Machida Zelvia vs Yokohama F. Marinos: match statistics
Machida Zelvia vs Yokohama F. Marinos: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Machida Zelvia played Yokohama F. Marinos in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Grenada National Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Machida Zelvia: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Yokohama F. Marinos: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Machida Zelvia scores 3.00 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Yokohama F. Marinos scores 1.67 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.97 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Machida Zelvia 83%, Yokohama F. Marinos 50%. Over 2.5: Machida Zelvia 83%, Yokohama F. Marinos 33%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Machida Zelvia has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.30. Machida Zelvia: 15.2 shots per match, Yokohama F. Marinos: 11.7.
Match halves
Machida Zelvia: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.83. Yokohama F. Marinos: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Machida Zelvia: 31-45+ (4 goals). Yokohama F. Marinos: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J1 League: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Machida Zelvia remain unbeaten after 6 rounds, with a record of 5 wins and 1 draw. In their last five matches, they have collected 13 points and scored 12 goals. At home, the hosts have won every game, averaging 2.5 goals, 6 shots on target and a 19% finishing rate, compared with Yokohama’s 1.67 goals and 15% finishing rate away from home. Machida’s superiority is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average home xG stands at 1.57, while the visitors generate 1.38 xG away from home and allow opponents 1.60 xG. However, Yokohama F. Marinos have kept clean sheets in 67% of their away matches and concede only 1 goal on average in those games, so they may keep the scoreline close to a draw. Nevertheless, the hosts’ stronger current run, with four wins in their last five matches, combined with their perfect home record, points to a Machida victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is primarily driven by their attacking consistency: Machida and Yokohama each average 1.67 goals per match this season, and neither team has yet finished a game without scoring. The hosts concede an average of 1.67 goals, which clearly supports Yokohama’s chances, as their average xG stands at 1.38 and they register 4.33 shots on target per match compared with Machida’s 2.33. Machida have recorded BTTS in 67% of their league matches and in as many as 80% of their last five games, in which they averaged 2.4 goals. The main risk to the pick is the visitors’ defence, which has kept a clean sheet in 67% of matches, as well as the fact that Yokohama have BTTS in only 33% of their league games. Nevertheless, the high xG conceded by both teams—1.47 for Machida and 1.60 for Yokohama—slightly tilts the forecast towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Machida have averaged 2.4 goals scored and created chances worth 1.56 xG across their last five matches, while Yokohama conceded just 0.8 goals per game over the same period. However, the visitors have been consistent in attack, averaging 1.4 goals in their last five outings, with an average xG of 1.32. Both teams exceeded the 1.5-goal line in 67% of their matches this season, while the league average stands at a high 3.0 goals per game. Machida’s recent form has been clearly more offensive, with at least 3 goals scored in 80% of their last five matches, although caution is warranted given that Yokohama recorded this outcome in only 20% of such games. Therefore, the safest choice is Over 1.5 goals: the projected total of 2.65 goals provides a strong margin even in a more cautious match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Machida Zelvia has a clear advantage in match openings: they were leading at the break in 67% of their games, scoring an average of 1.00 goals and conceding just 0.33. Yokohama F. Marinos were level at half-time in 67% of their appearances, while their average first-half output stands at 0.67 goals, which supports the prospect of a narrow home lead at the break. In their last five matches, Machida won four times, averaging 2.4 goals scored and just 0.8 conceded. The second half is also crucial: the hosts have averaged 1.6 goals after the break in this sequence and won the second half in 80% of those matches, whereas Marinos have scored only 0.6 goals during that period. Although the visitors average more shots on target—4.33 compared with 2.33—Machida’s superior current form and their advantage in the closing stages point towards a HT/FT outcome of 1/1: the hosts to lead at half-time and win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Machida Zelvia | Yokohama F. Marinos | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.55 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Machida Zelvia is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Machida Zelvia · 2 pts / match - Yokohama F. Marinos
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Machida Zelvia is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
3 goals / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.67 goals / match - Yokohama F. Marinos
Machida Zelvia is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Machida Zelvia · 1.33 goals / match - Yokohama F. Marinos
Machida Zelvia scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Yokohama F. Marinos keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
Yokohama F. Marinos scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Machida Zelvia keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Machida Zelvia
Over / Under - Yokohama F. Marinos
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Machida Zelvia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Yokohama F. Marinos - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Machida Zelvia
Yokohama F. Marinos
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Machida Zelvia | Liga | Yokohama F. Marinos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.83 | 2.97 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 59% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 56% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 23% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Machida Zelvia 0 - 1 - 1 Yokohama F. Marinos. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Machida Zelvia vs Yokohama F. Marinos?
The J1 League match finished Machida Zelvia 1:1 Yokohama F. Marinos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Machida Zelvia and Yokohama F. Marinos?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Machida Zelvia won 0, Yokohama F. Marinos won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Machida Zelvia vs Yokohama F. Marinos?
Machida Zelvia score 3.00 goals per game on average and Yokohama F. Marinos 1.67. The J1 League average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Machida Zelvia's matches and 50% of Yokohama F. Marinos's.
What form are Machida Zelvia and Yokohama F. Marinos in?
Over the last 5 games Machida Zelvia have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Yokohama F. Marinos 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Machida Zelvia vs Yokohama F. Marinos?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Machida Zelvia vs Yokohama F. Marinos: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


