United States - MLSData current as of 13 September 2026

Los Angeles FC vs Orlando City: match statistics

Los Angeles FC crest
Los Angeles FC
6 : 0half-time 5:0
Orlando City crest
Orlando City

Los Angeles FC vs Orlando City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Los Angeles FC played Orlando City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 5 April 2026. Final score: 6:0.

Current form

Los Angeles FC: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Orlando City: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Los Angeles FC scores 1.60 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. Orlando City scores 1.00 and concedes 3.40. League average: 3.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Los Angeles FC 0%, Orlando City 60%. Over 2.5: Los Angeles FC 20%, Orlando City 100%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Los Angeles FC has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.12. Los Angeles FC: 13.8 shots per match, Orlando City: 11.0.

Match halves

Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.40. Orlando City: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Los Angeles FC: 76-90+ (3 goals). Orlando City: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Los Angeles FC have a home record of 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, scoring 8 goals and conceding none (2.0 goals per game and 100% clean sheets). Orlando City away record is 1 win and 4 losses, with 5 goals scored and 17 conceded (on average 0.0 scored and 5.0 conceded per game), and 100% of away matches without scoring. In terms of chance quality, LA generates on average 1.48 xG at home, averages 13 shots (5.33 on target) and posts a conversion rate of around 15%, while Orlando only produces 0.63 xG away, 6.5 shots (1 on target) and 0% conversion. Additionally, LAFC averages 2.2 points over the last 5 matches versus Orlando’s 0.6, with possession 46% vs 36% and a home goal difference of 8-0 compared to the visitors’ 5-17, all confirming a clear home advantage. Based on this, I predict a Los Angeles FC victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend a 'No' (BTTS - No) scenario because Orlando shows very poor offensive efficiency: only 1.0 goals on average in the last 5 matches and merely 1.0 shots on target per game with a conversion rate of 0.0%. Los Angeles, on the other hand, averages 5.67 shots on target and has conceded only 0.4 goals in the last 5 matches, indicating home defensive control. xG analysis confirms LA’s advantage: hosts have xG_for 1.45 versus Orlando’s average xG_against 1.76, while Orlando xG_for is only 0.63 against the hosts’ xG_against 2.08, meaning the visitors rarely create high-quality chances. Despite conflicting seasonal indicators (seasonal BTTS rate at home 100% vs 0% for the visitors), the more recent numbers are convincing: Orlando conceded 17 goals in the last 5 matches (3.4 average) and scored only 5, so I assign a higher probability to the guests not scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on the last 5 matches and xG I estimate 1.85 goals for Los Angeles FC and 1.17 for Orlando City (calculated as the average: (last5_xG_for_home 1.73 + last5_xG_against_away 1.96)/2 = 1.85 and (last5_xG_for_away 1.12 + last5_xG_against_home 1.23)/2 = 1.17), yielding an expected 3.02 goals in the match. Additionally, LAFC averages 14 shots and 5.67 on target per game with xG 1.45 and an actual goals average of 1.67, while Orlando records only 6.5 shots and 1.0 on target and have conceded 17 goals in their last 5 matches, which supports a higher-scoring scenario. Season metrics show both teams have 100% of sampled matches over 1.5 and over 2.5, which together with the above figures increases the probability of Over 1.5 to ~94% and Over 2.5 to ~72%, despite LAFC having only 20% of matches over 2.5 in their last 5. The 3.5 line is more ambiguous: season Over 3.5 is 33% for the home side and 100% for Orlando, and the expected total of 3.02 goals implies a moderate probability of Over 3.5 at ~46%. The strongest signal and the best market to play is Over 2.5, because the expected 3.02 goals, LAFC’s shot advantage (14 vs 6.5) and Orlando’s 17 goals conceded in the last 5 matches provide a coherent, statistical argument in favor of the over.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Los Angeles FC led at the break in 67% of their home matches (2 of 3) and averaged 1.33 goals by half-time, whereas Orlando City averages 0.0 goals at half-time and has not led at the break in any match (0%). Offensively LAFC generates 1.45 xG and averages 5.67 shots on target from 14.0 shots overall, while Orlando records only 0.63 xG and 1.0 shot on target per match, with a conversion rate of 0.0% for the visitors. As an away side Orlando concedes an average of 5.0 goals per match and has a 100% loss rate this season, which, combined with LAFC having collected 6 points at half-time and averaging 2.0 half-time points per match, increases the likelihood of the hosts maintaining a lead. Despite some fluctuations in the last five matches (LAFC form: W D W W D, 60% wins in the last five; Orlando 20%), xG metrics, shots on target and half-time goals clearly favor LAFC after 45 minutes. Therefore the most likely scenario is LAFC leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1) — I assess this at about 45%, with roughly a 12% chance of a half-time draw and a home win (1/X), and much lower chances of a turnaround by Orlando (1/2 ≈ 3%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

