United States - MLSBMO StadiumData current as of 23 October 2026

Los Angeles FC vs New York RB: match statistics

Los Angeles FC crest
Los Angeles FC
2 : 0half-time 1:0
New York RB crest
New York RB

Los Angeles FC vs New York RB: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Los Angeles FC played New York RB in MLS (United States). The match was played on 10 September 2026. Venue: BMO Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Los Angeles FC: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. New York RB: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Los Angeles FC scores 1.58 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. New York RB scores 1.39 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Los Angeles FC 42%, New York RB 70%. Over 2.5: Los Angeles FC 50%, New York RB 61%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Los Angeles FC has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.57. Los Angeles FC: 14.4 shots per match, New York RB: 13.4.

Match halves

Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.79. New York RB: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Los Angeles FC: 31-45+ (9 goals). New York RB: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Los Angeles FC have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 58% of their matches, score an average of 1.92 goals and concede just 0.92, while New York RB lose 50% of their away games and allow opponents to score 2.30 goals per match. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 58% of their home fixtures, whereas the visitors have not managed to finish a single away match without conceding. The quality of chances created also slightly favors LAFC, whose average xG stands at 1.67 compared with 1.54 for New York RB, while their xG against is lower: 1.42 to 1.67. However, both teams are currently in poor form, with LAFC scoring 2 goals in their last 5 matches and failing to win any of them, while New York RB have recorded 1 win during this period and a 6:9 goal difference. Home advantage and the visitors’ defensive vulnerability should nevertheless give LAFC the best chance of ending their winless run.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is particularly strong on the New York RB side, with both teams scoring in 90% of their matches this season and in 80% of their last five games. The visitors have failed to keep a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.30 goals per match, while LAFC generate an average of 1.62 xG and register 4.58 shots on target per game. LAFC should also allow the opposition chances, as they concede an average of 1.92 goals, while New York RB produce 1.54 xG and 5.20 shots on target per match. The risk to the pick is the hosts’ poor recent finishing, having scored just 2 goals in their last five appearances and recorded BTTS in 40% of matches, although their xG during this period stands at a high 1.94. Given the visitors’ very weak defense and the league-average BTTS rate of 62%, the more likely scenario is for both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as at least 2 goals were scored in 83% of Los Angeles FC matches and in every New York RB game. New York RB have kept no clean sheets, concede an average of 2.30 goals per match, and have an average xG conceded of 1.67, which supports the case for a home goal despite their average of just 0.4 goals scored in their last five appearances. Los Angeles FC also rarely keep a clean sheet, doing so in only 8% of matches, while the visitors have scored at least once in 90% of their games. Both sides retain clear offensive potential: average xG stands at 1.62 for the hosts and 1.54 for the visitors, while both teams register more than 13 shots per match. The 2.5 line also has merit, especially as 80% of New York RB matches ended Over 2.5, but LAFC’s weaker recent finishing reduces its confidence compared with Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

New York RB has the clearer signal for the opening phase of the match: in their last five games, they led at the break 40% of the time, while Los Angeles FC failed to take the lead on any occasion and were behind at half-time in 60% of their matches. The home side have not scored a single goal before the interval in this run, and their total average is just 0.4 goals per game, which limits their chances of a quick turnaround. The visitors produce more shots on target per match, 5.2 compared with 4.58, while their xG stands at 1.54 against LAFC’s 1.62. Therefore, despite the hosts’ slight edge in this metric, RB’s attack remains a genuine threat. New York RB have not kept a clean sheet this season and concede an average of 2.3 goals, so draw or turnaround scenarios after half-time remain relevant. However, LAFC’s poor current finishing record most strongly supports the scenario of the visitors leading at the break and securing the final victory, i.e. the HT/FT pick X/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
15Shots8
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
8Shots on target1
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
1.88xG1.04
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
9Corners3
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
53Dangerous attacks62
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
11Fouls13
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
2Cards2
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Los Angeles FCNew York RB
1.58Goals scored / match1.39
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
1Goals conceded / match2
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
47%Average possession53%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
4.5Shots on target / match4.83
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.42Shots per match13.39
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
4.5Shots on target4.83
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
11%Shot conversion10.4%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
47%Possession53%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
1.58xG for1.57
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
1.46xG against1.56
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: AttackingNew York RB: Balanced
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
Accuracy (shots on target)31%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Los Angeles FC is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 0.4 pts / match - New York RB

Los Angeles FC
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-7
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
New York RB
LLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W26% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-10
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Los Angeles FC is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.58 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.39 goals / match - New York RB

Los Angeles FC is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 2 goals / match - New York RB

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while New York RB keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).

New York RB scoring profile: mixed

New York RB scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).

38Goals scored (season)32
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
24Goals conceded (season)46
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
2.58Average goals in match3.39
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal74%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
42%2 goals35%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
21%3 goals22%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
8%4 goals9%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal91%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
29%2 goals61%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
13%3 goals26%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
8%4 goals13%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time22%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
4%BTTS in both halves17%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
25%Scored in both halves26%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
40%BTTS - last 560%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing
New York RB - half-time state
35% leading30% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.35
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.7
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.43
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
67%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
58%No goal before half-time52%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)0.87
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)1.26
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.96
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
58%Clean sheet after half-time26%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB
38%No goal after half-time48%
Los Angeles FCNew York RB

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

42% W38% D21% L
33
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

New York RB - second-half results

22% W22% D57% L
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
New York RB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
5
4
16-30
9
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

New York RB
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
2
3
16-30
7
8
31-45
6
11
46-60
3
9
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

New York RB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaNew York RB
Average goals in match▼ 2.583.21▲ 3.39
Both teams scored▼ 42%64%▲ 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%62%• 61%
Clean sheets▲ 50%21%▼ 9%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%77%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▼ 79%81%▲ 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. New York RBYellow cardDylan Nealis
  2. Los Angeles FCGoalJude Terry
  3. Los Angeles FCYellow cardKenny Nielsen
  4. New York RBYellow cardJulián Andrés Bazán Medina
  5. New York RBSubstitutionOn: Jahkeele Marshall-RuttyOff: Devin Padelford
  6. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Ryan RaposoOff: Kenny Nielsen
  7. Los Angeles FCYellow cardRyan Raposo
  8. Los Angeles FCGoalArmindo SiebAssist: Ryan Hollingshead

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs New York RB?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 2:0 New York RB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs New York RB?

Los Angeles FC score 1.58 goals per game on average and New York RB 1.39. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 70% of New York RB's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and New York RB in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and New York RB 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs New York RB?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.