Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of 16 October 2026

Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki: match statistics

Lomza crest
Lomza
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Lechia T. Mazowiecki crest
Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lomza played Lechia T. Mazowiecki in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Lomza: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lomza scores 2.23 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores 2.08 and concedes 1.58. League average: 3.39 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lomza 46%, Lechia T. Mazowiecki 77%. Over 2.5: Lomza 58%, Lechia T. Mazowiecki 69%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Lomza has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.69. Lomza: 10.3 shots per match, Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 11.2.

Match halves

Lomza: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.42. Lechia T. Mazowiecki: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Lomza: 76-90+ (16 goals). Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.39 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lomza are the favorites: they sit 3rd with 16 wins, 4 draws and 6 losses this season, while Lechia have 11 wins, 5 draws and 10 losses. At home Lomza average 2.62 goals scored and have xG 1.83 with 1.00 goals conceded on average, whereas Lechia away score 1.92 (xG 1.49) and concede 1.77 per match. The hosts register more shots on target (6.67 vs 4.78), convert chances better (18% vs 15%), maintain higher possession (56% vs 51%) and have 46% clean sheets at home versus 15% for the visitors. However, Lechia show better form over the last five matches: 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss, 10 goals scored and 2.0 points per game compared to Lomza’s 7 goals and 1.2 points, which narrows the home advantage. Considering Lomza’s seasonal defensive superiority (25 goals conceded vs 41) and 69% home win rate versus the visitors’ 46% win rate, I forecast a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS (Both Teams To Score) scenario appears more likely: home side records BTTS 85% this season and visitors 69%, both above the league average of 63%. Lomża averages 2.23 goals scored and concedes 1.38 per match, while Lechia averages 1.92 scored and 1.77 conceded, indicating both teams regularly feature on the scoresheet. xG analysis shows the home team generates 1.80 xG while conceding 1.65 xG to Lechia, and Lechia posts 1.49 xG while conceding 1.51 xG to Lomża, supporting a goals exchange. Last 5 matches give mixed signals: Lomża had only 20% BTTS (7 scored and 5 conceded; averages 1.4 and 1.0), while Lechia had 80% BTTS (10–6; averages 2.0 and 1.2), so the visitors’ form increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering the seasonal 85%/69% BTTS, goal averages 2.23 vs 1.92 and xG 1.80 vs 1.49, I recommend BTTS "Yes" with an estimated probability of 78% versus 22% for "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistics point to a goal-friendly match: hosts Lomza score an average of 2.23 goals per game, visitors Lechia T. Mazowiecki 1.92, with xG of 1.80 for the hosts and 1.49 for the visitors. The average of the hosts' xG (1.80) and the xG against the visitors (1.65) yields an expected 1.73 goals for Lomza, while the average of the visitors' xG (1.49) and the xG against the hosts (1.51) is 1.50 goals for Lechia, totaling 3.23. The hosts register on average 16.08 shots with 6.25 on target versus the visitors' 11.44 and 4.78 on target, which supports the attacking edge and higher xG for the hosts. Both teams frequently produce Both Teams To Score (BTTS: 85% for the hosts and 69% for the visitors) and the seasonal percentages of matches over 1.5 goals are 100% and 92%, strongly favoring Over 1.5. The seasonal share of matches over 2.5 is 69% for both teams, but the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last 5 matches the visitors were leading at the break in 60% of games (3 of 5), scoring a total of 10 goals by half-time (1.6 on average), while the hosts had only 4 half-time goals (0.2 average). Lomza comes out strongly after the break: in minutes 46–60 they scored 8 goals versus 3 for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 2.0 points in second halves with a positive second-half goal difference (+4 vs 0). Over the season the hosts led at half-time in 54% of matches, average 1.23 goals at half-time and concede 0.46, with xG of 1.80 versus the visitors’ 1.49 and 6.25 shots on target versus 4.78, demonstrating their chance-creation ability. Additionally, 85% of the hosts’ matches end with both teams scoring, so an early visitor lead does not preclude a turnaround after the break. For these reasons the strongest signal from the data is the HT/FT 2/1 scenario: visitors leading at half-time, and Lomza overturns the deficit to win after regular time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
12Shots12
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
4Shots on target3
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
1.29xG1.17
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
6Corners8
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
35Dangerous attacks28
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
-1Fouls-1
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
-1Cards-1
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
2.23Goals scored / match2.08
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
0.96Goals conceded / match1.58
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
42%Average possession42%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
4.42Shots on target / match4.35
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.35Shots per match11.19
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
4.42Shots on target4.35
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
21.6%Shot conversion18.6%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
42%Possession42%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
1.76xG for1.69
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
1.28xG against1.57
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

