Maccabi Netanya vs Beitar Jerusalem: match statistics
Beitar Jerusalem presents significantly better seasonal form with 73% of away matches won and an impressive goal difference (+15 goal difference away). Despite a weaker recent series of five matches, the guests occupy 2nd place in the table and are characterized by high efficiency (18% shot conversion) and possession dominance (62%). Maccabi Netanya, despite better recent form (1.6 PPG), has clearly weaker home statistics with only 36% victories and a high average of conceded goals (1.55 per match). Beitar has never finished an away match without scoring a goal (0% FTS), which constitutes an additional asset. The difference in quality between the two teams, confirmed by table position and full-season statistics, argues for a win for the guests, although the hosts' good recent form may make this a competitive encounter.
Maccabi Netanya vs Beitar Jerusalem: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Maccabi Netanya played Beitar Jerusalem in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 23 February 2026. Final score: 2:8.
Current form
Maccabi Netanya: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Beitar Jerusalem: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Maccabi Netanya scores 1.74 and concedes 1.96 goals per match. Beitar Jerusalem scores 2.09 and concedes 1.09. League average: 3.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Maccabi Netanya 70%, Beitar Jerusalem 70%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Netanya 70%, Beitar Jerusalem 65%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.83. Maccabi Netanya: 15.7 shots per match, Beitar Jerusalem: 15.7.
Match halves
Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00. Beitar Jerusalem: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.43.
Goals by minute
Maccabi Netanya: 76-90+ (13 goals). Beitar Jerusalem: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beitar Jerusalem presents significantly better seasonal form with 73% of away matches won and an impressive goal difference (+15 goal difference away). Despite a weaker recent series of five matches, the guests occupy 2nd place in the table and are characterized by high efficiency (18% shot conversion) and possession dominance (62%). Maccabi Netanya, despite better recent form (1.6 PPG), has clearly weaker home statistics with only 36% victories and a high average of conceded goals (1.55 per match). Beitar has never finished an away match without scoring a goal (0% FTS), which constitutes an additional asset. The difference in quality between the two teams, confirmed by table position and full-season statistics, argues for a win for the guests, although the hosts' good recent form may make this a competitive encounter.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Maccabi Netanya | Beitar Jerusalem | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maccabi Netanya is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.2 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beitar Jerusalem is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.74 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 2.09 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Beitar Jerusalem is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.96 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.09 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Maccabi Netanya scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Beitar Jerusalem keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).
Beitar Jerusalem scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maccabi Netanya
Over / Under - Beitar Jerusalem
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beitar Jerusalem is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.43 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maccabi Netanya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Beitar Jerusalem - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Maccabi Netanya
Beitar Jerusalem
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Maccabi Netanya | Liga | Beitar Jerusalem | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.70 | 3.05 | ▲ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 59% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 59% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 25% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 66% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 80% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Maccabi Netanya 0 - 0 - 1 Beitar Jerusalem. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Maccabi Netanya vs Beitar Jerusalem?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Maccabi Netanya 2:8 Beitar Jerusalem. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Netanya vs Beitar Jerusalem?
Maccabi Netanya score 1.74 goals per game on average and Beitar Jerusalem 2.09. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Maccabi Netanya's matches and 70% of Beitar Jerusalem's.
What form are Maccabi Netanya and Beitar Jerusalem in?
Over the last 5 games Maccabi Netanya have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Beitar Jerusalem 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Netanya vs Beitar Jerusalem?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Maccabi Netanya vs Beitar Jerusalem: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.