Switzerland - Super LeagueswissporarenaData current as of 03 November 2026

Luzern vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Luzern crest
Luzern
5 : 1half-time 2:0
Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper

Luzern vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Luzern played Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: swissporarena. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Luzern: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Grasshopper: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Luzern scores 1.50 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.50 and concedes 2.38. League average: 3.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Luzern 75%, Grasshopper 75%. Over 2.5: Luzern 75%, Grasshopper 63%. League level: BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 77%.

xG, shots and style

Luzern has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.62. Luzern: 16.0 shots per match, Grasshopper: 14.8.

Match halves

Luzern: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.00. Grasshopper: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Luzern: 46-60 (4 goals). Grasshopper: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.85 goals per match, BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 77%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 4-0-0. Average goals 5.25, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Luzern hold a slight home advantage: they average 2.05 xG at home compared with Grasshopper’s 1.54 xG away, while also recording 20.25 shots per match against their opponents’ 14.25. The hosts have scored in every home fixture and average 1.50 goals there, whereas Grasshopper score 1.25 goals away from home. The visitors are, however, in better recent form, having won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 12 goals and conceding only 7, compared with Luzern’s 9 scored and 9 conceded. Both defences allow an average of 2 goals in their respective home or away matches, so an open game with goals at both ends should be expected. However, the greater volume and quality of chances created by Luzern in front of their home crowd point to a narrow home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is strongly supported by the season data: both teams have scored in 67% of Luzern’s matches and 75% of Grasshopper’s, compared with a league average of 71%. Neither side has yet recorded a match without scoring, while both concede 2.00 goals per game, significantly increasing the likelihood of a response from the opposition. Luzern average 1.95 xG, while Grasshopper average 1.54 xG; both defences also allow 1.75 and 1.59 xG, respectively. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored and conceded 1.8 goals per game, while the visitors have scored 2.4 and allowed 1.4 goals per match. The only negative factor for this pick is Grasshopper’s 40% BTTS rate in their last five appearances, but the volume of chances and the teams’ recurring defensive problems support a goal for both sides.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Luzern average 1.67 goals scored, while Grasshopper concede 2.00 per match, with the hosts creating chances worth 1.95 xG. The visitors score an average of 1.25 goals, but Luzern’s defense allows opponents 2.00 goals per game, while Grasshopper’s xG stands at a solid 1.54. In their last five matches, both teams have consistently been involved in open games: Luzern recorded a combined average of 3.6 goals per match, and Grasshopper 3.8. At least two goals were scored in all of Luzern’s matches and in 75% of Grasshopper’s games, while the league average of 3.71 goals further supports a high-scoring game. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as both sides’ attacking profiles and defensive weaknesses clearly reduce the risk of a 0:0 or 1:0 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Luzern has a clearly stronger first-half profile at home: they have led at the break in 2 of their 3 matches, averaging 0.67 goals scored and conceding no goals before half-time. Away from home, Grasshopper concede an average of 1.0 goal in the first half and have led at the break only once in 4 matches. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 17.67 shots and 6.33 on target compared with their opponents’ 14.25 and 3.5, while their average xG stands at 1.95 versus Grasshopper’s 1.54. Both defences concede 2.0 goals per match, so goals for the visitors after the interval are possible; however, Luzern’s superior chance creation and stronger first-half results make the HT/FT 1/1 outcome—Luzern leading at the break and winning at full-time—the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
LuzernGrasshopper
23Shots21
LuzernGrasshopper
11Shots on target6
LuzernGrasshopper
2.61xG2.08
LuzernGrasshopper
5Corners8
LuzernGrasshopper
55Dangerous attacks47
LuzernGrasshopper
13Fouls5
LuzernGrasshopper
2Cards2
LuzernGrasshopper

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.5
LuzernGrasshopper
2.13Goals conceded / match2.38
LuzernGrasshopper
44%Average possession44%
LuzernGrasshopper
4.63Shots on target / match4.5
LuzernGrasshopper

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match14.75
LuzernGrasshopper
4.63Shots on target4.5
LuzernGrasshopper
9.4%Shot conversion10.2%
LuzernGrasshopper
44%Possession44%
LuzernGrasshopper
1.65xG for1.62
LuzernGrasshopper
2.01xG against1.68
LuzernGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Luzern: AttackingGrasshopper: Attacking
LuzernGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)29%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Luzern is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Luzern · 1.4 pts / match - Grasshopper

