should tip the scales in their favor. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.85 vs 1.82 for the visitors away), although the margin is narrow, suggesting a potentially tight match with a chance of a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
14Shots9
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
3Shots on target3
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1.86xG1.39
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
7Corners2
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
108Dangerous attacks85
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
14Fouls18
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1Cards3
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
2.05Goals scored / match1.29
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1.48Goals conceded / match0.9
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
55%Average possession37%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
6Shots on target / match5.33
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.9Shots per match16
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
6Shots on target5.33
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
13.7%Shot conversion8%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
55%Possession37%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1.72xG for1.73
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1.4xG against1.02
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

Lommel United: DominantPatro Eisden: Attacking
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)40%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lommel United is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Lommel United · 2 pts / match - Patro Eisden

Lommel United
WWWWL
Season result split
52% W24% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-5
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Patro Eisden
LDWWW
Season result split
52% W24% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-5
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lommel United is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

2.05 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.29 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - Lommel United · 0.9 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Lommel United scoring profile: very strong

Lommel United scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

43Goals scored (season)27
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
31Goals conceded (season)19
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
3.52Average goals in match2.19
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
11Goals scored (last 5)7
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal67%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
76%2 goals43%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
33%3 goals10%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
10%4 goals10%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal62%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
48%2 goals29%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
19%3 goals0%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
10%4 goals0%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time14%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
19%BTTS in both halves5%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
48%Scored in both halves19%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
60%BTTS - last 540%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Lommel United · 1.48 pts / match - Patro Eisden

Lommel United - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
33% leading48% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.48
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1.62Average goals (1st half)0.9
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
43%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
38%No goal before half-time62%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

1.76Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1.19Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
1.9Average goals (2nd half)1.29
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden
29%No goal after half-time52%
Lommel UnitedPatro Eisden

Lommel United - second-half results

48% W33% D19% L
29
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

33% W38% D29% L
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lommel United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match2.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lommel United
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
8
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
3
61-75
12
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
1
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lommel United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lommel UnitedLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 3.522.73 2.19
Both teams scored 62%52% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%51% 38%
Clean sheets 29%28% 38%
Goal before half-time 86%71% 57%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lommel UnitedGoalRalf SeuntjensAssist: Tom Reyners
  2. Lommel UnitedYellow cardJason van Duiven
  3. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Zalán VancsaOff: Ralf Seuntjens
  4. Patro EisdenGoalRadja Nainggolan
  5. Patro EisdenYellow cardKéres Masangu
  6. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Mohamed Salah El BoukammiriOff: Tom Reyners
  7. Patro EisdenYellow cardDenys Prychynenko
  8. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Ilyas LefrancqOff: Amir Rais
  9. Patro EisdenYellow cardKjetil Borry
  10. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Nicolas RommensOff: Lautaro López

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Michiel AllaertsMatches officiated: 11
5.36Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins27%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lommel United 1 - 0 - 0 Patro Eisden. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
0 : 2
Lommel United

FAQ

What was the result of Lommel United vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished Lommel United 1:1 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs Patro Eisden?

Lommel United score 2.05 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.29. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Lommel United's matches and 43% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are Lommel United and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Patro Eisden 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs Patro Eisden?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.