Denmark - 1st DivisionData current as of 12 September 2026

Lyngby vs Kolding IF: match statistics

Lyngby crest
Lyngby
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Kolding IF crest
Kolding IF

Lyngby vs Kolding IF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lyngby played Kolding IF in 1st Division (Denmark). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Lyngby: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Kolding IF: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lyngby scores 2.13 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Kolding IF scores 1.30 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lyngby 57%, Kolding IF 52%. Over 2.5: Lyngby 65%, Kolding IF 48%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Lyngby has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.49. Lyngby: 13.7 shots per match, Kolding IF: 13.0.

Match halves

Lyngby: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.22. Kolding IF: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Lyngby: 76-90+ (12 goals). Kolding IF: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1st Division: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a Lyngby win (1) based on clear statistical superiority in attack and home form. Lyngby lead the table with 49 goals this season versus Kolding’s 30; at home they average 2.09 goals per game compared to Kolding’s 1.18 away. Defensively the hosts concede 0.91 goals at home with average xG against 1.07, while visitors concede 1.09 goals away with xG against 1.43, indicating Lyngby better limits the quality of chances. Lyngby averages 5.09 shots on target and 14.45 shots per home game, has only 9% of matches without a goal and 45% clean sheets, whereas Kolding away averages 4 shots on target, 12 shots and 27% of games without scoring. Form also favours the hosts — Lyngby have scored 12 goals and averaged 2 points in the last 5 matches (record 3–1–1), while Kolding have 6 goals and 1.6 points (record 2–2–1); therefore a Lyngby win is expected.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Lyngby has a seasonal BTTS 58% (60% in the last 5 games), while Kolding is at 45% (40% in the last 5), with the league average BTTS 55%, slightly favoring a both teams to score scenario. Lyngby averages 1.42 goals per game (xG 1.59) with 13.83 shots, whereas Kolding records 1.18 goals (xG 1.39) and 12.0 shots — both sides regularly create chances. The share of matches without scoring is 17% for Lyngby and 27% for Kolding; the simple product (0.83×0.73) yields about 0.606, i.e. ~61% probability that both teams score at least once. In the last 5 matches Lyngby scored 12 and conceded 6 (2.4 and 1.2 per game), and Kolding 6 and 4 (1.2 and 0.8), highlighting Lyngby’s clear attacking strength and Kolding’s sufficient efficiency to respond. Therefore I forecast 62% for BTTS - Yes vs 38% for No, noting xG 1.59 vs 1.39 and relatively low clean sheets 33% (Lyngby) and 36% (Kolding), which together argue more strongly for both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average xG indicates high goal potential: Lyngby has xG_for 1.59, Kolding 1.39, and averaging the home attack (1.59) with the away defense (xG_against_away = 1.43) yields ~1.51 expected goals for Lyngby, while averaging Kolding’s attack (1.39) with Lyngby’s defense (xG_against_home = 1.37) yields ~1.38 for Kolding, totaling ~2.89 goals. In the last 5 matches Lyngby scored 12 goals (2.4 per match), Kolding 6 goals (1.2 per match), which together give 3.6 goals per match in short-form and increase the probability of outcomes above 1.5 and 2.5. Seasonal metrics confirm a goal-prone trend: over 1.5 occurred in 67% of Lyngby’s home games and 73% of Kolding’s away games, while over 0.5 is 92% and 91% respectively — virtually no 0-0 draws. The 2.5 line has a moderate edge (seasonal 50%/45% and expected total xG 2.89), whereas 3.5 is less likely (seasonal over 3.5 at 25% and 18%), therefore the strongest signal is over 1.5 (76% chance) with moderate support for over 2.5 (62%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Lyngby has a clear offensive edge and creates more chances: xG 1.59 versus 1.39 for Kolding and on average 13.83 shots versus 12.0, with the same 10% conversion rate, which favors the home side. The hosts score on average 1.42 goals per game vs 1.18 for the visitors and lead at the break in 42% of their home matches; in the last 5 games Lyngby led after 45 minutes in 2 of 5 (40%) while Kolding did so in only 1 of 5 (20%). The final record also favors Lyngby: they win 50% of home matches (60% in the last 5), while Kolding win 27% overall (40% in the last 5), hence a higher probability of a home victory after 90 minutes. Additionally, the hosts scored 10 first-half goals in the last 5 matches versus 3 for the visitors, and average xG against is 1.37 (Lyngby) vs 1.43 (Kolding), suggesting the visitors have slightly weaker chance creation; consequently the strongest signal is Lyngby leading at the break and holding the win (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
LyngbyKolding IF
20Shots9
LyngbyKolding IF
10Shots on target3
LyngbyKolding IF
2.43xG1.14
LyngbyKolding IF
5Corners7
LyngbyKolding IF
65Dangerous attacks49
LyngbyKolding IF
5Fouls19
LyngbyKolding IF
0Cards2
LyngbyKolding IF

