Lyngby vs AGF: match statistics
Lyngby vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lyngby played AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Lyngby Stadion. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Lyngby: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. AGF: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lyngby scores 2.00 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. AGF scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lyngby 100%, AGF 100%. Over 2.5: Lyngby 100%, AGF 0%. League level: BTTS 83%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Lyngby has higher xG: 2.11 vs 1.47. Lyngby: 21.0 shots per match, AGF: 13.0.
Match halves
Lyngby: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00. AGF: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Lyngby: 31-45+ (2 goals). AGF: 76-90+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Superliga: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 83%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win — AGF. AGF scored 14 goals in the last 5 matches versus Lyngby’s 8, indicating a clear offensive advantage for the visitors. The visitors have a form line of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss in their last five fixtures and average 2.0 points per game, while the hosts have 2 wins and 3 losses and average 1.2 points per game, confirming the form gap. Defensively AGF conceded 7 goals in those 5 matches and Lyngby 8, so a slight defensive edge also favors AGF; additionally AGF sits 4th in the table versus Lyngby’s 11th position. Lack of detailed xG and shot data forces reliance on goals scored and conceded, therefore I assess chances as 60% for the visitors, 25% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes selection appears more likely due to a high league BTTS rate of 83% and Lyngby’s seasonal BTTS rate of 100% (AGF seasonal data are zero and less reliable). In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS in 60% each: Lyngby averages 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, AGF averages 2.8 scored and 1.4 conceded, indicating goal exchange from both sides. xG over the last 5 matches is 1.85 for Lyngby and 1.61 for AGF, with xG against at 1.32 and 1.51 respectively, meaning both sides create and concede chances. Additionally, Lyngby have scored 8 and conceded 8 in their last five fixtures, while AGF have scored 14 and conceded 7, confirming the offensive nature of their games. Based on this I assess BTTS - Yes at 78% and No Goal at 22%, therefore I recommend taking Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project Lyngby to score approximately 1.68 goals and AGF about 1.47 goals, giving a total of 3.15 goals. These values come from comparing the last 5 matches: Lyngby has an average xG of 1.85, AGF conceded an average of 1.51 xG in those games, while AGF generates 1.61 xG against Lyngby’s defense at 1.32 xG. The expected 3.15 goals is 0.65 above the 2.5 line, and both teams recorded 60% of matches over 2.5 goals in their last 5 fixtures, so Over 2.5 has a clear edge. Additionally, Lyngby at home averages 13 shots and 3 shots on target per match; seasonally 100% of their home games exceeded 1.5 goals and in 100% of home matches both teams scored, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals. Based on this, I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the optimal line: the projected 3.15 goals and the historical 60% Over 2.5 rate across the last 5 matches for both teams provide the strongest and most consistent signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches AGF have led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and scored an average of 1.2 goals by half-time, while Lyngby average 0.8 goals per half. After 90 minutes the visitors have won 60% of their last 5 matches (3 of 5) versus Lyngby’s 40% wins (2 of 5), and the average goals in the last 5 matches are 4.2 for AGF vs 3.2 for Lyngby, indicating an offensive advantage for the visitors. Additionally, in the league 83% of matches finish with both teams scoring (BTTS 83%), which increases the chance of a goalscoring game and decreases the likelihood of a goalless draw. Taking this into account, the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at half-time and winning at full-time (2/2) — historically AGF led at the break and won the match in 3 of 5 cases, so I assign the highest probability to this scenario. The second strongest option is a draw at half-time and an AGF victory at full-time (X/2) due to the average half-time goals of 0.8–1.2 and the high league goal percentage; I assign lower probability to scenarios with a Lyngby lead or a full-time draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lyngby | AGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lyngby is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Lyngby · 1 goals / match - AGF
AGF is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.
3 goals / match - Lyngby · 1 goals / match - AGF
Lyngby scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
AGF scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Lyngby keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lyngby
Over / Under - AGF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lyngby is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / match - Lyngby · 1 pts / match - AGF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lyngby - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
AGF - second-half results
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 100% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lyngby
AGF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Lyngby | Liga | AGF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 5.00 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 33% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 8% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- AGFYellow cardChristian Storch
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Lyngby vs AGF?
The Superliga match finished Lyngby 2:2 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lyngby vs AGF?
Lyngby score 2.00 goals per game on average and AGF 1.00. The Superliga average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Lyngby's matches and 100% of AGF's.
What form are Lyngby and AGF in?
Over the last 5 games Lyngby have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and AGF 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lyngby vs AGF?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lyngby vs AGF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


