Loudoun United vs New Mexico United: match statistics
Loudoun United vs New Mexico United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Loudoun United played New Mexico United in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Loudoun United: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. New Mexico United: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Loudoun United scores 1.20 and concedes 1.93 goals per match. New Mexico United scores 1.36 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Loudoun United 73%, New Mexico United 50%. Over 2.5: Loudoun United 60%, New Mexico United 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Loudoun United has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.33. Loudoun United: 11.3 shots per match, New Mexico United: 11.9.
Match halves
Loudoun United: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.80. New Mexico United: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Loudoun United: 76-90+ (5 goals). New Mexico United: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
New Mexico United sit 4th, while Loudoun United are 21st, and the season-long gap is clear: the visitors have won 10 of 17 matches, compared with just 3 wins in 19 for the hosts. The strongest argument is New Mexico’s current form, with five consecutive victories, 13 goals scored and just 3 conceded. Loudoun have also improved defensively, conceding only 2 goals in their last five league matches, but they draw as many as 64% of their home games and win just 9%. Away from home, the visitors average 1.50 goals per match, compared with Loudoun’s 1.36 at home, and they are also more clinical, converting 15% of their shots compared with 11% for the hosts. Although Loudoun post a higher average xG at home—1.48 versus 1.17—the winning streak and New Mexico’s significantly stronger league position point towards a narrow away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points toward BTTS - No, as Loudoun United have scored just 4 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.8 per game, and in 80% of those fixtures both teams did not score. New Mexico United kept a clean sheet in 38% of their matches this season, while Loudoun failed to score in 11% of games, increasing the risk that the hosts will not find the net. The visitors’ form is undeniably highly attacking, having won their last 5 matches and scored an average of 2.6 goals in them, but their strong finishing supports the scenario of a one-sided result more than it necessarily points to goals from both teams. Additionally, Loudoun conceded only 2 goals in their last five matches, while New Mexico conceded just 3, meaning both teams have recently displayed more effective defensive performances than suggested by the league-average BTTS rate of 53%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals, as this outcome occurred in 67% of Loudoun United’s matches and 75% of New Mexico United’s fixtures throughout the season. The hosts concede just 0.89 goals per game on average, while the visitors concede 1.13, limiting the baseline potential for a very high-scoring game. Loudoun have scored only 4 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.8 per game, and none of those fixtures produced more than 2.5 goals. New Mexico are in an excellent run of five consecutive wins and have recently scored 2.6 goals per game, but their average xG over that period is only 1.41, suggesting that part of this scoring efficiency may be difficult to sustain. The projected total of 2.30 goals still gives a realistic chance of clearing Over 1.5, but clearly supports a scenario with no more than three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: Loudoun were level at the break in 67% of their matches, compared with 50% for New Mexico, while averaging just 1.11 and 0.88 goals respectively in the first half. In their last five matches, both teams slowed the tempo even further before the break, with the hosts scoring 0.2 goals per game and the visitors 0.6, while both teams kept a first-half clean sheet in 80% of those appearances. After the interval, however, the form advantage shifts to New Mexico, who have won all five of their last matches, scoring an average of 2.6 goals and conceding just 0.6. Over the same period, Loudoun scored only 0.8 goals per game, although they remain strong at home over the course of the season, averaging 2.22 points and winning 67% of their matches. The visitors are particularly dangerous after half-time, scoring an average of 2.0 second-half goals in their last five matches compared with Loudoun's 0.6, which is why the HT/FT scenario of a draw at the break and a New Mexico win at full-time has the strongest statistical support.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Loudoun United | New Mexico United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
New Mexico United is 267% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Loudoun United · 2.2 pts / match - New Mexico United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
New Mexico United is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Loudoun United · 1.36 goals / match - New Mexico United
New Mexico United is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.93 goals / match - Loudoun United · 1.07 goals / match - New Mexico United
Loudoun United scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while New Mexico United keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
New Mexico United scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Loudoun United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Loudoun United
Over / Under - New Mexico United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
New Mexico United is 86% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.73 pts / match - Loudoun United · 1.36 pts / match - New Mexico United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Loudoun United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
New Mexico United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Loudoun United
New Mexico United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Loudoun United | Liga | New Mexico United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.13 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 80% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Loudoun United 0 - 0 - 1 New Mexico United. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Loudoun United vs New Mexico United?
The USL Championship match finished Loudoun United 0:0 New Mexico United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Loudoun United vs New Mexico United?
Loudoun United score 1.20 goals per game on average and New Mexico United 1.36. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Loudoun United's matches and 50% of New Mexico United's.
What form are Loudoun United and New Mexico United in?
Over the last 5 games Loudoun United have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and New Mexico United 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Loudoun United vs New Mexico United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


