Machida Zelvia vs Avispa Fukuoka: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Machida Zelvia vs Avispa Fukuoka: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Machida Zelvia play Avispa Fukuoka in J1 League (Japan). The match date is 18 October 2026. Venue: Machida Athletic Stadium.
Current form
Machida Zelvia: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Avispa Fukuoka: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Machida Zelvia scores 2.44 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Avispa Fukuoka scores 1.22 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Machida Zelvia 78%, Avispa Fukuoka 56%. Over 2.5: Machida Zelvia 67%, Avispa Fukuoka 56%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Machida Zelvia has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.41. Machida Zelvia: 13.1 shots per match, Avispa Fukuoka: 12.6.
Match halves
Machida Zelvia: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.56. Avispa Fukuoka: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Machida Zelvia: 76-90+ (7 goals). Avispa Fukuoka: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J1 League: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Machida Zelvia | Avispa Fukuoka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Machida Zelvia is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Machida Zelvia · 0.8 pts / match - Avispa Fukuoka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Machida Zelvia is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
2.44 goals / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.22 goals / match - Avispa Fukuoka
Machida Zelvia is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.44 goals / match - Avispa Fukuoka
Machida Zelvia scores in 100% of matches (9 of 9 matches), while Avispa Fukuoka keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
Avispa Fukuoka scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Machida Zelvia keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Machida Zelvia
Over / Under - Avispa Fukuoka
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Machida Zelvia is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.78 pts / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.44 pts / match - Avispa Fukuoka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Machida Zelvia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Avispa Fukuoka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Machida Zelvia
Avispa Fukuoka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Machida Zelvia | Liga | Avispa Fukuoka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.56 | 2.91 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 23% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 68% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 89% | 88% | • 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Machida Zelvia 0 - 2 - 0 Avispa Fukuoka. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Machida Zelvia and Avispa Fukuoka play?
Machida Zelvia face Avispa Fukuoka on 18 October 2026 in J1 League at Machida Athletic Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Machida Zelvia and Avispa Fukuoka?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Machida Zelvia won 0, Avispa Fukuoka won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Machida Zelvia vs Avispa Fukuoka?
Machida Zelvia score 2.44 goals per game on average and Avispa Fukuoka 1.22. The J1 League average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Machida Zelvia's matches and 56% of Avispa Fukuoka's.
What form are Machida Zelvia and Avispa Fukuoka in?
Over the last 5 games Machida Zelvia have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Avispa Fukuoka 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Machida Zelvia vs Avispa Fukuoka?
The statistical background for Machida Zelvia vs Avispa Fukuoka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.