United States - MLSData current as of 13 September 2026

Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics

Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Los Angeles FC played SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Los Angeles FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. SJ Earthquakes: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Los Angeles FC scores 2.14 and concedes 0.29 goals per match. SJ Earthquakes scores 1.86 and concedes 0.29. League average: 3.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Los Angeles FC 14%, SJ Earthquakes 14%. Over 2.5: Los Angeles FC 43%, SJ Earthquakes 43%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Los Angeles FC has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.57. Los Angeles FC: 14.9 shots per match, SJ Earthquakes: 14.4.

Match halves

Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.29. SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Los Angeles FC: 16-30 (3 goals). SJ Earthquakes: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Los Angeles FC have very strong home metrics: 4 wins in their last 4 home matches, averaging 3.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded per home game, translating to 100% wins and 100% clean sheets at home. San Jose Earthquakes arrive in good form — 3 wins in their last 3 away trips, averaging 1.67 goals scored and only 0.33 conceded on the road; across their last 5 matches they average 2.4 points per game (4 wins, 1 loss). In chance creation the hosts are clearly superior: LAFC average 14.0 shots and 6.0 on target per home match versus SJ’s 8.0 shots and 3.0 on target away, and the hosts’ xG at home is 1.59 against the visitors’ 0.98 xG on the road. The defensive differential also favors LA — although xG against them at home is 1.61, they actually concede 0.0 goals, while SJ has xG against 1.42 and actually concedes 0.33 goals away, so the hosts hold an advantage both in chance volume and effective defense. Given these figures I predict a home win (1); suggested probabilities: home 55%, draw 20%, away 25%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators point to a low likelihood of both teams scoring — Los Angeles FC has 0% BTTS at home, SJ Earthquakes 33%, versus a league average of 56%. Both sides record many clean sheets: LAFC 75% and SJ 67%, with average goals conceded of 0.25 and 0.33 per match (2 conceded each this season), which reduces the probability of Goal/Goal. LAFC’s attack is potent (2.0 goals and xG 2.01, 7 shots on target and 19.25 shots per match), whereas SJ posts 1.67 goals, xG 0.98, 3 shots on target and 8 shots, so the hosts will be the main source of threat while SJ has limited chance creation. In the last 5 matches LAFC averaged 2.2 scored and 0.6 conceded, SJ 1.8 scored and 0.4 conceded — the low conceded averages (0.6 and 0.4) and high clean sheet rates support a No Goal (clean sheet expected) outcome, therefore I propose a 75% vs 25% split.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on average xG and opponent defenses yields expected goals: home 1.72, away 0.85, total 2.57. Los Angeles FC records xG 2.01 and averages 19.25 shots (7.0 on target) per match with 2.0 goals scored on average, while San Jose has xG 0.98, 8.0 shots (3.0 on target) and 1.67 goals on average — indicating a clear home advantage in chance creation. Despite this, both teams display strong defensive numbers: LAFC concedes only 0.25 goals per match and has 75% clean sheets, and San Jose concedes 0.33 goals, which limits the likelihood of very high-scoring outcomes. Translating the expected 2.57 goals into a Poisson distribution gives roughly a 73% probability of at least 2 goals, about 48% for 3 or more, and around 26% for 4 or more, making over 1.5 the strongest market. Therefore I recommend over 1.5 as the best line to play, while over 2.5 and 3.5 carry higher risk given both teams’ defensive effectiveness.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Los Angeles FC has a seasonal goals average of 2.0 with an average conceded of 0.25, while San Jose scores 1.67 and concedes 0.33, giving the hosts the advantage in goal balance. LAFC also has a higher xG of 2.01 versus 0.98 and averages 19.25 shots (7 on target) compared to the visitors’ 8 shots (3 on target), so they create more and better scoring chances. At Half-Time the hosts led in 3 of 4 matches (75%) and score an average of 1.5 goals by the break versus the visitors’ 0.67, while the hosts’ seasonal clean sheet rate is 75% (visitors 67%), which suggests maintenance of the lead. Although San Jose are in good form (4 wins in 5, 80% over the last 5), their lower xG and fewer shots limit the likelihood of a turnaround, therefore the most probable scenario from the data is 1/1 (HT/FT).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 4
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
16Shots12
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
3Shots on target5
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.55xG1.37
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
5Corners3
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
45Dangerous attacks36
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
13Fouls10
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
3Cards3
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
2.14Goals scored / match1.86
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.29Goals conceded / match0.29
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
48%Average possession48%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
5Shots on target / match5.29
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.86Shots per match14.43
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
5Shots on target5.29
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
14.4%Shot conversion12.9%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
48%Possession48%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.62xG for1.57
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.5xG against1.02
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: AttackingSJ Earthquakes: Attacking
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJ Earthquakes is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 2.4 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC
WWDWL
Season result split
71% W14% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-1
2.29 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-0
Last 5 at home
4-0-0
WWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
SJ Earthquakes
WLWWW
Season result split
86% W0% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-0-1
2.57 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 away
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Los Angeles FC is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

2.14 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.86 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: mixed

Los Angeles FC scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 matches).

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: mixed

SJ Earthquakes scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 86% (6 of 7 matches).

15Goals scored (season)13
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
2Goals conceded (season)2
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
2.43Average goals in match2.14
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal86%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
57%2 goals57%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
29%3 goals43%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
14%4 goals0%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

How often they concede at least...

14%1 goal29%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
14%2 goals0%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0%3 goals0%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0%4 goals0%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time14%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
29%Scored in both halves43%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
20%BTTS - last 520%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time14%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 2 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing
SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
57% leading29% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)2
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.86Goals scored (1st half)1.14
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1Average goals (1st half)1.43
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
86%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
71%No goal before half-time29%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

After half-time (2nd half)

2.43Points per match (2nd half)2.14
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.43Average goals (2nd half)0.71
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
86%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
14%No goal after half-time43%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

71% W29% D0% L
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding245%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

57% W43% D0% L
14
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 86%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
3
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
72%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
14%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
24%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
154%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
15%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaSJ Earthquakes
Average goals in match 2.433.16 2.14
Both teams scored 14%57% 14%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%63% 43%
Clean sheets 86%24% 71%
Goal before half-time 43%74% 86%
Goal after half-time 86%81% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.95
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+61%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Los Angeles FCYellow cardTimothy Tillmann
  2. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardBeau Leroux
  3. SJ EarthquakesGoalOusseni BoudaAssist: Timo Werner
  4. SJ EarthquakesGoalTimo WernerAssist: Beau Leroux
  5. Los Angeles FCYellow cardRyan Porteous
  6. Los Angeles FCGoalRyan Porteous
  7. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardReid Roberts
  8. Los Angeles FCYellow cardDenis Bouanga
  9. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: David RomneyOff: Jamar Ricketts
  10. SJ EarthquakesGoalReid Roberts
  11. SJ EarthquakesGoalOusseni BoudaAssist: Niko Tsakiris
  12. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Ryan RaposoOff: Sergi Palencia Hurtado
  13. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardIan Harkes

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 1:4 SJ Earthquakes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

Los Angeles FC score 2.14 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 1.86. The MLS average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 14% of SJ Earthquakes's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and SJ Earthquakes in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.