United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics

Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Los Angeles FC play SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The match date is 20 April 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Los Angeles FC: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. SJ Earthquakes: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Los Angeles FC scores 1.76 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. SJ Earthquakes scores 2.13 and concedes 1.19. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Los Angeles FC 41%, SJ Earthquakes 56%. Over 2.5: Los Angeles FC 59%, SJ Earthquakes 63%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Los Angeles FC: 14.1 shots per match, SJ Earthquakes: 13.8.

Match halves

Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00. SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

Los Angeles FC: 61-75 (7 goals). SJ Earthquakes: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Los Angeles FC have very strong home metrics: 4 wins in their last 4 home matches, averaging 3.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded per home game, translating to 100% wins and 100% clean sheets at home. San Jose Earthquakes arrive in good form — 3 wins in their last 3 away trips, averaging 1.67 goals scored and only 0.33 conceded on the road; across their last 5 matches they average 2.4 points per game (4 wins, 1 loss). In chance creation the hosts are clearly superior: LAFC average 14.0 shots and 6.0 on target per home match versus SJ’s 8.0 shots and 3.0 on target away, and the hosts’ xG at home is 1.59 against the visitors’ 0.98 xG on the road. The defensive differential also favors LA — although xG against them at home is 1.61, they actually concede 0.0 goals, while SJ has xG against 1.42 and actually concedes 0.33 goals away, so the hosts hold an advantage both in chance volume and effective defense. Given these figures I predict a home win (1); suggested probabilities: home 55%, draw 20%, away 25%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 4
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
16Shots12
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
3Shots on target5
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.55xG1.37
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
5Corners3
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
45Dangerous attacks36
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
13Fouls10
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
3Cards3
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.76Goals scored / match2.13
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.06Goals conceded / match1.19
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
46%Average possession47%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
4.65Shots on target / match5.69
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.06Shots per match13.81
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
4.65Shots on target5.69
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
12.6%Shot conversion15.4%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
46%Possession47%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.58xG for1.58
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.44xG against1.42
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: Counter-attackingSJ Earthquakes: Counter-attacking
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
Accuracy (shots on target)33%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Los Angeles FC is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 0.8 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC
LLWWW
Season result split
53% W18% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-5
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
SJ Earthquakes
DLLWL
Season result split
63% W13% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.76 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 2.13 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.19 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 59% (10 of 17 matches).

30Goals scored (season)34
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
18Goals conceded (season)19
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
2.82Average goals in match3.31
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
6Goals conceded (last 5)12
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal88%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
47%2 goals63%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
24%3 goals44%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
6%4 goals13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

How often they concede at least...

41%1 goal69%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
35%2 goals25%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
18%3 goals19%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
12%4 goals6%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time31%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
6%BTTS in both halves13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
29%Scored in both halves38%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
60%BTTS - last 580%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Los Angeles FC · 1.69 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing
SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.69
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.76Goals scored (1st half)1
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.56
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
71%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
59%No goal before half-time31%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.82Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
59%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes
24%No goal after half-time44%
Los Angeles FCSJ Earthquakes

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

47% W41% R12% P
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding183%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
27
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.20
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
2
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaSJ Earthquakes
Average goals in match 2.823.30 3.31
Both teams scored 41%62% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%63% 63%
Clean sheets 59%21% 31%
Goal before half-time 59%77% 88%
Goal after half-time 82%81% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 1:4 SJ Earthquakes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

Los Angeles FC score 1.76 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 2.13. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 56% of SJ Earthquakes's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and SJ Earthquakes in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs SJ Earthquakes?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.