England - Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics

Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Manchester United played Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Manchester United: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Nottingham Forest: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Manchester United scores 1.75 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Nottingham Forest scores 1.25 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Manchester United 72%, Nottingham Forest 44%. Over 2.5: Manchester United 61%, Nottingham Forest 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Manchester United has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.44. Manchester United: 15.4 shots per match, Nottingham Forest: 12.5.

Match halves

Manchester United: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.03. Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Manchester United: 76-90+ (15 goals). Nottingham Forest: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier League: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I tip 1 — Manchester United to win. The hosts have won 67% of their home matches and average 2.00 goals per home game, while Nottingham Forest as visitors average 1.44 goals and only 39% away wins. United create better chances: home xG is 1.95 versus Forest’s 1.22 xG on the road, and shots on target are 6.78 for United vs 4.22 for the visitors. Defensively Manchester concedes 1.22 goals at home on average, while Forest concedes 1.39 away; additionally Forest fail to score in 28% of away matches compared to 11% of United’s home games, which increases the hosts’ chances. Although Forest have scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus United’s 7 and both teams have 3 wins in their last 5 (averaging 2 points per game), Manchester’s superiority in chance creation and game control at Old Trafford gives them a higher probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have season BTTS rates of 44% each, while the league average BTTS is 55%; in the last 5 matches Man United recorded BTTS 60% versus Nottingham’s 40%, which slightly favors the "both teams to score" scenario. United generate xG 1.66 per match but actually score only 1.06 goals per match with a low conversion rate of 7%, indicating the hosts create chances (xG 1.66) but are often inefficient. Conversely Nottingham have xG_for 1.22 and xG_against 1.62, score 1.44 goals per match on average, and scored 10 goals in their last 5 fixtures (2.0 per match) with a conversion rate of 14%, so the visitors are capable of finishing. Clean sheets for both teams are uncommon (United 22%, Nottingham 28%) and the league averages 2.76 goals per match, which reduces the likelihood of No Goal outcomes. On this basis I assess BTTS at 60% (Yes) and 40% (No) as the best pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Season xG are 1.66 for Manchester and 1.22 for Nottingham, giving a combined xG of ~2.90, which points to almost 3 expected goals in the match. Manchester averages 15 shots (3.94 on target), Nottingham 10 shots (4.22 on target); with conversion rates of 7% for the home side versus 14% for the visitors, the away team is more efficient in turning chances into goals (seasonal goals per match 1.06 vs 1.44). Over statistics show Manchester with 72% of matches Over 1.5 goals, Nottingham 89%, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams have 60% of matches Over 2.5, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. A model based on the combined xG of 2.90 translates to estimates of approximately 79% for Over 1.5, ~55% for Over 2.5 and ~33% for Over 3.5. Given the high Over 1.5 rates (72% vs 89%), low clean sheet rates (22% and 28%) and combined xG ~2.9, I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with an away win at full-time (X/2). The home side drew at half-time in 61% of their matches and score on average 0.39 goals by the break, while the visitors average 0.61 goals before half-time and lead at the break in 28% of games. The visitors dominate after the break — they earn an average of 1.67 points in second halves and win second halves in 44% of cases, compared to 1.06 points and 22% second-half wins for the hosts. Additionally, the visitors have a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs. 7% for the hosts) and average 4.22 shots on target per match versus 3.94, and the hosts concede many late goals (the hosts conceded 10 goals in the 76–90' window, the visitors scored 7 in that period), which favors a turnaround after half-time. On this basis I assigned the highest probability to X/2 (26%), with the next most likely outcomes being X/X (20%) and 2/2 (20%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
29Shots11
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
8Shots on target4
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
2.79xG1.28
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
7Corners6
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
58Dangerous attacks42
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
11Fouls5
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
2Cards1
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
1.75Goals scored / match1.25
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
1.33Goals conceded / match1.31
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
52%Average possession47%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
5.58Shots on target / match4.08
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.44Shots per match12.5
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
5.58Shots on target4.08
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
11.3%Shot conversion10%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
52%Possession47%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
1.72xG for1.44
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
1.36xG against1.48
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

Shooting quality

Manchester United: AttackingNottingham Forest: Balanced
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nottingham Forest is 10% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Manchester United · 2.2 pts / match - Nottingham Forest

Manchester United
LWWWD
Season result split
50% W31% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
18-11-7
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-3-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Nottingham Forest
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W28% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-15
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-8
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Manchester United is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Manchester United · 1.25 goals / match - Nottingham Forest

Manchester United scoring profile: very strong

Manchester United scores in 89% of matches (32 of 36 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

Nottingham Forest scoring profile: strong

Nottingham Forest scores in 61% of matches (22 of 36 matches), while Manchester United keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 matches).

63Goals scored (season)45
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
48Goals conceded (season)47
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
3.08Average goals in match2.56
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
7Goals scored (last 5)14
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal61%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
56%2 goals33%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
22%3 goals22%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
8%4 goals6%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal75%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
42%2 goals39%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
8%3 goals17%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
3%4 goals0%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

72%
Manchester United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.26 of 36 matches
44%
Nottingham Forest - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 36 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time14%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
31%Scored in both halves19%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
60%BTTS - last 580%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Manchester United is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Manchester United · 0.97 pts / match - Nottingham Forest

Manchester United - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing
Nottingham Forest - half-time state
19% leading39% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)0.97
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.14
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
61%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
44%No goal before half-time67%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.36
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
1.03Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
1.92Average goals (2nd half)1.42
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
39%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest
36%No goal after half-time53%
Manchester UnitedNottingham Forest

Manchester United - second-half results

28% W44% D28% L
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nottingham Forest - second-half results

33% W36% D31% L
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Manchester United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Nottingham Forest - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Manchester United
ScoredConceded
7
5
0-15
7
5
16-30
12
6
31-45
11
10
46-60
11
8
61-75
15
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Nottingham Forest
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
2
6
16-30
8
12
31-45
9
7
46-60
6
3
61-75
12
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Manchester United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Nottingham Forest

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).

Teams vs league

Manchester UnitedLigaNottingham Forest
Average goals in match 3.082.76 2.56
Both teams scored 72%55% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%55% 53%
Clean sheets 19%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Manchester UnitedGoalLuke Paul Hoare Shaw
  2. Nottingham ForestGoalFelipe Rodrigues da SilvaAssist: Elliot Anderson
  3. Manchester UnitedGoalBryan MbeumoAssist: Bruno Miguel Borges Fernandes
  4. Nottingham ForestGoalMorgan Anthony Gibbs-WhiteAssist: Elliot Anderson
  5. Manchester UnitedYellow cardCarlos Henrique Casimiro
  6. Manchester UnitedSubstitutionOn: Mason Tony MountOff: Carlos Henrique Casimiro
  7. Manchester UnitedYellow cardLuke Paul Hoare Shaw
  8. Nottingham ForestYellow cardElliot Anderson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Michael SalisburyMatches officiated: 14
4.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins36%Draws14%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Manchester United 0 - 1 - 0 Nottingham Forest. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Nottingham Forest FC
2 : 2
Manchester United FC

FAQ

What was the result of Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?

The Premier League match finished Manchester United 3:2 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?

Manchester United score 1.75 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.25. The Premier League average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Manchester United's matches and 44% of Nottingham Forest's.

What form are Manchester United and Nottingham Forest in?

Over the last 5 games Manchester United have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.