Maghreb Fès vs Yacoub El Mansour: match statistics
Maghreb Fès vs Yacoub El Mansour: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Maghreb Fès played Yacoub El Mansour in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Venue: Complexe Sportif de Fès. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Maghreb Fès: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Yacoub El Mansour: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Maghreb Fès scores 1.33 and concedes 0.59 goals per match. Yacoub El Mansour scores 1.11 and concedes 1.48. League average: 2.13 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Maghreb Fès 41%, Yacoub El Mansour 74%. Over 2.5: Maghreb Fès 30%, Yacoub El Mansour 56%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Yacoub El Mansour has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.21. Maghreb Fès: 9.0 shots per match, Yacoub El Mansour: 10.6.
Match halves
Maghreb Fès: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.81. Yacoub El Mansour: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Maghreb Fès: 76-90+ (9 goals). Yacoub El Mansour: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maghreb Fès are the clear favorites (2nd in the table) with a season record of 14 wins, 10 draws and 3 losses, indicating result stability. At home the hosts score an average of 1.54 goals and concede only 0.69 per match, whereas Yacoub El Mansour average 0.92 goals scored and 1.46 conceded on the road. Quality of chances also favors the hosts — home average xG for the hosts is 1.45 versus 1.19 xG for the visitors away, and the hosts’ goal conversion rate is 15% vs 10% for their opponents. Maghreb Fès register more shots on target (4.85 vs 3.23) and enjoy greater possession (60% vs 52%), while keeping 54% clean sheets at home compared to only 15% clean sheets for the visitors away, giving them a clear advantage in game control and defense. Although the visitors have better recent form (2.0 points per game in the last 5 matches vs 1.6 for the hosts), the aggregate seasonal metrics point to a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'Both Teams To Score' scenario is more likely as Maghreb Fès posts a season BTTS rate of 86% versus Yacoub El Mansour's 62%, while the league average BTTS is 50%. In the last 5 matches Maghreb records 60% BTTS and the visitors 80%, indicating an intensified short-term mutual scoring trend. xG data support goals from both sides: the home side generates 1.42 xG per game and the visitors 1.19 xG, with xG against at 1.14 (home) and 1.18 (away). Additionally, Maghreb averages 1.29 goals and 3.62 shots on target, whereas Yacoub averages 0.92 goals and 3.23 shots on target, and the visitors concede 1.46 goals per game. Low clean sheet rates—7% for the home team and 15% for the visitors—together with season goal balances (Maghreb 36 scored vs 16 conceded, Yacoub 30 scored vs 40 conceded) lead me to rate BTTS - Yes at 80%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I recommend Over 1.5 as the main bet because 93% of Maghreb Fès’s home matches and 77% of Yacoub El Mansour’s games finished over 1.5 goals (average 85%), giving a strong signal for at least two goals. The xG model indicates 1.30 xG for the home side and 1.17 xG for the away side, totaling 2.47 xG — close to 2.5 but well above 1.5. The hosts average 11.77 shots with 3.62 on target versus 9.08 and 3.23 for the visitors, and the “both teams to score” stat is 86% for the home team and 62% for the away team, increasing the likelihood of goals at both ends. Season shares for Over 2.5 are 64% (home) and 46% (away), so the 2.5 line is less decisive (I estimate Over 2.5 at ~48%), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~16%), consistent with seasonal 21%/8% for Over 3.5. In summary, the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is Over 1.5 (estimated 80% vs 20%), while the 2.5 and 3.5 lines provide weaker signals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at the break and home win (X/1) as the strongest signal. The first half should be balanced: average first-half goals are 1.36 for the home side versus 1.31 for the visitors; the home team scores on average 0.57 goals by half-time against 0.38 for the away team, and combined with a half-time draw rate of 36% for the hosts and 54% for the visitors this increases the likelihood of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break the home side holds a statistical edge — season second-half goals average 1.43 for Maghreb Fès versus 1.08 for Yacoub El Mansour; the hosts score 0.71 goals after the break compared to 0.54 for the guests, and xG of 1.42 versus 1.19 indicates superior chance creation. Although the visitors are in better recent form (in the last 5 matches the away side have won 60% of games versus 40% for the hosts), seasonal metrics still favour the home team: season points per match 1.14 versus 0.77 and home win percentage 29% versus 15% for the away side, therefore I expect that after a Half-Time draw it will be Maghreb Fès who finds the decisive goal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Maghreb Fès | Yacoub El Mansour | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Yacoub El Mansour is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Maghreb Fès · 2 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maghreb Fès is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Maghreb Fès · 1.11 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Maghreb Fès is 151% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.59 goals / match - Maghreb Fès · 1.48 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Maghreb Fès scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Yacoub El Mansour keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 matches).
Yacoub El Mansour scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Maghreb Fès keeps a clean sheet in 52% (14 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maghreb Fès
Over / Under - Yacoub El Mansour
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maghreb Fès is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Maghreb Fès · 1 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maghreb Fès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Yacoub El Mansour - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Maghreb Fès
Yacoub El Mansour
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Maghreb Fès | Liga | Yacoub El Mansour | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.93 | 2.13 | ▲ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 50% | ▲ 74% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 38% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 31% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 61% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Maghreb Fès 1 - 0 - 0 Yacoub El Mansour. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Maghreb Fès vs Yacoub El Mansour?
The Botola Pro match finished Maghreb Fès 2:1 Yacoub El Mansour. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Maghreb Fès vs Yacoub El Mansour?
Maghreb Fès score 1.33 goals per game on average and Yacoub El Mansour 1.11. The Botola Pro average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Maghreb Fès's matches and 74% of Yacoub El Mansour's.
What form are Maghreb Fès and Yacoub El Mansour in?
Over the last 5 games Maghreb Fès have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Yacoub El Mansour 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maghreb Fès vs Yacoub El Mansour?
The statistical background for Maghreb Fès vs Yacoub El Mansour — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


