Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki: match statistics
Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lomza played Lechia T. Mazowiecki in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Lomza: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lomza scores 2.23 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores 2.08 and concedes 1.58. League average: 3.39 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lomza 46%, Lechia T. Mazowiecki 77%. Over 2.5: Lomza 58%, Lechia T. Mazowiecki 69%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Lomza has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.69. Lomza: 10.3 shots per match, Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 11.2.
Match halves
Lomza: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.42. Lechia T. Mazowiecki: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Lomza: 76-90+ (16 goals). Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.39 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lomza are the favorites: they sit 3rd with 16 wins, 4 draws and 6 losses this season, while Lechia have 11 wins, 5 draws and 10 losses. At home Lomza average 2.62 goals scored and have xG 1.83 with 1.00 goals conceded on average, whereas Lechia away score 1.92 (xG 1.49) and concede 1.77 per match. The hosts register more shots on target (6.67 vs 4.78), convert chances better (18% vs 15%), maintain higher possession (56% vs 51%) and have 46% clean sheets at home versus 15% for the visitors. However, Lechia show better form over the last five matches: 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss, 10 goals scored and 2.0 points per game compared to Lomza’s 7 goals and 1.2 points, which narrows the home advantage. Considering Lomza’s seasonal defensive superiority (25 goals conceded vs 41) and 69% home win rate versus the visitors’ 46% win rate, I forecast a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS (Both Teams To Score) scenario appears more likely: home side records BTTS 85% this season and visitors 69%, both above the league average of 63%. Lomża averages 2.23 goals scored and concedes 1.38 per match, while Lechia averages 1.92 scored and 1.77 conceded, indicating both teams regularly feature on the scoresheet. xG analysis shows the home team generates 1.80 xG while conceding 1.65 xG to Lechia, and Lechia posts 1.49 xG while conceding 1.51 xG to Lomża, supporting a goals exchange. Last 5 matches give mixed signals: Lomża had only 20% BTTS (7 scored and 5 conceded; averages 1.4 and 1.0), while Lechia had 80% BTTS (10–6; averages 2.0 and 1.2), so the visitors’ form increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering the seasonal 85%/69% BTTS, goal averages 2.23 vs 1.92 and xG 1.80 vs 1.49, I recommend BTTS "Yes" with an estimated probability of 78% versus 22% for "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics point to a goal-friendly match: hosts Lomza score an average of 2.23 goals per game, visitors Lechia T. Mazowiecki 1.92, with xG of 1.80 for the hosts and 1.49 for the visitors. The average of the hosts' xG (1.80) and the xG against the visitors (1.65) yields an expected 1.73 goals for Lomza, while the average of the visitors' xG (1.49) and the xG against the hosts (1.51) is 1.50 goals for Lechia, totaling 3.23. The hosts register on average 16.08 shots with 6.25 on target versus the visitors' 11.44 and 4.78 on target, which supports the attacking edge and higher xG for the hosts. Both teams frequently produce Both Teams To Score (BTTS: 85% for the hosts and 69% for the visitors) and the seasonal percentages of matches over 1.5 goals are 100% and 92%, strongly favoring Over 1.5. The seasonal share of matches over 2.5 is 69% for both teams, but the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches the visitors were leading at the break in 60% of games (3 of 5), scoring a total of 10 goals by half-time (1.6 on average), while the hosts had only 4 half-time goals (0.2 average). Lomza comes out strongly after the break: in minutes 46–60 they scored 8 goals versus 3 for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 2.0 points in second halves with a positive second-half goal difference (+4 vs 0). Over the season the hosts led at half-time in 54% of matches, average 1.23 goals at half-time and concede 0.46, with xG of 1.80 versus the visitors’ 1.49 and 6.25 shots on target versus 4.78, demonstrating their chance-creation ability. Additionally, 85% of the hosts’ matches end with both teams scoring, so an early visitor lead does not preclude a turnaround after the break. For these reasons the strongest signal from the data is the HT/FT 2/1 scenario: visitors leading at half-time, and Lomza overturns the deficit to win after regular time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lomza | Lechia T. Mazowiecki | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Lomza · 2 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lomza is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
2.23 goals / match - Lomza · 2.08 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki
Lomza is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.96 goals / match - Lomza · 1.58 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki
Lomza scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Lechia T. Mazowiecki keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).
Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Lomza keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lomza
Over / Under - Lechia T. Mazowiecki
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / match - Lomza · 1.77 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lomza - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Lechia T. Mazowiecki - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 42%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lomza
Lechia T. Mazowiecki
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Lomza | Liga | Lechia T. Mazowiecki | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.19 | 3.39 | ▲ 3.65 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 64% | ▲ 77% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 68% | • 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 20% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 86% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Lechia T. MazowieckiGoalMateusz Kempski
- LomzaGoalCezary Sauczek
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Lomza 0 - 1 - 0 Lechia T. Mazowiecki. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Lomza 1:1 Lechia T. Mazowiecki. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki?
Lomza score 2.23 goals per game on average and Lechia T. Mazowiecki 2.08. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Lomza's matches and 77% of Lechia T. Mazowiecki's.
What form are Lomza and Lechia T. Mazowiecki in?
Over the last 5 games Lomza have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Lechia T. Mazowiecki 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lomza vs Lechia T. Mazowiecki: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


