Israel - Israeli Premier LeagueHaMoshava StadiumData current as of 18 October 2026

Maccabi Petah Tikva vs Ironi Tiberias: match statistics

Maccabi Petah Tikva vs Ironi Tiberias: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Maccabi Petah Tikva played Ironi Tiberias in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: HaMoshava Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Maccabi Petah Tikva: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Ironi Tiberias: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Maccabi Petah Tikva scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Ironi Tiberias scores 0.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Maccabi Petah Tikva 100%, Ironi Tiberias 0%. Over 2.5: Maccabi Petah Tikva 100%, Ironi Tiberias 0%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Maccabi Petah Tikva has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.24. Maccabi Petah Tikva: 11.5 shots per match, Ironi Tiberias: 10.5.

Match halves

Maccabi Petah Tikva: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Ironi Tiberias: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Maccabi Petah Tikva: 0-15 (1 goals). Ironi Tiberias: 61-75 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Israeli Premier League: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Maccabi Petah Tikva have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals during that period, while Ironi Tiberias have suffered 4 defeats, conceding as many as 10 goals. The hosts have won 100% of their matches at home so far, averaging 2 goals per game and failing to score on none of those occasions. The visitors have lost every away match, have not scored a single goal and concede an average of 2 goals per game. Maccabi create fewer chances than their opponents, registering 11 shots compared to 14, but are significantly more efficient: they convert 18% of their attempts, while Ironi’s conversion rate stands at 0%. The visitors’ higher away xG of 1.39 compared to the hosts’ 1.22 suggests they could score a consolation goal, but their poor finishing and vulnerable defence strongly favour a Maccabi victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - No comes from Ironi Tiberias’ poor finishing: the team averages 0.6 goals over its last 5 matches and failed to score in 100% of available season fixtures. The visitors do have an average xG of 1.27 across their last five appearances, but this has translated into just 3 goals, while their BTTS rate during this period is only 20%. Maccabi Petah Tikva are in significantly better form, scoring 9 goals in their last 5 matches and averaging 1.8 goals per game, while Tiberias concede 2.0 goals per match. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches so far this season, and have conceded just 0.8 goals per game across their last five. Although the league-wide BTTS average stands at 57%, the more likely scenario appears to be a home win with the visitors failing to score rather than both teams finding the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Maccabi Petah Tikva have averaged 1.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Ironi Tiberias have conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game over the same period. The hosts have won 4 of their last 5 fixtures, scoring 9 goals in total, which stands in clear contrast to the visitors’ record of 3 goals scored and 10 conceded. The attacking potential of both sides is also supported by their xG figures: 1.47 for Maccabi and 1.27 for Ironi, alongside high xG allowed by their respective defenses—1.74 and 1.80. The Over 1.5 goals line has the edge, as it combines the hosts’ strong attacking form with the visitors’ defensive weaknesses, while the projected total of 2.78 goals provides a solid margin above the required two goals. Caution is warranted with higher lines, as both teams have recorded 100% of matches below 2.5 goals in the available season data; therefore, Over 2.5 remains only slightly likely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Maccabi Petah Tikva are in clearly better form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals and conceding just 0.8, while Ironi Tiberias have lost 4 of their last 5 games and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. The first half should nevertheless be cautious, as the hosts were level at the break in 80% of their last five appearances, compared with 60% for the visitors; Maccabi averaged 0.6 goals before half-time, while Ironi managed just 0.2. After the interval, the hosts' advantage increases: they score an average of 1.2 goals in the second half, compared with 0.4 for the visitors, who also concede 1.2 goals per game after the break. In addition, at least one goal was scored after half-time in all 5 of both teams' most recent matches, and Maccabi won the second half in 60% of those games. The most logical HT/FT outcome is therefore a draw at half-time followed by a Maccabi Petah Tikva win: X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
32Shots12
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
10Shots on target3
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0xG0
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
11Corners2
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0Dangerous attacks0
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
5Fouls6
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
1Cards3
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
2Goals scored / match0.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
1Goals conceded / match1
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
40%Average possession39%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
4.5Shots on target / match3.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match10.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
4.5Shots on target3.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
17.4%Shot conversion4.8%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
40%Possession39%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
1.37xG for1.24
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
1.54xG against1.69
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

