Manchester United vs AFC Bournemouth: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Manchester United vs AFC Bournemouth: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Manchester United play AFC Bournemouth in Premier League (England). The match date is 25 October 2026. Venue: Old Trafford.
Current form
Manchester United: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. AFC Bournemouth: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Manchester United scores 1.43 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. AFC Bournemouth scores 1.29 and concedes 1.86. League average: 2.90 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Manchester United 71%, AFC Bournemouth 71%. Over 2.5: Manchester United 29%, AFC Bournemouth 57%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Manchester United has higher xG: 2.02 vs 1.65. Manchester United: 19.7 shots per match, AFC Bournemouth: 15.1.
Match halves
Manchester United: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14. AFC Bournemouth: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Manchester United: 61-75 (3 goals). AFC Bournemouth: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Manchester United | AFC Bournemouth | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AFC Bournemouth is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Manchester United · 1 pts / match - AFC Bournemouth
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Manchester United is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.43 goals / match - Manchester United · 1.29 goals / match - AFC Bournemouth
Manchester United is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Manchester United · 1.86 goals / match - AFC Bournemouth
Manchester United scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while AFC Bournemouth keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
AFC Bournemouth scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Manchester United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Manchester United
Over / Under - AFC Bournemouth
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AFC Bournemouth is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Manchester United · 2 pts / match - AFC Bournemouth
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Manchester United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
AFC Bournemouth - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Manchester United
AFC Bournemouth
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Manchester United | Liga | AFC Bournemouth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.86 | 2.90 | ▲ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 53% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 27% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 61% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Manchester United 0 - 2 - 0 AFC Bournemouth. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Manchester United and AFC Bournemouth play?
Manchester United face AFC Bournemouth on 25 October 2026 in Premier League at Old Trafford. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Manchester United and AFC Bournemouth?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Manchester United won 0, AFC Bournemouth won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Manchester United vs AFC Bournemouth?
Manchester United score 1.43 goals per game on average and AFC Bournemouth 1.29. The Premier League average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Manchester United's matches and 71% of AFC Bournemouth's.
What form are Manchester United and AFC Bournemouth in?
Over the last 5 games Manchester United have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and AFC Bournemouth 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Manchester United vs AFC Bournemouth?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.