Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics
Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Manchester United played Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Manchester United: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Nottingham Forest: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Manchester United scores 1.75 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Nottingham Forest scores 1.25 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Manchester United 72%, Nottingham Forest 44%. Over 2.5: Manchester United 61%, Nottingham Forest 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Manchester United has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.44. Manchester United: 15.4 shots per match, Nottingham Forest: 12.5.
Match halves
Manchester United: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.03. Nottingham Forest: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Manchester United: 76-90+ (15 goals). Nottingham Forest: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I tip 1 — Manchester United to win. The hosts have won 67% of their home matches and average 2.00 goals per home game, while Nottingham Forest as visitors average 1.44 goals and only 39% away wins. United create better chances: home xG is 1.95 versus Forest’s 1.22 xG on the road, and shots on target are 6.78 for United vs 4.22 for the visitors. Defensively Manchester concedes 1.22 goals at home on average, while Forest concedes 1.39 away; additionally Forest fail to score in 28% of away matches compared to 11% of United’s home games, which increases the hosts’ chances. Although Forest have scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus United’s 7 and both teams have 3 wins in their last 5 (averaging 2 points per game), Manchester’s superiority in chance creation and game control at Old Trafford gives them a higher probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 44% each, while the league average BTTS is 55%; in the last 5 matches Man United recorded BTTS 60% versus Nottingham’s 40%, which slightly favors the "both teams to score" scenario. United generate xG 1.66 per match but actually score only 1.06 goals per match with a low conversion rate of 7%, indicating the hosts create chances (xG 1.66) but are often inefficient. Conversely Nottingham have xG_for 1.22 and xG_against 1.62, score 1.44 goals per match on average, and scored 10 goals in their last 5 fixtures (2.0 per match) with a conversion rate of 14%, so the visitors are capable of finishing. Clean sheets for both teams are uncommon (United 22%, Nottingham 28%) and the league averages 2.76 goals per match, which reduces the likelihood of No Goal outcomes. On this basis I assess BTTS at 60% (Yes) and 40% (No) as the best pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Season xG are 1.66 for Manchester and 1.22 for Nottingham, giving a combined xG of ~2.90, which points to almost 3 expected goals in the match. Manchester averages 15 shots (3.94 on target), Nottingham 10 shots (4.22 on target); with conversion rates of 7% for the home side versus 14% for the visitors, the away team is more efficient in turning chances into goals (seasonal goals per match 1.06 vs 1.44). Over statistics show Manchester with 72% of matches Over 1.5 goals, Nottingham 89%, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams have 60% of matches Over 2.5, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. A model based on the combined xG of 2.90 translates to estimates of approximately 79% for Over 1.5, ~55% for Over 2.5 and ~33% for Over 3.5. Given the high Over 1.5 rates (72% vs 89%), low clean sheet rates (22% and 28%) and combined xG ~2.9, I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with an away win at full-time (X/2). The home side drew at half-time in 61% of their matches and score on average 0.39 goals by the break, while the visitors average 0.61 goals before half-time and lead at the break in 28% of games. The visitors dominate after the break — they earn an average of 1.67 points in second halves and win second halves in 44% of cases, compared to 1.06 points and 22% second-half wins for the hosts. Additionally, the visitors have a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs. 7% for the hosts) and average 4.22 shots on target per match versus 3.94, and the hosts concede many late goals (the hosts conceded 10 goals in the 76–90' window, the visitors scored 7 in that period), which favors a turnaround after half-time. On this basis I assigned the highest probability to X/2 (26%), with the next most likely outcomes being X/X (20%) and 2/2 (20%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Manchester United | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nottingham Forest is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Manchester United · 2.2 pts / match - Nottingham Forest
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Manchester United is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.75 goals / match - Manchester United · 1.25 goals / match - Nottingham Forest
Manchester United scores in 89% of matches (32 of 36 matches), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).
Nottingham Forest scores in 61% of matches (22 of 36 matches), while Manchester United keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Manchester United
Over / Under - Nottingham Forest
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Manchester United is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Manchester United · 0.97 pts / match - Nottingham Forest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Manchester United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nottingham Forest - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Manchester United
Nottingham Forest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Manchester United | Liga | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.08 | 2.76 | ▼ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 55% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 26% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 79% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Manchester United 0 - 1 - 0 Nottingham Forest. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?
The Premier League match finished Manchester United 3:2 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?
Manchester United score 1.75 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.25. The Premier League average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Manchester United's matches and 44% of Nottingham Forest's.
What form are Manchester United and Nottingham Forest in?
Over the last 5 games Manchester United have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


