Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona: match statistics
Maccabi Netanya displays solid home form with a 40% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+4) at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per match in home games, which, with an xG of 1.97, confirms their offensive efficiency. Ironi Kiryat Shmona has poor away results, with just a 20% win rate and a negative goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.2 goals per away match. The recent form of both teams is unstable, but the home advantage and xG statistics (1.97 for the hosts vs 1.48 for the visitors) speak in favor of Maccabi Netanya. The high percentage of matches with goals from both sides (90% for both hosts and visitors) suggests an offensive spectacle, but Maccabi's greater experience and efficiency at their home ground give them the edge to secure three points.
Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Maccabi Netanya played Ironi Kiryat Shmona in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Maccabi Netanya: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Maccabi Netanya scores 1.67 and concedes 2.10 goals per match. Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores 1.43 and concedes 1.86. League average: 3.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Maccabi Netanya 71%, Ironi Kiryat Shmona 81%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Netanya 71%, Ironi Kiryat Shmona 76%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Maccabi Netanya has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.61. Maccabi Netanya: 15.4 shots per match, Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 13.6.
Match halves
Maccabi Netanya: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.10. Ironi Kiryat Shmona: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Maccabi Netanya: 76-90+ (13 goals). Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maccabi Netanya displays solid home form with a 40% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+4) at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per match in home games, which, with an xG of 1.97, confirms their offensive efficiency. Ironi Kiryat Shmona has poor away results, with just a 20% win rate and a negative goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.2 goals per away match. The recent form of both teams is unstable, but the home advantage and xG statistics (1.97 for the hosts vs 1.48 for the visitors) speak in favor of Maccabi Netanya. The high percentage of matches with goals from both sides (90% for both hosts and visitors) suggests an offensive spectacle, but Maccabi's greater experience and efficiency at their home ground give them the edge to secure three points.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Maccabi Netanya | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ironi Kiryat Shmona is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.2 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maccabi Netanya is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.43 goals / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Ironi Kiryat Shmona is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.1 goals / match - Maccabi Netanya · 1.86 goals / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Maccabi Netanya scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Ironi Kiryat Shmona keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).
Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Maccabi Netanya keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maccabi Netanya
Over / Under - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Netanya is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Maccabi Netanya · 0.95 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maccabi Netanya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ironi Kiryat Shmona - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Maccabi Netanya
Ironi Kiryat Shmona
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Maccabi Netanya | Liga | Ironi Kiryat Shmona | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.76 | 3.11 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 60% | ▲ 81% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 59% | ▲ 76% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 24% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 66% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 81% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Maccabi Netanya 1 - 0 - 0 Ironi Kiryat Shmona. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Maccabi Netanya 1:1 Ironi Kiryat Shmona. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?
Maccabi Netanya score 1.67 goals per game on average and Ironi Kiryat Shmona 1.43. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Maccabi Netanya's matches and 81% of Ironi Kiryat Shmona's.
What form are Maccabi Netanya and Ironi Kiryat Shmona in?
Over the last 5 games Maccabi Netanya have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Ironi Kiryat Shmona 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Netanya vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.