Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Lugazi Municipal vs KCCA: match statistics

Lugazi Municipal crest
Lugazi Municipal
0 : 3half-time 0:1
KCCA crest
KCCA
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

KCCA displays significantly better form and season results, sitting 3rd in the table with 13 wins, while Lugazi Municipal is down in 12th place with just 4 victories. The visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals, which translates to an impressive 2.4 PPG. Lugazi Municipal is in disastrous form, suffering 4 defeats in their last 5 outings with only 2 goals scored. KCCA dominates in possession (58% vs 49%) and boasts a superior shot conversion rate (11% vs 9%). Additionally, the visitors hold a much better season-long goal difference (31:17 vs 15:27), indicating dominance in both attack and defense. All stats point to a massive advantage for KCCA, making their victory the most probable outcome of this match.

Lugazi Municipal vs KCCA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lugazi Municipal play KCCA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Lugazi Municipal: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. KCCA: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lugazi Municipal scores 0.63 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. KCCA scores 1.53 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lugazi Municipal 30%, KCCA 43%. Over 2.5: Lugazi Municipal 37%, KCCA 50%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

KCCA has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.28. Lugazi Municipal: 8.2 shots per match, KCCA: 11.8.

Match halves

Lugazi Municipal: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.30. KCCA: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Lugazi Municipal: 76-90+ (9 goals). KCCA: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

KCCA displays significantly better form and season results, sitting 3rd in the table with 13 wins, while Lugazi Municipal is down in 12th place with just 4 victories. The visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals, which translates to an impressive 2.4 PPG. Lugazi Municipal is in disastrous form, suffering 4 defeats in their last 5 outings with only 2 goals scored. KCCA dominates in possession (58% vs 49%) and boasts a superior shot conversion rate (11% vs 9%). Additionally, the visitors hold a much better season-long goal difference (31:17 vs 15:27), indicating dominance in both attack and defense. All stats point to a massive advantage for KCCA, making their victory the most probable outcome of this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
16Shots13
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
3Shots on target7
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
1.85xG2.1
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
8Corners3
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
85Dangerous attacks106
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
-1Fouls-1
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
-1Cards-1
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0.63Goals scored / match1.53
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
1.2Goals conceded / match0.73
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
40%Average possession55%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
2.13Shots on target / match4.43
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.2Shots per match11.77
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
2.13Shots on target4.43
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
7.7%Shot conversion13%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
40%Possession55%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
1.28xG for1.68
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
1.74xG against1.13
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

Shooting quality

Lugazi Municipal: BalancedKCCA: Efficient finishing
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
Accuracy (shots on target)26%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KCCA is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Lugazi Municipal · 2.2 pts / match - KCCA

Lugazi Municipal
WLDDL
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-15
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
KCCA
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
63% W17% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-5-6
2.07 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KCCA is 143% better for: goals scored per match.

0.63 goals / match - Lugazi Municipal · 1.53 goals / match - KCCA

KCCA is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Lugazi Municipal · 0.73 goals / match - KCCA

Lugazi Municipal scoring profile: more difficult

Lugazi Municipal scores in 37% of matches (11 of 30 matches), while KCCA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

KCCA scoring profile: strong

KCCA scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Lugazi Municipal keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

19Goals scored (season)46
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
36Goals conceded (season)22
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
1.83Average goals in match2.27
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
2Goals scored (last 5)10
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

How often they score at least...

37%1 goal73%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
13%2 goals50%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
7%3 goals20%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
3%4 goals10%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal60%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
37%2 goals10%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
13%3 goals3%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
3%4 goals0%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time10%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
13%Scored in both halves37%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0%BTTS - last 560%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KCCA is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Lugazi Municipal · 1.73 pts / match - KCCA

Lugazi Municipal - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing
KCCA - half-time state
47% leading33% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.73
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.77
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.07
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
63%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
77%No goal before half-time47%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.63
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0.3Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
0.9Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
53%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA
77%No goal after half-time43%
Lugazi MunicipalKCCA

Lugazi Municipal - second-half results

13% W53% R33% P
33
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KCCA - second-half results

43% W33% R23% P
52
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lugazi Municipal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
KCCA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lugazi Municipal
ScoredConceded
4
9
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
4
31-45
0
8
46-60
0
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

KCCA
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
8
2
16-30
10
6
31-45
6
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
12
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lugazi Municipal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
47% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
47%

KCCA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
184%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

Lugazi MunicipalLigaKCCA
Average goals in match 1.832.09 2.27
Both teams scored 30%38% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%35% 50%
Clean sheets 33%39% 40%
Goal before half-time 53%59% 73%
Goal after half-time 57%62% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lugazi Municipal 0 - 1 - 0 KCCA. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KCCA
0 : 0
Lugazi Municipal

FAQ

What was the result of Lugazi Municipal vs KCCA?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Lugazi Municipal 0:3 KCCA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lugazi Municipal vs KCCA?

Lugazi Municipal score 0.63 goals per game on average and KCCA 1.53. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Lugazi Municipal's matches and 43% of KCCA's.

What form are Lugazi Municipal and KCCA in?

Over the last 5 games Lugazi Municipal have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KCCA 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lugazi Municipal vs KCCA?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lugazi Municipal vs KCCA: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.