Luzern
WDWDL
Season result split
25% W38% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-3
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 at home
2-0-2
LWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Grasshopper
LWDWL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
DLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Luzern is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.13 goals / match - Luzern · 2.38 goals / match - Grasshopper

Luzern scoring profile: very strong

Luzern scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 100% of matches (8 of 8 matches), while Luzern keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

12Goals scored (season)12
LuzernGrasshopper
17Goals conceded (season)19
LuzernGrasshopper
3.63Average goals in match3.88
LuzernGrasshopper
9Goals scored (last 5)9
LuzernGrasshopper
9Goals conceded (last 5)12
LuzernGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal100%
LuzernGrasshopper
50%2 goals50%
LuzernGrasshopper
13%3 goals0%
LuzernGrasshopper
0%4 goals0%
LuzernGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal75%
LuzernGrasshopper
63%2 goals63%
LuzernGrasshopper
50%3 goals38%
LuzernGrasshopper
13%4 goals38%
LuzernGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time38%
LuzernGrasshopper
13%BTTS in both halves13%
LuzernGrasshopper
13%Scored in both halves25%
LuzernGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
LuzernGrasshopper
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LuzernGrasshopper
80%BTTS - last 560%
LuzernGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
LuzernGrasshopper
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
LuzernGrasshopper
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
LuzernGrasshopper

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
LuzernGrasshopper
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
LuzernGrasshopper
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
LuzernGrasshopper

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 117% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - Luzern · 1.63 pts / match - Grasshopper

Luzern - half-time state
13% leading38% draw50% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.63
LuzernGrasshopper
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.88
LuzernGrasshopper
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
LuzernGrasshopper
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.5
LuzernGrasshopper
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
LuzernGrasshopper
50%No goal before half-time25%
LuzernGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1
LuzernGrasshopper
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
LuzernGrasshopper
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1.75
LuzernGrasshopper
2.25Average goals (2nd half)2.38
LuzernGrasshopper
25%Clean sheet after half-time38%
LuzernGrasshopper
50%No goal after half-time50%
LuzernGrasshopper

Luzern - second-half results

38% W25% D38% L
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.1

Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Luzern - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.8
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Luzern
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
88%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Luzern

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

LuzernLigaGrasshopper
Average goals in match▼ 3.633.85• 3.88
Both teams scored▲ 75%73%▲ 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 75%77%▼ 63%
Clean sheets▼ 13%15%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%79%▲ 88%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%92%▼ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.85
Average goals per match
73%
Both teams scored
77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
15%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / match
1.96
Away goals / match
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
92%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
44%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LuzernGoalTyron OwusuAssist: Matteo Di Giusto
  2. GrasshopperYellow cardAmir Abrashi
  3. LuzernYellow cardLeonardo Bertone
  4. GrasshopperYellow cardNico Rissi
  5. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Samuele BengondoOff: Giotto Morandi
  6. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Kenzo GoudmijnOff: Óscar Clemente Mues
  7. LuzernYellow cardAndrejs Cigaņiks
  8. GrasshopperGoalSamuele BengondoAssist: Young-Jun Lee
  9. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: John HiltonOff: Nico Rissi
  10. LuzernSubstitutionOn: Nando ToggenburgOff: Daniel Mikołajewski

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Luzern 4 - 0 - 0 Grasshopper. Average goals 5.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Grasshopper Club Zürich
1 : 2
FC Luzern
FC Luzern
4 : 3
Grasshopper Club Zürich
FC Luzern
6 : 0
Grasshopper Club Zürich
Grasshopper Club Zürich
2 : 3
FC Luzern

FAQ

What was the result of Luzern vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Luzern 5:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Luzern and Grasshopper?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Luzern won 4, Grasshopper won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Luzern vs Grasshopper?

Luzern score 1.50 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.50. The Super League average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Luzern's matches and 75% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Luzern and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Luzern have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Grasshopper 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Luzern vs Grasshopper?

The statistical background for Luzern vs Grasshopper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.