United States - MLSBMO StadiumData current as of 30 August 2026

Los Angeles FC vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

Los Angeles FC vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Los Angeles FC played Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: BMO Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Los Angeles FC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Portland Timbers: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Los Angeles FC scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.85 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Los Angeles FC 38%, Portland Timbers 75%. Over 2.5: Los Angeles FC 52%, Portland Timbers 75%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.47. Los Angeles FC: 13.2 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 13.2.

Match halves

Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.86. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Los Angeles FC: 31-45+ (8 goals). Portland Timbers: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Los Angeles FC have a clear home advantage: they win 64% of their home matches, averaging 2.00 goals scored and just 0.91 conceded. Portland lose 70% of their away games, have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.00 goals to their opponents. The hosts are also more clinical, converting 15% of their shots compared with Portland’s 11%, while the visitors have failed to score in 40% of their away fixtures. Recent form is more favorable for the Timbers, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 12 goals in that span, but their defense has conceded 9. With Portland’s average away xG against standing at 2.07, compared with the 1.49 xG created by LAFC at home, the hosts should generate enough chances to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Los Angeles FC have landed BTTS - Yes in 89% of their matches, well above the league average of 62%, while Portland have recorded this outcome in 60% of games. The hosts score an average of 2.22 goals, whereas Portland concede 2.00 goals away from home and have a high xG against of 2.07, strongly supporting a LAFC goal. Portland, meanwhile, are in excellent attacking form over their last five matches, averaging 2.4 goals scored, with BTTS - Yes landing in 100% of those games. Although LAFC have conceded just 0.8 goals per match across their last five outings, their average xG conceded stands at 1.67, while Portland average 4.3 shots on target, meaning an away goal remains likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal threshold in 100% of their league matches so far, which is a very strong signal in favour of the over. Los Angeles FC average 2.22 goals per game, while Portland concede as many as 2.00, with the hosts creating chances worth an average of 1.63 xG and the visitors’ defence allowing opponents 2.07 xG. Portland have scored 12 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 per game, while LAFC have kept a clean sheet in only 11% of their matches this season. Although the hosts have scored just 0.8 goals per game across their last five outings, the opponent’s attacking profile and a projected total of 3.10 goals clearly support Over 1.5 goals. The Over 1.5 line offers an advantage over higher thresholds because it requires only two goals, whereas Over 2.5 is more vulnerable to LAFC’s recent decline in finishing efficiency.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Portland win, as both teams were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches. In this period, Portland averaged 1.4 goals before half-time, while Los Angeles FC scored only 0.4, and the hosts managed just 0.8 goals per game across their last five matches. The visitors are in clearly better form: they won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 2.4 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, whereas LAFC recorded just one win and 3 draws. Season-long figures still give the hosts a home advantage, but Portland currently possess the more effective attack, while the visitors’ weak defence, conceding an average of 2.0 goals per game this season, increases the likelihood of a closely contested start rather than them taking the lead at the break. After half-time, Portland averaged 1.0 goals in their last five outings, which, combined with LAFC’s weaker current form, supports a turnaround in the second half and a Portland win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
33Shots8
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
12Shots on target2
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
3.62xG0.78
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
12Corners0
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
100Dangerous attacks17
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
10Fouls15
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
2Cards3
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
1.67Goals scored / match1.85
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
1Goals conceded / match1.8
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
46%Average possession51%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
4.29Shots on target / match4.7
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.19Shots per match13.2
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
4.29Shots on target4.7
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
12.6%Shot conversion14%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
46%Possession51%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
1.47xG for1.53
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
1.45xG against1.86
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: Counter-attackingPortland Timbers: Efficient finishing
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 2 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Los Angeles FC
WWDLL
Season result split
48% W19% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-7
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Portland Timbers
DWWLW
Season result split
40% W15% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-9
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.85 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Los Angeles FC is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.8 goals / match - Portland Timbers

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: strong

Portland Timbers scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 52% (11 of 21 matches).

35Goals scored (season)37
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
21Goals conceded (season)36
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
2.67Average goals in match3.65
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
8Goals scored (last 5)10
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal80%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
43%2 goals60%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
24%3 goals20%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
10%4 goals10%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal95%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
29%2 goals60%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
14%3 goals20%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
10%4 goals5%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

75%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 20 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time40%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
29%Scored in both halves45%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS70%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Los Angeles FC is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 1 pts / match - Portland Timbers

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.85
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)1.15
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
1.19Average goals (1st half)2
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
71%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
57%No goal before half-time40%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
57%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers
33%No goal after half-time35%
Los Angeles FCPortland Timbers

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

43% W38% R19% P
29
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
20
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.403.00
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-4+7
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
8
7
16-30
5
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
7
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals in match 2.673.19 3.65
Both teams scored 38%63% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%61% 75%
Clean sheets 52%21% 5%
Goal before half-time 62%76% 100%
Goal after half-time 81%81% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland TimbersGoalDavid Pereira da CostaAssist: Kristoffer Velde
  2. Los Angeles FCYellow cardMathieu Choiniere
  3. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Jacob ShaffelburgOff: Timothy Tillmann
  4. Portland TimbersYellow cardKevin Jesús Kelsy Genez
  5. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Ian SmithOff: Jimer Fory
  6. Los Angeles FCGoalDenis BouangaAssist: Jude Terry
  7. Los Angeles FCYellow cardDenis Bouanga
  8. Portland TimbersYellow cardVincent Janssen
  9. Portland TimbersYellow cardVincent Janssen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Los Angeles FC 0 - 0 - 1 Portland Timbers. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 1:1 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs Portland Timbers?

Los Angeles FC score 1.67 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.85. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 75% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Portland Timbers 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs Portland Timbers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.