Louisville City vs Brooklyn FC: match statistics
Louisville City vs Brooklyn FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Louisville City played Brooklyn FC in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: Lynn Family Stadium. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Louisville City: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Brooklyn FC: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Louisville City scores 1.69 and concedes 1.54 goals per match. Brooklyn FC scores 1.00 and concedes 1.82. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Louisville City 54%, Brooklyn FC 45%. Over 2.5: Louisville City 46%, Brooklyn FC 64%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Louisville City has higher xG: 1.89 vs 1.43. Louisville City: 15.6 shots per match, Brooklyn FC: 11.1.
Match halves
Louisville City: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 1.00. Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.36.
Goals by minute
Louisville City: 76-90+ (6 goals). Brooklyn FC: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Louisville City is the clear favorite: their average home xG is 2.07 versus Brooklyn FC’s 1.26 xG on the road, and the hosts average 17.17 shots (5.67 on target) per match compared to the visitors’ 9.8 shots (3.8 on target). This translates into defensive numbers — Louisville concedes 1.5 goals on average at home, while Brooklyn concedes 3.0 goals away and has an average of 1.67 xG against outside their stadium. In the short term the hosts also perform better: in the last 5 matches they scored 11 goals and average 1.4 points per game, whereas the visitors scored 8 goals and average 0.8 points per game over the same period. Brooklyn’s only minor advantage is a slightly higher shot conversion rate (10% vs 9%) and a lower share of away matches without a goal (40% vs 50%), but this does not compensate for the gap in chance creation and defensive stability. Considering the advantage in xG, shot volume and defensive consistency at home, I predict a home win — 1 (probability 70%, draw 18%, away win 12%).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes (70% vs 30%) because the available numbers clearly favor a both-teams-to-score scenario. Brooklyn FC concedes an average of 3.0 goals per season and has 0% clean sheets, with seasonal BTTS for away teams at 60%, strongly suggesting the visitors are vulnerable to conceding. Louisville City scores 1.0 goal seasonally, has seasonal BTTS of 33% and concedes on average 0.83 goals, but in the last 5 matches they score 2.2 goals and concede 1.6 with last-5 xG of 1.76 (seasonal xG 1.55), meaning the home side’s offense is more active than the seasonal average. Additionally, both teams have 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches, the league’s seasonal BTTS is 55%, and over2.5 stats show 100% for away vs 33% for home, which increases the likelihood of a goal-heavy game. Considering the high average goals conceded by the away team (3.0), zero clean sheets (0%) and the uptick in Louisville’s offense (2.2 in last 5), the BTTS scenario is stronger and therefore I choose Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and seasonal data, I expect a match with an elevated goal count: home xG 1.55, away xG 1.26, and xG against of 1.59 for Louisville and 1.67 for Brooklyn, yielding projected 1.61 goals for the home side and 1.43 for the away side (total 3.04). The key signal is Brooklyn’s defense — Brooklyn concedes on average 3.0 goals per game and has 100% of matches Over 2.5 this season, while Louisville has 33% Over 2.5 and clean sheets in 33% of games; this suggests that fixtures involving this opponent frequently produce at least 3 goals. Additionally Louisville averages 12.0 shots (5.17 on target) versus Brooklyn’s 9.8 (3.8 on target), and in the last 5 meetings the two teams combined for 19 goals (Louisville 11, Brooklyn 8), supporting an expectation of at least 2–3 strikes. Considering all this, the most valuable line is Over 2.5 (estimated probability ~76%), while Over 1.5 is virtually certain (~92%) and Over 3.5 is less likely (~34%), therefore I recommend taking the Over at 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast that Louisville City will lead at the break and win the match (scenario 1/1). The hosts have led at half-time in 50% of their games and keep a clean sheet by half-time in 67% of matches, whereas Brooklyn have only a 20% rate of clean halves. Louisville averages xG 1.55 and 5.17 shots on target per game versus the visitors’ 1.26 xG and 3.8 shots on target (1.55 vs 1.26; 5.17 vs 3.8), which corroborates their advantage in chance creation in the first half. Brooklyn FC concedes an average of 3.0 goals per game this season and as many as 2.0 goals after the break, while scoring just 0.4 goals in the second half themselves, so a turnaround looks unlikely. Considering recent form (Louisville 40% wins in the last 5, Brooklyn 20%) and season points per game (1.17 vs 0.2), I assign a 40% probability to 1/1, with the next highest probabilities being 2/2 at 15% and 2/1 at 10%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Louisville City | Brooklyn FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Louisville City is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Louisville City · 0.4 pts / match - Brooklyn FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Louisville City is 69% better for: goals scored per match.
1.69 goals / match - Louisville City · 1 goals / match - Brooklyn FC
Louisville City is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.54 goals / match - Louisville City · 1.82 goals / match - Brooklyn FC
Louisville City scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
Brooklyn FC scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Louisville City keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Louisville City
Over / Under - Brooklyn FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Brooklyn FC is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Louisville City · 1.36 pts / match - Brooklyn FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Louisville City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Brooklyn FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Louisville City
Brooklyn FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Louisville City | Liga | Brooklyn FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.23 | 2.75 | • 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | • 54% | 54% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 28% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 68% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 79% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Louisville City 1 - 0 - 0 Brooklyn FC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Louisville City vs Brooklyn FC?
The USL Championship match finished Louisville City 2:2 Brooklyn FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Louisville City vs Brooklyn FC?
Louisville City score 1.69 goals per game on average and Brooklyn FC 1.00. The USL Championship average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Louisville City's matches and 45% of Brooklyn FC's.
What form are Louisville City and Brooklyn FC in?
Over the last 5 games Louisville City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Brooklyn FC 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Louisville City vs Brooklyn FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


