Indonesia - Liga 1Gelora Madura Ratu Pamelingan StadiumData current as of 18 September 2026

Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Madura United played PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 18 September 2026. Venue: Gelora Madura Ratu Pamelingan Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Madura United: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Madura United scores 2.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 0.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.90 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Madura United 50%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. Over 2.5: Madura United 50%, PSIM Yogyakarta 0%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.39. Madura United: 11.0 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 12.5.

Match halves

Madura United: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 2.00. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Madura United: 46-60 (2 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 76-90+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Madura United have won both of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2 goals per game and conceding none, while PSIM Yogyakarta lost their only away match 0:1. The hosts are creating significantly better chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.81 compared with 1.34 for the visitors, who allow opponents as much as 2.51 xG away from home. Madura tend to control games more effectively, averaging 58% possession and 16 shots per match, compared with PSIM’s 45% and 12 shots. The Yogyakarta-based side have failed to score in 100% of their away matches so far, while Madura have kept a clean sheet in every home fixture, strongly supporting a home win. Both teams have conceded 6 goals across their last five matches, but home advantage and Madura’s significantly more solid defence point towards a controlled victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal is driven primarily by current form: in their last 5 matches, both Madura United and PSIM Yogyakarta recorded BTTS in 60% of games. During this period, Madura averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while PSIM scored 1.2 and also conceded 1.2 goals per match. The hosts have an average xG of 1.60, while PSIM allow opponents as much as 2.51 xG, which significantly increases the chance of a Madura goal. The visitors have failed to score in the available season data and have 100% of matches without a goal scored, but their latest xG stands at 1.85, compared with Madura's 1.72 xG conceded recently, so a breakthrough is realistic. The league-wide BTTS rate of 61% further supports a scenario in which both teams find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The 2.70-goal projection is based on the strong matchup between Madura United’s attack, which has a seasonal xG of 1.60, and PSIM Yogyakarta’s defense, which allows as much as 2.51 xG per match. At the same time, the visitors should not remain completely passive, as they have averaged 1.85 xG over their last 5 matches, while Madura United has allowed 1.72 xG during this period. Both teams have conceded 6 goals in their last 5 matches, while results featuring Over 2.5 goals occurred in 60% of Madura’s matches and 40% of PSIM’s games in this run, pointing more toward a 2-3-goal range than an open, high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 line has the edge, as seasonal data shows that 100% of matches involving both teams ended with a maximum of three goals, while the expected combined total remains clearly below four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Madura United have the stronger potential to secure the full-time victory: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.8 goals and won 60% of their games, compared with PSIM Yogyakarta’s 1.2 goals and 40% win rate. The strongest argument in favour of the home side is the second half, in which they have averaged 1.2 goals, won the half in 80% of these matches, and recorded 2.4 points per game, while the visitors managed only 0.6 goals and 0.8 points. PSIM also have a weak defensive profile based on xG conceded, allowing an average of 2.51 xG compared with Madura’s 0.95, which should increase the home side’s advantage as the match progresses. The scenario of Madura taking the lead at the break is supported by the fact that they were ahead after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five appearances, compared with 40% for their opponents. Although a draw at half-time remains a realistic possibility, the most likely single outcome is for the home side to lead at half-time and win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
20Shots13
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
9Shots on target5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2.47xG1.73
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
6Corners7
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
80Dangerous attacks77
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
-1Fouls-1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1Cards4
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2.5Goals scored / match0.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Goals conceded / match1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Average possession56%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
4Shots on target / match3
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match12.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
4Shots on target3
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
22.7%Shot conversion4%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Possession56%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.39xG for1.47
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.72xG against1.73
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Madura United: Efficient finishingPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)36%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.630.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Madura United is 500% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Madura United · 0.5 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
PSIM Yogyakarta
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Madura United is 400% better for: goals scored per match.

2.5 goals / match - Madura United · 0.5 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Madura United · 1 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United scoring profile: very strong

Madura United scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: mixed

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Madura United keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

5Goals scored (season)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1Goals conceded (season)2
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
3Average goals in match1.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
5Goals scored (last 5)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
100%2 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%3 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%2 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%3 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Scored in both halves0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%BTTS - last 550%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Madura United is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Madura United · 1 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Average goals (1st half)0
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%No goal before half-time100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%No goal after half-time50%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Madura United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match0.52.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match0.52.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.50
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.01.5
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Madura United
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Madura United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

Madura UnitedLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match 3.002.90 1.50
Both teams scored 50%65% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%50% 0%
Clean sheets 50%18% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%85% 0%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.90
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIM YogyakartaGoalNermin HaljetaAssist: Nolberto Ezequiel Vidal
  2. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardNolberto Ezequiel Vidal
  3. Madura UnitedYellow cardIlham Syah
  4. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardRio Hardiawan
  5. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardJosé Pedro Magalhães Valente
  6. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Mauro Andrés Caballero AguileraOff: Ondřej Rudzan
  7. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardMauro Andrés Caballero Aguilera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Madura United 0 - 0 - 2 PSIM Yogyakarta. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Madura United 2:1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Madura United and PSIM Yogyakarta?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Madura United won 0, PSIM Yogyakarta won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Madura United score 2.50 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 0.50. The Liga 1 average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Madura United's matches and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Madura United and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Madura United have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The statistical background for Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.