Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of 12 September 2026

Lumezzane vs AlbinoLeffe: match statistics

Lumezzane crest
Lumezzane
1 : 1half-time 0:0
AlbinoLeffe crest
AlbinoLeffe
135%(2.30)
X35%(3.20)
230%(2.75)

Statistical analysis indicates a very closely contested match between Lumezzane and AlbinoLeffe. The hosts show solid home form with a 38% win rate and a positive goal difference (+5), however their recent results are inconsistent (1-3-1 in the last 5 matches). AlbinoLeffe demonstrates better current form with 3 wins in the last 5 games and a higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.2), but away from home they record only a 25% win rate and a negative goal difference (-2). A key factor is the visitors' high away draw percentage (44%), which, combined with the hosts' tendency to share points at home (31% draws), suggests a draw. Similar xG values, possession, and efficiency for both teams further confirm the forecast for a draw in this evenly matched encounter.

Lumezzane vs AlbinoLeffe: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lumezzane played AlbinoLeffe in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Lumezzane: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. AlbinoLeffe: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lumezzane scores 1.06 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. AlbinoLeffe scores 1.30 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lumezzane 48%, AlbinoLeffe 58%. Over 2.5: Lumezzane 33%, AlbinoLeffe 52%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Lumezzane has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.32. Lumezzane: 9.6 shots per match, AlbinoLeffe: 10.1.

Match halves

Lumezzane: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.55. AlbinoLeffe: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Lumezzane: 61-75 (10 goals). AlbinoLeffe: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a very closely contested match between Lumezzane and AlbinoLeffe. The hosts show solid home form with a 38% win rate and a positive goal difference (+5), however their recent results are inconsistent (1-3-1 in the last 5 matches). AlbinoLeffe demonstrates better current form with 3 wins in the last 5 games and a higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.2), but away from home they record only a 25% win rate and a negative goal difference (-2). A key factor is the visitors' high away draw percentage (44%), which, combined with the hosts' tendency to share points at home (31% draws), suggests a draw. Similar xG values, possession, and efficiency for both teams further confirm the forecast for a draw in this evenly matched encounter.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In terms of seasonal trends, BTTS is frequent for both sides: Lumezzane have a 59% BTTS rate, while AlbinoLeffe stand at 56%, both considerably above the league average (49%). Goals and xG profiles support goals for both teams: the hosts generate 1.48 xG, while the visitors concede a high 1.54 xG, increasing the likelihood that Lumezzane will score. On the other hand, Lumezzane concede an average of 1.29 goals and have a low clean sheet ratio (18%), providing AlbinoLeffe with a realistic pathway to score despite their moderate xG (1.16). A mitigating factor is the recent form over the last 5 matches, where the BTTS rate has dropped to 40% (Lumezzane) and 20% (AlbinoLeffe), with average goals conceded down to 0.6 each. However, the balance of signals leans slightly towards BTTS - Yes, as the full-season and defensive data (high GA for both teams: 34 and 43) suggest greater vulnerability to conceding than indicated by the short-term snapshot.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The seasonal profile points towards a match closer to 2-3 goals: Lumezzane (1.41 goals scored, 1.29 conceded) and AlbinoLeffe (1.19/1.31) produce a combined level near the league average of 2.28, but with slight potential for an uptick. The xG data supports moderate productivity (xG for: 1.48 vs 1.16) and the fact that the visitors allow high-quality chances (xG against 1.54), which raises expectations for the hosts. At the same time, the distribution of results this season limits the risk of a 'high' over: Over 3.5 occurs in only 35% of Lumezzane's matches and 31% of AlbinoLeffe's, while Under 4.5 is very frequent (88% and 94%). The last 5 matches further cool the Over 2.5 market (0% for the hosts and 20% for the visitors) given low average goals scored/conceded (0.6–1.0 scored and 0.6 conceded). Therefore, the strongest signal is Under 3.5, which combines a high frequency in the seasonal data with relatively low scoring volatility in current form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time, as AlbinoLeffe draws very frequently at HT (44%), and both teams play cautious first halves (average first-half goals: 1.18 vs 1.13) with high clean sheet percentages in the first half (53% and 56%). Additionally, BTTS in the first half is low (18-19%), supporting a 0-0/1-1 scenario at the break. In the full match, Lumezzane's quality advantage is moderate (PPG 1.41 vs 1.19, higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.16), but AlbinoLeffe has a high share of draws this season (44%) and solid clean sheets (38%), which limits the probability of clear dominance by the hosts. The last 5 matches suggest parity (Lumezzane with many draws, AlbinoLeffe with a better PPG of 1.8), so it is safest to model a draw at full-time as well. Therefore, I rate the X/X variant highest, with an alternative towards X/1 if Lumezzane leverages their shot and xG advantage in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
11Shots10
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
4Shots on target3
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
1.99xG1.52
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
11Corners5
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
137Dangerous attacks90
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
9Fouls9
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
3Cards1
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
1.06Goals scored / match1.3
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
1.03Goals conceded / match1.3
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
49%Average possession53%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
3.48Shots on target / match3.52
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.55Shots per match10.06
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
3.48Shots on target3.52
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
11.1%Shot conversion13%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
49%Possession53%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
1.35xG for1.32
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
1.7xG against1.41
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

