Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Petah Tikva: match statistics
Maccabi Netanya displays solid home form with a 43% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3) on their own turf. The hosts average 2.14 goals scored per home match; combined with an aggregate match average of 3.86 goals, this points to an offensive style of play. Despite Hapoel Petah Tikva's strong recent run (3 wins in the last 5 matches), they struggle on the road, holding just a 14% away win rate and a high draw percentage (57%). The visitors concede an average of 2.14 goals in away fixtures, which could be the deciding factor given the hosts' attacking potential. Taking into account Maccabi Netanya's home advantage and Hapoel Petah Tikva's poor away stats, I am backing a home win, although the visitors' tendency to draw suggests that a stalemate is also a plausible outcome.
Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Petah Tikva: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Maccabi Netanya played Hapoel Petah Tikva in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 31 December 2025. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Maccabi Netanya: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Hapoel Petah Tikva: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Maccabi Netanya scores 1.93 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. Hapoel Petah Tikva scores 1.53 and concedes 1.73. League average: 3.15 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Maccabi Netanya 80%, Hapoel Petah Tikva 60%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Netanya 80%, Hapoel Petah Tikva 60%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.54. Maccabi Netanya: 16.0 shots per match, Hapoel Petah Tikva: 12.9.
Match halves
Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.33. Hapoel Petah Tikva: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Maccabi Netanya: 76-90+ (11 goals). Hapoel Petah Tikva: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.15 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maccabi Netanya displays solid home form with a 43% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3) on their own turf. The hosts average 2.14 goals scored per home match; combined with an aggregate match average of 3.86 goals, this points to an offensive style of play. Despite Hapoel Petah Tikva's strong recent run (3 wins in the last 5 matches), they struggle on the road, holding just a 14% away win rate and a high draw percentage (57%). The visitors concede an average of 2.14 goals in away fixtures, which could be the deciding factor given the hosts' attacking potential. Taking into account Maccabi Netanya's home advantage and Hapoel Petah Tikva's poor away stats, I am backing a home win, although the visitors' tendency to draw suggests that a stalemate is also a plausible outcome.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Maccabi Netanya | Hapoel Petah Tikva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.2 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Netanya is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
1.93 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.53 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.13 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.73 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Maccabi Netanya scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Hapoel Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
Hapoel Petah Tikva scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maccabi Netanya
Over / Under - Hapoel Petah Tikva
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hapoel Petah Tikva is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.6 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maccabi Netanya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hapoel Petah Tikva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Maccabi Netanya
Hapoel Petah Tikva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Maccabi Netanya | Liga | Hapoel Petah Tikva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.07 | 3.15 | ▲ 3.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 61% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 61% | • 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 24% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 66% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 81% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Maccabi Netanya 0 - 0 - 1 Hapoel Petah Tikva. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Petah Tikva?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Maccabi Netanya 0:2 Hapoel Petah Tikva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Petah Tikva?
Maccabi Netanya score 1.93 goals per game on average and Hapoel Petah Tikva 1.53. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Maccabi Netanya's matches and 60% of Hapoel Petah Tikva's.
What form are Maccabi Netanya and Hapoel Petah Tikva in?
Over the last 5 games Maccabi Netanya have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Hapoel Petah Tikva 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Petah Tikva?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Maccabi Netanya vs Hapoel Petah Tikva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.