Shooting quality

Maccabi Petah Tikva: Counter-attackingIroni Tiberias: Balanced
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.14

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Maccabi Petah Tikva is 100% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Maccabi Petah Tikva · 1.5 pts / match - Ironi Tiberias

Maccabi Petah Tikva
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Ironi Tiberias
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Maccabi Petah Tikva is 300% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Maccabi Petah Tikva · 0.5 goals / match - Ironi Tiberias

Maccabi Petah Tikva scoring profile: very strong

Maccabi Petah Tikva scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Ironi Tiberias keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Ironi Tiberias scoring profile: very strong

Ironi Tiberias scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Maccabi Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)1
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
2Goals conceded (season)2
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
3Average goals in match1.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
4Goals scored (last 5)1
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
100%2 goals0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%3 goals0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%4 goals0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%2 goals50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%3 goals0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%4 goals0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

100%
Maccabi Petah Tikva - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.2 of 2 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
50%Scored in both halves0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
100%BTTS - last 50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Maccabi Petah Tikva is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Maccabi Petah Tikva · 0.5 pts / match - Ironi Tiberias

Maccabi Petah Tikva - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Ironi Tiberias - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)0.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
1.5Goals scored (1st half)0
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
2Average goals (1st half)0.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0%No goal before half-time100%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias
50%No goal after half-time50%
Maccabi Petah TikvaIroni Tiberias

Maccabi Petah Tikva - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ironi Tiberias - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Maccabi Petah Tikva - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.50
Goals scored / match1.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ironi Tiberias - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.50
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match0.51.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Maccabi Petah Tikva
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Ironi Tiberias
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Maccabi Petah Tikva

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ironi Tiberias

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.74
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
39%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).

Teams vs league

Maccabi Petah TikvaLigaIroni Tiberias
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.79▼ 1.50
Both teams scored▲ 100%57%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%64%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%29%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%64%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%79%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ironi TiberiasRed cardBar Cohen
  2. Ironi TiberiasSubstitutionOn: Ariel CohenOff: Nu00e9nu00e9 Bi Junior Gbamblu00e9
  3. Maccabi Petah TikvaSubstitutionOn: Eyal EinbromOff: Pavlos Korrea
  4. Ironi TiberiasYellow cardChris Kouakou
  5. Maccabi Petah TikvaGoalJosé Ricardo Cortés
  6. Maccabi Petah TikvaSubstitutionOn: Marko RakonjacOff: Yoav Koren
  7. Maccabi Petah TikvaYellow cardSamuel Kwame Owusu
  8. Ironi TiberiasGoalAriel CohenAssist: Chris Kouakou
  9. Maccabi Petah TikvaSubstitutionOn: Ariel LugasiOff: Ibrahima Therna Soumah
  10. Maccabi Petah TikvaSubstitutionOn: Kyle SpenceOff: Or Dadya
  11. Ironi TiberiasSubstitutionOn: Nehoray ChenOff: Chris Kouakou

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Maccabi Petah Tikva vs Ironi Tiberias?

The Israeli Premier League match finished Maccabi Petah Tikva 1:2 Ironi Tiberias. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Maccabi Petah Tikva vs Ironi Tiberias?

Maccabi Petah Tikva score 2.00 goals per game on average and Ironi Tiberias 0.50. The Israeli Premier League average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Maccabi Petah Tikva's matches and 0% of Ironi Tiberias's.

What form are Maccabi Petah Tikva and Ironi Tiberias in?

Over the last 5 games Maccabi Petah Tikva have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Ironi Tiberias 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maccabi Petah Tikva vs Ironi Tiberias?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Maccabi Petah Tikva vs Ironi Tiberias: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.