Shooting quality

Lumezzane: BalancedAlbinoLeffe: Efficient finishing
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AlbinoLeffe is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Lumezzane · 1.8 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe

Lumezzane
DLDWD
Season result split
33% W36% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-10
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 2.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
AlbinoLeffe
LWWLW
Season result split
33% W30% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-12
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-5
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AlbinoLeffe is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Lumezzane · 1.3 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe

Lumezzane is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Lumezzane · 1.3 goals / match - AlbinoLeffe

Lumezzane scoring profile: very strong

Lumezzane scores in 76% of matches (25 of 33 matches), while AlbinoLeffe keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).

AlbinoLeffe scoring profile: strong

AlbinoLeffe scores in 76% of matches (25 of 33 matches), while Lumezzane keeps a clean sheet in 39% (13 of 33 matches).

35Goals scored (season)43
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
34Goals conceded (season)43
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
2.09Average goals in match2.61
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
3Goals scored (last 5)5
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal76%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
21%2 goals42%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
9%3 goals12%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
0%4 goals0%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal73%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
27%2 goals39%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
9%3 goals12%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
3%4 goals3%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time18%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
6%BTTS in both halves3%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
18%Scored in both halves24%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
40%BTTS - last 520%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lumezzane is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - Lumezzane · 1.18 pts / match - AlbinoLeffe

Lumezzane - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing
AlbinoLeffe - half-time state
27% leading36% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)1.18
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.61
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.15
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
67%Clean sheet before half-time55%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
52%No goal before half-time61%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.21
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.45
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
58%Clean sheet after half-time48%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe
55%No goal after half-time39%
LumezzaneAlbinoLeffe

Lumezzane - second-half results

24% W55% D21% L
48
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AlbinoLeffe - second-half results

27% W39% D33% L
39
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lumezzane - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
AlbinoLeffe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lumezzane
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
6
5
31-45
0
4
46-60
10
8
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

AlbinoLeffe
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
6
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
10
5
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lumezzane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

AlbinoLeffe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

LumezzaneLigaAlbinoLeffe
Average goals in match 2.092.28 2.61
Both teams scored 48%49% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%41% 52%
Clean sheets 39%30% 27%
Goal before half-time 70%66% 67%
Goal after half-time 61%71% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.28
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LumezzaneYellow cardFabrizio Paghera
  2. AlbinoLeffeSubstitutionOn: Thomas SimonelliOff: Alessandro Garattoni
  3. LumezzaneSubstitutionOn: Mattia IoriOff: Matteo Ferro
  4. LumezzaneYellow cardRiccardo Stivanello
  5. LumezzaneYellow cardJacopo Deratti
  6. AlbinoLeffeYellow cardGiacomo Sciacca
  7. LumezzaneSubstitutionOn: Matteo MottaOff: Sasha Sam Valentino Mancini
  8. AlbinoLeffeGoalEnrico GianniniAssist: Andrea Astrologo
  9. AlbinoLeffeSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo SorrentinoOff: Andrea De Paoli
  10. LumezzaneSubstitutionOn: Gaetano MonachelloOff: Fabrizio Paghera
  11. AlbinoLeffeSubstitutionOn: Alessandro LombardiOff: Giacomo Sali
  12. LumezzaneGoalGaetano MonachelloAssist: Mattia Iori

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lumezzane 1 - 0 - 0 AlbinoLeffe. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Lumezzane vs AlbinoLeffe?

The Serie C Group A match finished Lumezzane 1:1 AlbinoLeffe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lumezzane vs AlbinoLeffe?

Lumezzane score 1.06 goals per game on average and AlbinoLeffe 1.30. The Serie C Group A average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Lumezzane's matches and 58% of AlbinoLeffe's.

What form are Lumezzane and AlbinoLeffe in?

Over the last 5 games Lumezzane have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and AlbinoLeffe 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lumezzane vs AlbinoLeffe?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lumezzane vs AlbinoLeffe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.