Shooting quality

Lomza: Counter-attackingLechia T. Mazowiecki: Counter-attacking
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
Accuracy (shots on target)43%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Lomza · 2 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Lomza
LLWWL
Season result split
62% W15% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-4-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Lechia T. Mazowiecki
DLWWW
Season result split
42% W19% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-10
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lomza is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

2.23 goals / match - Lomza · 2.08 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Lomza is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.96 goals / match - Lomza · 1.58 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Lomza scoring profile: very strong

Lomza scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Lechia T. Mazowiecki keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scoring profile: very strong

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Lomza keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).

58Goals scored (season)54
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
25Goals conceded (season)41
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
3.19Average goals in match3.65
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
7Goals scored (last 5)10
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal88%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
62%2 goals46%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
38%3 goals38%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
23%4 goals15%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal88%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
27%2 goals50%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
8%3 goals15%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
4%4 goals4%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

77%
Lechia T. Mazowiecki - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 26 matches
64%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time35%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
0%BTTS in both halves4%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
42%Scored in both halves31%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
20%BTTS - last 580%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time62%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.46 pts / match - Lomza · 1.77 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Lomza - half-time state
35% leading42% draw23% trailing
Lechia T. Mazowiecki - half-time state
46% leading38% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.46Points per match (1st half)1.77
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
0.81Goals scored (1st half)1.19
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
1.35Average goals (1st half)1.69
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
69%Clean sheet before half-time54%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
50%No goal before half-time31%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

After half-time (2nd half)

2.12Points per match (2nd half)1.08
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
1.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
1.85Average goals (2nd half)1.96
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
62%Clean sheet after half-time31%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki
23%No goal after half-time50%
LomzaLechia T. Mazowiecki

Lomza - second-half results

62% W27% D12% L
38
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+26
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki - second-half results

27% W27% D46% L
46
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 42%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lomza - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Lechia T. Mazowiecki - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+6-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lomza
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
4
16-30
11
6
31-45
10
4
46-60
11
5
61-75
16
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
8
6
16-30
13
4
31-45
11
13
46-60
3
11
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lomza

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.79
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

LomzaLigaLechia T. Mazowiecki
Average goals in match▼ 3.193.39▲ 3.65
Both teams scored▼ 46%64%▲ 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 58%68%• 69%
Clean sheets▲ 42%20%▼ 12%
Goal before half-time▼ 65%76%▲ 81%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%86%• 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.39
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.49
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Cezary Sauczek⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Mateusz Kempski⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lechia T. MazowieckiGoalMateusz Kempski
  2. LomzaGoalCezary Sauczek

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lomza 0 - 1 - 0 Lechia T. Mazowiecki. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki
1 : 1
Lomza

FAQ

What was the result of Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Lomza 1:1 Lechia T. Mazowiecki. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki?

Lomza score 2.23 goals per game on average and Lechia T. Mazowiecki 2.08. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Lomza's matches and 77% of Lechia T. Mazowiecki's.

What form are Lomza and Lechia T. Mazowiecki in?

Over the last 5 games Lomza have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Lechia T. Mazowiecki 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.