Belgium - First Division BData current as of 12 September 2026

Lommel United vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

Lommel United crest
Lommel United
0 : 1half-time 0:0
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing
165%(1.60)
X22%(3.80)
213%(4.75)

Lommel United displays significantly better form and statistics than RFC Seraing. The hosts occupy 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 13 wins, while the visitors are in 15th position with only 4 wins this season. In home matches, Lommel has a 55% win rate and averages 2 goals per game, achieving a positive goal difference of +8. RFC Seraing wins only 8% of their away matches, has a negative goal difference of -11, and fails to score in as many as 58% of their games. Additionally, the hosts boast much better offensive statistics (49 goals this season vs 22) and a higher average xG (1.85 vs 1.39), which confirms their qualitative superiority. The form of both teams in the last 5 matches also favors Lommel United (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses vs 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses).

Lommel United vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lommel United played RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Lommel United: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. RFC Seraing: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lommel United scores 1.96 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 0.92 and concedes 1.54. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lommel United 60%, RFC Seraing 50%. Over 2.5: Lommel United 60%, RFC Seraing 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Lommel United has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.39. Lommel United: 14.9 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 12.0.

Match halves

Lommel United: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.08. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Lommel United: 76-90+ (13 goals). RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lommel United displays significantly better form and statistics than RFC Seraing. The hosts occupy 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 13 wins, while the visitors are in 15th position with only 4 wins this season. In home matches, Lommel has a 55% win rate and averages 2 goals per game, achieving a positive goal difference of +8. RFC Seraing wins only 8% of their away matches, has a negative goal difference of -11, and fails to score in as many as 58% of their games. Additionally, the hosts boast much better offensive statistics (49 goals this season vs 22) and a higher average xG (1.85 vs 1.39), which confirms their qualitative superiority. The form of both teams in the last 5 matches also favors Lommel United (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses vs 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses).

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

72Possession (%)28
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
20Shots4
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
9Shots on target3
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
2.49xG0.7
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
8Corners5
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
83Dangerous attacks32
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
11Fouls11
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1Cards3
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1.96Goals scored / match0.92
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1.44Goals conceded / match1.54
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
55%Average possession40%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
5.92Shots on target / match3.67
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.92Shots per match12.04
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
5.92Shots on target3.67
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
13.1%Shot conversion7.6%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
55%Possession40%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1.72xG for1.39
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1.4xG against1.49
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

Lommel United: DominantRFC Seraing: Balanced
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)40%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lommel United is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Lommel United · 0.8 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Lommel United
LDLWW
Season result split
52% W24% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-6
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
RFC Seraing
DLLWL
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-12
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lommel United is 113% better for: goals scored per match.

1.96 goals / match - Lommel United · 0.92 goals / match - RFC Seraing

Lommel United is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.44 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.54 goals / match - RFC Seraing

Lommel United scoring profile: very strong

Lommel United scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

49Goals scored (season)22
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
36Goals conceded (season)37
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
3.4Average goals in match2.46
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
6Goals scored (last 5)2
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal58%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
72%2 goals25%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
32%3 goals8%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
8%4 goals0%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal79%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
48%2 goals50%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
16%3 goals17%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
8%4 goals4%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time21%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
16%BTTS in both halves4%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
44%Scored in both halves13%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
40%BTTS - last 520%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lommel United is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Lommel United · 0.67 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Lommel United - half-time state
40% leading36% draw24% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
4% leading54% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)0.67
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1.52Average goals (1st half)1
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
52%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
36%No goal before half-time75%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
48%Clean sheet after half-time54%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing
36%No goal after half-time54%
Lommel UnitedRFC Seraing

Lommel United - second-half results

40% W36% D24% L
39
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

25% W42% D33% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding425%

Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lommel United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.40
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.01.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+4-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lommel United
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
9
5
16-30
10
8
31-45
9
9
46-60
5
5
61-75
13
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
1
6
16-30
2
8
31-45
4
4
46-60
5
4
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lommel United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lommel UnitedLigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match 3.402.78 2.46
Both teams scored 60%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%51% 50%
Clean sheets 28%26% 21%
Goal before half-time 84%72% 58%
Goal after half-time 80%78% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RFC SeraingYellow cardEmmanuel Mutela Tshimbalanga
  2. Lommel UnitedYellow cardHenry Oware Oware
  3. RFC SeraingYellow cardBassim Boukteb
  4. RFC SeraingYellow cardBassim Boukteb
  5. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Abdoulaye Agne BaOff: Akpa Chukwu Hemsley
  6. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Nabil Bouchentouf IdrissOff: Matthieu Muland Kayij
  7. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Zalán VancsaOff: Robin van Duiven
  8. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Djibril DiarraOff: Édouard Soumah-Abbad
  9. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Joey PelupessyOff: Nicolas Rommens

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Tom StevensMatches officiated: 15
4.13Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins0%Draws53%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lommel United 1 - 0 - 0 RFC Seraing. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

RFC Seraing
2 : 3
Lommel United

FAQ

What was the result of Lommel United vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished Lommel United 0:1 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs RFC Seraing?

Lommel United score 1.96 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 0.92. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Lommel United's matches and 50% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are Lommel United and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs RFC Seraing?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lommel United vs RFC Seraing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.