Maccabi Haifa vs Beitar Jerusalem: match statistics
Maccabi Haifa vs Beitar Jerusalem: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Maccabi Haifa played Beitar Jerusalem in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 22 December 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Maccabi Haifa: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Beitar Jerusalem: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Maccabi Haifa scores 1.86 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Beitar Jerusalem scores 2.50 and concedes 1.21. League average: 3.16 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Maccabi Haifa 57%, Beitar Jerusalem 71%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Haifa 50%, Beitar Jerusalem 71%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Beitar Jerusalem has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.69. Maccabi Haifa: 14.9 shots per match, Beitar Jerusalem: 15.1.
Match halves
Maccabi Haifa: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.29. Beitar Jerusalem: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.71.
Goals by minute
Maccabi Haifa: 46-60 (9 goals). Beitar Jerusalem: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Maccabi Haifa | Beitar Jerusalem | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beitar Jerusalem is 18% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa · 2.6 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beitar Jerusalem is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
1.86 goals / match - Maccabi Haifa · 2.5 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Maccabi Haifa is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Maccabi Haifa · 1.21 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Maccabi Haifa scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Beitar Jerusalem keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
Beitar Jerusalem scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Maccabi Haifa keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maccabi Haifa
Over / Under - Beitar Jerusalem
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Haifa is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.64 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa · 1.29 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maccabi Haifa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Beitar Jerusalem - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +10 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Maccabi Haifa
Beitar Jerusalem
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Maccabi Haifa | Liga | Beitar Jerusalem | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.86 | 3.16 | ▲ 3.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 61% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 62% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 24% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 66% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Maccabi Haifa 0 - 1 - 0 Beitar Jerusalem. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Maccabi Haifa vs Beitar Jerusalem?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Maccabi Haifa 1:2 Beitar Jerusalem. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Haifa vs Beitar Jerusalem?
Maccabi Haifa score 1.86 goals per game on average and Beitar Jerusalem 2.50. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Maccabi Haifa's matches and 71% of Beitar Jerusalem's.
What form are Maccabi Haifa and Beitar Jerusalem in?
Over the last 5 games Maccabi Haifa have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Beitar Jerusalem 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Haifa vs Beitar Jerusalem?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Maccabi Haifa vs Beitar Jerusalem: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.