Maccabi Haifa vs Hapoel Be'er Sheva: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Maccabi Haifa vs Hapoel Be'er Sheva: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Maccabi Haifa play Hapoel Be'er Sheva in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match date is 26 October 2026.
Current form
Maccabi Haifa: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Hapoel Be'er Sheva: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Maccabi Haifa scores 2.57 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Hapoel Be'er Sheva scores 1.71 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.90 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Maccabi Haifa 86%, Hapoel Be'er Sheva 57%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Haifa 100%, Hapoel Be'er Sheva 57%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Haifa has higher xG: 2.16 vs 1.84. Maccabi Haifa: 19.6 shots per match, Hapoel Be'er Sheva: 14.7.
Match halves
Maccabi Haifa: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.86. Hapoel Be'er Sheva: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.29.
Goals by minute
Maccabi Haifa: 61-75 (6 goals). Hapoel Be'er Sheva: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Maccabi Haifa | Hapoel Be'er Sheva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maccabi Haifa is 25% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa · 2.4 pts / match - Hapoel Be'er Sheva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Haifa is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
2.57 goals / match - Maccabi Haifa · 1.71 goals / match - Hapoel Be'er Sheva
Hapoel Be'er Sheva is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - Maccabi Haifa · 1.14 goals / match - Hapoel Be'er Sheva
Maccabi Haifa scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Hapoel Be'er Sheva keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
Hapoel Be'er Sheva scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Maccabi Haifa keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maccabi Haifa
Over / Under - Hapoel Be'er Sheva
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Haifa is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa · 1.29 pts / match - Hapoel Be'er Sheva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maccabi Haifa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 86%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hapoel Be'er Sheva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Maccabi Haifa
Hapoel Be'er Sheva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Maccabi Haifa | Liga | Hapoel Be'er Sheva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.86 | 2.90 | • 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 86% | 55% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 61% | ▼ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 27% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 65% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Maccabi Haifa 1 - 1 - 2 Hapoel Be'er Sheva. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
When do Maccabi Haifa and Hapoel Be'er Sheva play?
Maccabi Haifa face Hapoel Be'er Sheva on 26 October 2026 in Israeli Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Maccabi Haifa and Hapoel Be'er Sheva?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Maccabi Haifa won 1, Hapoel Be'er Sheva won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Haifa vs Hapoel Be'er Sheva?
Maccabi Haifa score 2.57 goals per game on average and Hapoel Be'er Sheva 1.71. The Israeli Premier League average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 86% of Maccabi Haifa's matches and 57% of Hapoel Be'er Sheva's.
What form are Maccabi Haifa and Hapoel Be'er Sheva in?
Over the last 5 games Maccabi Haifa have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Hapoel Be'er Sheva 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Haifa vs Hapoel Be'er Sheva?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Maccabi Haifa vs Hapoel Be'er Sheva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.