5 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
17Shots12
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
8Shots on target6
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
1.92xG1.53
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
8Corners7
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
41Dangerous attacks48
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
12Fouls14
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
2Cards3
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Los Angeles FCOrlando City
1.6Goals scored / match1
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0Goals conceded / match3.4
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
49%Average possession39%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
4.6Shots on target / match3.8
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.8Shots per match11
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
4.6Shots on target3.8
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
11.6%Shot conversion9.1%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
49%Possession39%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
1.53xG for1.12
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
1.47xG against1.95
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: BalancedOrlando City: Balanced
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Los Angeles FC is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 0.6 pts / match - Orlando City

Los Angeles FC
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
80% W20% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Orlando City
LLLWL
Season result split
20% W0% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Los Angeles FC is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1 goals / match - Orlando City

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Orlando City scoring profile: more difficult

Orlando City scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 100% (5 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)5
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0Goals conceded (season)17
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
1.6Average goals in match4.4
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0Goals conceded (last 5)17
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
60%2 goals40%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
20%3 goals0%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%4 goals0%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal100%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%2 goals80%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%3 goals60%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%4 goals60%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
20%Scored in both halves0%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS40%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%BTTS - last 560%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

20%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Los Angeles FC is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.2 pts / match - Orlando City

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Orlando City - half-time state
40% leading0% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.2
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0Goals conceded (1st half)1.6
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0.2Average goals (1st half)2.4
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
100%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
80%No goal before half-time60%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

After half-time (2nd half)

2.6Points per match (2nd half)0.8
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1.8
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
1.4Average goals (2nd half)2
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
100%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City
20%No goal after half-time80%
Los Angeles FCOrlando City

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

80% W20% D0% L
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Orlando City - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Orlando City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.61.8
Average goals in match2.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-8
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
5
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.5 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.2
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaOrlando City
Average goals in match 1.603.07 4.40
Both teams scored 0%53% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%61% 100%
Clean sheets 100%27% 0%
Goal before half-time 20%72% 100%
Goal after half-time 80%82% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+67%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Orlando CityGoalDavid Brekalo
  2. Los Angeles FCGoalDenis BouangaAssist: Heung-Min Son
  3. Orlando CityYellow cardEduard Andrés Atuesta Velasco
  4. Los Angeles FCGoalDenis BouangaAssist: Heung-Min Son
  5. Los Angeles FCYellow cardDenis Bouanga
  6. Los Angeles FCGoalDenis BouangaAssist: Heung-Min Son
  7. Los Angeles FCGoalSergi Palencia HurtadoAssist: Heung-Min Son
  8. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Mathieu ChoiniereOff: Timothy Tillmann
  9. Orlando CityYellow cardDuncan McGuire
  10. Los Angeles FCGoalTyler Dominic BoydAssist: Jacob Shaffelburg
  11. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Ryan RaposoOff: Sergi Palencia Hurtado
  12. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Jeremy EbobisseOff: Tyler Dominic Boyd
  13. Los Angeles FCYellow cardDavid Enmanuel Martínez Morales
  14. Orlando CityYellow cardIván Darío Angulo Cortés
  15. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Yutaro TsukadaOff: Iván Darío Angulo Cortés

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs Orlando City?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 6:0 Orlando City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs Orlando City?

Los Angeles FC score 1.60 goals per game on average and Orlando City 1.00. The MLS average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 60% of Orlando City's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and Orlando City in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Orlando City 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs Orlando City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.