Israel - Israeli Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Katamon: match statistics

155%(1.53)
X25%(3.92)
220%(4.75)

Maccabi Netanya presents a clear advantage as the host of this match. The home team has a positive goal difference at home (+1) and a higher average of goals scored (1.88 vs 1.11), as well as significantly better xG figures (1.92 vs 1.18), indicating higher quality of created chances. Hapoel Katamon is in poor form with just one win in the last five matches and a negative away record (-3). The hosts also possess an advantage in possession (52% vs 39%) and take significantly more shots (16.25 vs 9.44), evidencing their offensive dominance. Although Maccabi Netanya is also going through a weaker period, home advantage and clearly superior offensive statistics should tip the scales of victory in their favor.

Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Katamon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Maccabi Netanya played Hapoel Katamon in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 9 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Maccabi Netanya: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Hapoel Katamon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Maccabi Netanya scores 1.71 and concedes 2.24 goals per match. Hapoel Katamon scores 0.88 and concedes 1.65. League average: 3.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Maccabi Netanya 71%, Hapoel Katamon 65%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Netanya 76%, Hapoel Katamon 59%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.28. Maccabi Netanya: 15.9 shots per match, Hapoel Katamon: 10.2.

Match halves

Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 1.18. Hapoel Katamon: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Maccabi Netanya: 76-90+ (11 goals). Hapoel Katamon: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Israeli Premier League: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Maccabi Netanya presents a clear advantage as the host of this match. The home team has a positive goal difference at home (+1) and a higher average of goals scored (1.88 vs 1.11), as well as significantly better xG figures (1.92 vs 1.18), indicating higher quality of created chances. Hapoel Katamon is in poor form with just one win in the last five matches and a negative away record (-3). The hosts also possess an advantage in possession (52% vs 39%) and take significantly more shots (16.25 vs 9.44), evidencing their offensive dominance. Although Maccabi Netanya is also going through a weaker period, home advantage and clearly superior offensive statistics should tip the scales of victory in their favor.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
22Shots16
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
8Shots on target6
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
2.54xG1.96
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
7Corners5
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
82Dangerous attacks74
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
14Fouls19
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
4Cards3
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
1.71Goals scored / match0.88
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
2.24Goals conceded / match1.65
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
50%Average possession43%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
6.35Shots on target / match3.29
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.94Shots per match10.24
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
6.35Shots on target3.29
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
10.7%Shot conversion8.6%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
50%Possession43%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
1.87xG for1.28
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
1.78xG against1.94
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

Shooting quality

Maccabi Netanya: AttackingHapoel Katamon: Balanced
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
Accuracy (shots on target)40%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Maccabi Netanya
WLDLL
Season result split
41% W12% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-8
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 2.27Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Hapoel Katamon
DWLLL
Season result split
12% W29% D59% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-10
0.65 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 2.21BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Maccabi Netanya is 94% better for: goals scored per match.

1.71 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 0.88 goals / match - Hapoel Katamon

Hapoel Katamon is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.24 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.65 goals / match - Hapoel Katamon

Maccabi Netanya scoring profile: very strong

Maccabi Netanya scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Hapoel Katamon keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

Hapoel Katamon scoring profile: very strong

Hapoel Katamon scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

29Goals scored (season)15
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
38Goals conceded (season)28
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
3.94Average goals in match2.53
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
12Goals conceded (last 5)9
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal71%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
59%2 goals18%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
18%3 goals0%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
12%4 goals0%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal76%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
71%2 goals53%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
35%3 goals18%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
24%4 goals12%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
18%Scored in both halves6%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
40%BTTS - last 560%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

94%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
76%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hapoel Katamon is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.18 pts / match - Hapoel Katamon

Maccabi Netanya - half-time state
24% leading12% draw65% trailing
Hapoel Katamon - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per match (1st half)1.18
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
1.59Average goals (1st half)0.94
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
24%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
65%No goal before half-time59%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)0.65
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)1.12
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
2.35Average goals (2nd half)1.59
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
18%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon
41%No goal after half-time65%
Maccabi NetanyaHapoel Katamon

Maccabi Netanya - second-half results

24% W35% D41% L
14
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hapoel Katamon - second-half results

6% W47% D47% L
20
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Maccabi Netanya - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Hapoel Katamon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Maccabi Netanya
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
4
4
16-30
2
8
31-45
4
7
46-60
5
7
61-75
11
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Hapoel Katamon
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
6
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Maccabi Netanya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Hapoel Katamon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).

Teams vs league

Maccabi NetanyaLigaHapoel Katamon
Average goals in match 3.943.16 2.53
Both teams scored 71%59% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%61% 59%
Clean sheets 6%24% 24%
Goal before half-time 94%68% 59%
Goal after half-time 94%81% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / match
1.53
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Maccabi NetanyaYellow cardRotem Moshe Keller
  2. Hapoel KatamonYellow cardOfek Nadir
  3. Maccabi NetanyaYellow cardDaniel Atlan
  4. Maccabi NetanyaYellow cardHeriberto Moreno Borges Tavares
  5. Hapoel KatamonYellow cardAweka Ashata
  6. Hapoel KatamonYellow cardHarel Shalom
  7. Maccabi NetanyaSubstitutionOn: Liam CohenOff: Daniel Atlan
  8. Hapoel KatamonSubstitutionOn: Guy BadashOff: Ohad Almagor
  9. Maccabi NetanyaSubstitutionOn: Junior Gontie DiomandeOff: Maxim Plakuschenko
  10. Hapoel KatamonSubstitutionOn: Nadim VrasanaOff: Andrew Idoko
  11. Maccabi NetanyaGoalWilson HarrisAssist: Maor Levi
  12. Maccabi NetanyaYellow cardWilson Harris
  13. Hapoel KatamonGoalGuy Badash

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Aviad Yahav-Hay ShiloachMatches officiated: 17
3.94Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins12%Draws41%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Maccabi Netanya 1 - 0 - 0 Hapoel Katamon. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Hapoel Katamon Jerusalem FC
1 : 2
Maccabi Netanya FC

FAQ

What was the result of Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Katamon?

The Israeli Premier League match finished Maccabi Netanya 1:1 Hapoel Katamon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Katamon?

Maccabi Netanya score 1.71 goals per game on average and Hapoel Katamon 0.88. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Maccabi Netanya's matches and 65% of Hapoel Katamon's.

What form are Maccabi Netanya and Hapoel Katamon in?

Over the last 5 games Maccabi Netanya have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Hapoel Katamon 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Katamon?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Katamon: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.