United States - MLSBMO StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake: match statistics

Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Los Angeles FC played Real Salt Lake in MLS (United States). The match was played on 23 July 2026. Venue: BMO Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Los Angeles FC: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Real Salt Lake: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Los Angeles FC scores 1.69 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Real Salt Lake scores 1.86 and concedes 1.36. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Los Angeles FC 38%, Real Salt Lake 71%. Over 2.5: Los Angeles FC 56%, Real Salt Lake 71%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Real Salt Lake has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.60. Los Angeles FC: 14.2 shots per match, Real Salt Lake: 15.1.

Match halves

Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00. Real Salt Lake: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Los Angeles FC: 61-75 (6 goals). Real Salt Lake: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Los Angeles FC wins 63% of matches at home, scores 1.88 goals and concedes 1.00 goal per game on average, giving them a home goal difference of +7 and 75% clean sheets. The hosts average 14.13 shots per game, including 4.5 on target, with a conversion rate of around 13%, confirming offensive efficiency at home. Real Salt Lake have only a 17% win rate on the road, score 1.33 goals and concede 1.83 goals per away match, with a 0% clean sheet rate and a conversion of about 11% from 12.33 shots per game. Although the visitors have better short-term form (2.0 points per game and 3 wins in the last 5 versus LAFC’s 1.2 points and 2 wins), xG metrics favor the hosts: xG for LAFC is 1.59 versus 1.33 for RSL, and xG against is 1.42 versus 1.49. Based on this, I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a high BTTS rate: Los Angeles FC has 63% of matches with both teams scoring, and Real Salt Lake 83%, while the league average is 61% — a strong signal for BTTS - Yes. In the last 5 matches BTTS rates are 60% for LA and 80% for RSL, and Real Salt Lake has 0% clean sheets this season versus 25% for LA, which increases the likelihood that both teams will find the net. Looking at chance creation, LA scores 2.25 goals on average (xG 1.93) and records 7.25 shots on target and 17.25 shots per game, while RSL has 1.33 goals (xG 1.33) with 4.17 shots on target and 12.33 shots; this means both sides have realistic scoring opportunities. Defensively LA concedes 1.0 goal on average (xG against 1.29), while RSL concedes 1.83 goals (xG against 1.49), so the visitors statistically allow more goal-scoring situations. Based on this I assign a 78% probability to BTTS 'yes' and 22% to 'no', because the combination of 63% vs 83% season BTTS, 60% vs 80% in the last 5 matches, RSL's lack of clean sheets and solid xG figures (1.93 vs 1.33) creates the strongest signal for Both Teams To Score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistical analysis indicates high goal potential: Los Angeles FC averages 2.25 goals at home (xG 1.93), while Real Salt Lake concedes 1.83 goals away (xG against 1.49); based on this I estimate 1.72 goals for LAFC and 1.30 for RSL, totaling 3.02. Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals — LAFC 100% and RSL 83% — and solid over 2.5 rates: LAFC 75% and RSL 67%, with both sides registering over 2.5 in 80% of their last 5 matches. Additionally, the league average is 3.3 goals per game, LAFC averages 17.25 shots (7.25 on target) and RSL 12.33 (4.17 on target), which supports a projection of at least three goals. Combined xG for both teams is 1.93+1.33=3.26, and the fact that both teams have scored in 63% and 83% of matches respectively confirms a tendency for goal exchange. For these reasons the best line to play is Over 2.5 (estimated 75%), while Over 1.5 is nearly certain (~92%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Los Angeles FC led at half-time in 4 matches (50%) and were level at half-time in 4 (50%), never trailing at half-time (0%), which strongly indicates a home advantage in the first half. Over full matches LAFC win at home in 88% of games, score on average 2.25 goals and concede 1.00, while Real Salt Lake have only a 17% win rate, 1.33 goals scored and 1.83 conceded per match. The xG rate is 1.93 for LAFC versus 1.33 for RSL, and the home side records more shots on target (7.25 vs 4.17); at half-time LAFC average 1.25 goals and concede 0.38, which favors maintaining a lead. Although the season BTTS rates are 63% for the hosts and 83% for the visitors, the home team’s low average goals conceded by half-time (0.38) and high home efficiency (88% wins) make the most likely scenario a lead at 45' and a full-time victory for LAFC (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

29Possession (%)71
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
12Shots28
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
3Shots on target6
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.24xG2.72
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
7Corners12
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
39Dangerous attacks77
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
5Fouls7
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0Cards0
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.69Goals scored / match1.86
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.06Goals conceded / match1.36
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
48%Average possession50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
4.75Shots on target / match5.93
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.19Shots per match15.14
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
4.75Shots on target5.93
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
11.9%Shot conversion12.3%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
48%Possession50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.6xG for1.68
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.36xG against1.37
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: AttackingReal Salt Lake: Attacking
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Real Salt Lake is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 2 pts / match - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC
LLLWW
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Real Salt Lake
WLWWD
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Real Salt Lake is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.69 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.86 goals / match - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.36 goals / match - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Real Salt Lake keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

Real Salt Lake scoring profile: mixed

Real Salt Lake scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 63% (10 of 16 matches).

27Goals scored (season)26
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
17Goals conceded (season)19
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
2.75Average goals in match3.21
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
8Goals scored (last 5)9
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal86%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
44%2 goals64%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%3 goals29%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
6%4 goals7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

How often they concede at least...

38%1 goal86%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
38%2 goals43%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%3 goals7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
13%4 goals0%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time43%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
6%BTTS in both halves7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
25%Scored in both halves36%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
60%BTTS - last 560%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Real Salt Lake is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.79 pts / match - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
25% leading44% draw31% trailing
Real Salt Lake - half-time state
43% leading50% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.79
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0.69Goals scored (1st half)1.14
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.71
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
69%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
63%No goal before half-time29%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

After half-time (2nd half)

1.88Points per match (2nd half)1.14
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
63%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
25%No goal after half-time50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

50% W38% R13% P
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Real Salt Lake - second-half results

29% W29% R43% P
25
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Real Salt Lake - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
6
2
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Real Salt Lake
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
7
4
16-30
5
1
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Real Salt Lake

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaReal Salt Lake
Average goals in match 2.753.29 3.21
Both teams scored 38%62% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%62% 71%
Clean sheets 63%22% 14%
Goal before half-time 56%77% 79%
Goal after half-time 81%80% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Los Angeles FCGoalHeung-Min SonAssist: Jacob Shaffelburg
  2. Los Angeles FCGoalDenis BouangaAssist: Mathieu Choiniere
  3. Real Salt LakeSubstitutionOn: Victor OlatunjiOff: Stijn Spierings
  4. Real Salt LakeGoalDeAndre Roselle Yedlin
  5. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Jeremy EbobisseOff: Heung-Min Son
  6. Real Salt LakeSubstitutionOn: Saba LobzhanidzeOff: Diego Luna
  7. Real Salt LakeSubstitutionOn: Alexandros KatranisOff: Juan Manuel Sanabria Magole
  8. Real Salt LakeGoalLukas Ahlefeld EngelAssist: Saba Lobzhanidze

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 3:1 Real Salt Lake. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake?

Los Angeles FC score 1.69 goals per game on average and Real Salt Lake 1.86. The MLS average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 71% of Real Salt Lake's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and Real Salt Lake in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Real Salt Lake 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.