Mamelodi Sundowns vs Chippa United: match statistics
Mamelodi Sundowns vs Chippa United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mamelodi Sundowns played Chippa United in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Mamelodi Sundowns: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Chippa United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mamelodi Sundowns scores 1.76 and concedes 0.52 goals per match. Chippa United scores 0.77 and concedes 1.27. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mamelodi Sundowns 48%, Chippa United 41%. Over 2.5: Mamelodi Sundowns 33%, Chippa United 45%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 29%.
xG, shots and style
Mamelodi Sundowns has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.10. Mamelodi Sundowns: 13.9 shots per match, Chippa United: 8.9.
Match halves
Mamelodi Sundowns: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.00. Chippa United: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Mamelodi Sundowns: 61-75 (9 goals). Chippa United: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier Soccer League: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 29%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mamelodi Sundowns are clear favorites: at home they win 90% of matches and score an average of 2.4 goals per game, while Chippa United have only a 9% win rate away and average 0.64 goals. The hosts dominate possession (72% vs 49%), average 6.5 shots on target versus 2.27 for the visitors and have double the shot conversion rate (16% vs 8%), translating to xG 1.86 compared to Chippa’s 1.05. Defensively Sundowns concede only 0.6 goals per game at home and keep 40% clean sheets, whereas Chippa concedes 1.18 goals on the road and fail to score in 45% of away matches, highlighting a large disparity in chance quality. In the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 2.4 points (4 wins out of 5), while the visitors averaged 1.0 point (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses), therefore I predict a Mamelodi victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Mamelodi Sundowns at home have a seasonal BTTS 36% and keep a clean sheet in 45% of matches, indicating hosts often prevent opponents from scoring. Chippa United away have a seasonal BTTS 45% and average 0.64 goals scored per game while conceding 1.18 goals away and have conceded 28 goals in the season. In the last 5 matches Sundowns averaged 2.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded with average xG 1.64 (attack) vs 0.97 (defense); Chippa averaged 1.4 scored and 1.4 conceded with average xG 1.29 (attack) and 1.64 (defense). Sundowns produce more shots and shots on target (avg 9.82 shots and 3.36 on target vs 8.0 shots and 2.27 on target for Chippa) and have a higher conversion rate (9% vs 8%) and 37 home goals this season, supporting their match control. Considering Sundowns' 45% clean sheets, the hosts' lower seasonal BTTS (36%) and the advantage in form and recent output (2.0 vs 1.4 in last 5), a 'No' (No Goal/clean sheet expected) scenario is more likely: 65% for 'No' and 35% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate the home side will score about 1.49 goals (based on home xG 1.17 vs xG conceded 1.80), and the visitors about 1.29 goals (away xG 1.05 vs xG conceded 1.53), yielding a total expected goals of approximately 2.78. With lambda = 2.78 the Poisson distribution gives probability of Over 1.5 ≈ 77% (Under 1.5 ≈ 23%), Over 2.5 ≈ 53% (Under 47%) and Over 3.5 ≈ 30% (Under 70%), so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, this season Sundowns have 73% of matches >1.5 goals and Chippa 55%; in the last 5 matches the home team averaged 2.0 goals and the visitors 1.4 (total 3.4), which supports a higher-goal outlook. Shot and xG metrics confirm offensive pressure: Sundowns average 9.82 shots and 3.36 on target (xG 1.17), Chippa 8.0 shots and 2.27 on target (xG 1.05), and Chippa conceding 1.8 xG makes scoring easier. For these reasons I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the most probable and strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict HT/FT 1/1 as the most likely scenario. The hosts led at the break in 4 of 11 home matches (36%) and average 0.45 goals in the first half versus Chippa United’s 0.18, so they have an early-game advantage. In their last five matches Sundowns have won 4 of 5 (80%) and average 2.0 goals per game, while Chippa average 1.4; the hosts also have higher xG (1.17 vs 1.05) and more shots on target (3.36 vs 2.27), which increases the chance of maintaining a lead. Additionally, both teams scored before half-time in only 9% of cases, so the first half is generally not rich in goals from both sides, reducing the likelihood of 1/2 or X/2 scenarios. Therefore I rate 1/1 highest, with alternatives such as a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1) or a draw at half-time and full-time (X/X) being less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mamelodi Sundowns | Chippa United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mamelodi Sundowns is 200% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Mamelodi Sundowns · 1 pts / match - Chippa United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mamelodi Sundowns is 129% better for: goals scored per match.
1.76 goals / match - Mamelodi Sundowns · 0.77 goals / match - Chippa United
Mamelodi Sundowns is 144% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.52 goals / match - Mamelodi Sundowns · 1.27 goals / match - Chippa United
Mamelodi Sundowns scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Chippa United keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).
Chippa United scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Mamelodi Sundowns keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mamelodi Sundowns
Over / Under - Chippa United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mamelodi Sundowns is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.76 pts / match - Mamelodi Sundowns · 1.23 pts / match - Chippa United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mamelodi Sundowns - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chippa United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mamelodi Sundowns
Chippa United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).
Teams vs league
| Mamelodi Sundowns | Liga | Chippa United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.29 | 1.95 | • 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 37% | ▲ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▲ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 37% | • 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mamelodi Sundowns 0 - 1 - 0 Chippa United. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mamelodi Sundowns vs Chippa United?
The Premier Soccer League match finished Mamelodi Sundowns 4:1 Chippa United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mamelodi Sundowns vs Chippa United?
Mamelodi Sundowns score 1.76 goals per game on average and Chippa United 0.77. The Premier Soccer League average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Mamelodi Sundowns's matches and 41% of Chippa United's.
What form are Mamelodi Sundowns and Chippa United in?
Over the last 5 games Mamelodi Sundowns have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Chippa United 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mamelodi Sundowns vs Chippa United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