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.13Goals scored / match1.3
LyngbyKolding IF
1.13Goals conceded / match1.04
LyngbyKolding IF
53%Average possession53%
LyngbyKolding IF
4.96Shots on target / match4.22
LyngbyKolding IF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.7Shots per match12.96
LyngbyKolding IF
4.96Shots on target4.22
LyngbyKolding IF
15.6%Shot conversion10.1%
LyngbyKolding IF
53%Possession53%
LyngbyKolding IF
1.64xG for1.49
LyngbyKolding IF
1.23xG against1.4
LyngbyKolding IF

Shooting quality

Lyngby: Efficient finishingKolding IF: Balanced
LyngbyKolding IF
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lyngby is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Lyngby · 1.6 pts / match - Kolding IF

Lyngby
WWWDL
Season result split
52% W26% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-5
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kolding IF
LWDWD
Season result split
39% W30% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-7
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lyngby is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

2.13 goals / match - Lyngby · 1.3 goals / match - Kolding IF

Kolding IF is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Lyngby · 1.04 goals / match - Kolding IF

Lyngby scoring profile: very strong

Lyngby scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Kolding IF keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

Kolding IF scoring profile: strong

Kolding IF scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Lyngby keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

49Goals scored (season)30
LyngbyKolding IF
26Goals conceded (season)24
LyngbyKolding IF
3.26Average goals in match2.35
LyngbyKolding IF
12Goals scored (last 5)6
LyngbyKolding IF
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
LyngbyKolding IF

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal78%
LyngbyKolding IF
74%2 goals39%
LyngbyKolding IF
39%3 goals13%
LyngbyKolding IF
13%4 goals0%
LyngbyKolding IF

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal65%
LyngbyKolding IF
35%2 goals30%
LyngbyKolding IF
13%3 goals9%
LyngbyKolding IF
0%4 goals0%
LyngbyKolding IF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time4%
LyngbyKolding IF
9%BTTS in both halves0%
LyngbyKolding IF
52%Scored in both halves22%
LyngbyKolding IF

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
LyngbyKolding IF
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
LyngbyKolding IF
60%BTTS - last 540%
LyngbyKolding IF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
LyngbyKolding IF
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
LyngbyKolding IF
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
LyngbyKolding IF

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
LyngbyKolding IF
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
LyngbyKolding IF
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
LyngbyKolding IF

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kolding IF is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / match - Lyngby · 1.61 pts / match - Kolding IF

Lyngby - half-time state
43% leading22% draw35% trailing
Kolding IF - half-time state
43% leading30% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per match (1st half)1.61
LyngbyKolding IF
0.91Goals scored (1st half)0.65
LyngbyKolding IF
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
LyngbyKolding IF
1.61Average goals (1st half)1
LyngbyKolding IF
43%Clean sheet before half-time74%
LyngbyKolding IF
35%No goal before half-time52%
LyngbyKolding IF

After half-time (2nd half)

2.17Points per match (2nd half)1.39
LyngbyKolding IF
1.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
LyngbyKolding IF
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
LyngbyKolding IF
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.35
LyngbyKolding IF
65%Clean sheet after half-time52%
LyngbyKolding IF
26%No goal after half-time48%
LyngbyKolding IF

Lyngby - second-half results

65% W22% D13% L
35
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kolding IF - second-half results

35% W35% D30% L
37
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 39%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lyngby - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kolding IF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lyngby
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
7
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
4
46-60
8
1
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Kolding IF
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
8
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lyngby

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Kolding IF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).

Teams vs league

LyngbyLigaKolding IF
Average goals in match 3.262.71 2.35
Both teams scored 57%54% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%52% 48%
Clean sheets 35%27% 35%
Goal before half-time 91%72% 70%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kolding IFYellow cardJeffrey Papayaw Adjei-Broni
  2. LyngbySubstitutionOn: Frederik GytkjærOff: Isak Thorvaldsson
  3. LyngbySubstitutionOn: Mihajlo IvančevićOff: Renzo Tytens
  4. Kolding IFYellow cardVladislav Morozov
  5. LyngbySubstitutionOn: Bror BlumeOff: Gustav Leone Fraulo
  6. Kolding IFGoalMagnus Døj
  7. Kolding IFSubstitutionOn: Ari LeifssonOff: Magnus Saaby
  8. LyngbyGoalFrederik GytkjærAssist: Bror Blume

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jacob RasmussenMatches officiated: 15
2.93Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins13%Draws40%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Lyngby 2 - 0 - 0 Kolding IF. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Lyngby Boldklub
2 : 0
Kolding IF
Kolding IF
2 : 3
Lyngby Boldklub

FAQ

What was the result of Lyngby vs Kolding IF?

The 1st Division match finished Lyngby 3:1 Kolding IF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lyngby and Kolding IF?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lyngby won 2, Kolding IF won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lyngby vs Kolding IF?

Lyngby score 2.13 goals per game on average and Kolding IF 1.30. The 1st Division average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Lyngby's matches and 52% of Kolding IF's.

What form are Lyngby and Kolding IF in?

Over the last 5 games Lyngby have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kolding IF 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lyngby vs Kolding IF?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lyngby vs Kolding IF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.