Italy - Serie BData current as of 12 September 2026

Mantova vs Cesena: match statistics

Mantova crest
Mantova
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Cesena crest
Cesena
135%(2.34)
X35%(3.30)
230%(2.73)

Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams. Mantova presents solid home form with a 40% home win rate and a favorable goal difference in their last 5 matches (8 scored, 6 conceded). The home team dominates in ball possession (61%) and creates more chances (1.75 xG). Cesena, on the other hand, shows an identical away win rate (40%), although their recent form raises concerns (0 wins in 5 matches, only 0.6 points per match). The visitors have lower xG statistics (1.26) and find the net less frequently on the road (1.13 goals/match). Taking into account Mantova's advantage in home games and Cesena's weaker disposition in recent weeks, combined with the similarity in overall efficiency indicators, a draw or a narrow victory for the hosts seems to be the most likely outcome.

Mantova vs Cesena: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mantova played Cesena in Serie B (Italy). The match was played on 17 March 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Mantova: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Cesena: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mantova scores 1.07 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Cesena scores 1.27 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mantova 57%, Cesena 67%. Over 2.5: Mantova 50%, Cesena 57%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Mantova has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.43. Mantova: 14.2 shots per match, Cesena: 12.7.

Match halves

Mantova: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.57. Cesena: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Mantova: 76-90+ (10 goals). Cesena: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie B: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams. Mantova presents solid home form with a 40% home win rate and a favorable goal difference in their last 5 matches (8 scored, 6 conceded). The home team dominates in ball possession (61%) and creates more chances (1.75 xG). Cesena, on the other hand, shows an identical away win rate (40%), although their recent form raises concerns (0 wins in 5 matches, only 0.6 points per match). The visitors have lower xG statistics (1.26) and find the net less frequently on the road (1.13 goals/match). Taking into account Mantova's advantage in home games and Cesena's weaker disposition in recent weeks, combined with the similarity in overall efficiency indicators, a draw or a narrow victory for the hosts seems to be the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
MantovaCesena
20Shots13
MantovaCesena
4Shots on target3
MantovaCesena
2.03xG1.3
MantovaCesena
5Corners3
MantovaCesena
68Dangerous attacks37
MantovaCesena
20Fouls16
MantovaCesena
1Cards2
MantovaCesena

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.07Goals scored / match1.27
MantovaCesena
1.53Goals conceded / match1.43
MantovaCesena
58%Average possession49%
MantovaCesena
4.83Shots on target / match4.13
MantovaCesena

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.17Shots per match12.7
MantovaCesena
4.83Shots on target4.13
MantovaCesena
7.5%Shot conversion10%
MantovaCesena
58%Possession49%
MantovaCesena
1.56xG for1.43
MantovaCesena
1.44xG against1.45
MantovaCesena

Shooting quality

Mantova: DominantCesena: Balanced
MantovaCesena
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mantova is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mantova · 0.6 pts / match - Cesena

Mantova
WDLWD
Season result split
27% W23% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-15
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Cesena
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
37% W23% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-12
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cesena is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - Mantova · 1.27 goals / match - Cesena

Cesena is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - Mantova · 1.43 goals / match - Cesena

Mantova scoring profile: very strong

Mantova scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Cesena keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).

Cesena scoring profile: very strong

Cesena scores in 80% of matches (24 of 30 matches), while Mantova keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).

32Goals scored (season)38
MantovaCesena
46Goals conceded (season)43
MantovaCesena
2.6Average goals in match2.7
MantovaCesena
8Goals scored (last 5)6
MantovaCesena
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
MantovaCesena

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal80%
MantovaCesena
33%2 goals37%
MantovaCesena
3%3 goals10%
MantovaCesena
3%4 goals0%
MantovaCesena

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal83%
MantovaCesena
37%2 goals37%
MantovaCesena
20%3 goals20%
MantovaCesena
7%4 goals3%
MantovaCesena

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time27%
MantovaCesena
7%BTTS in both halves3%
MantovaCesena
20%Scored in both halves27%
MantovaCesena

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
MantovaCesena
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
MantovaCesena
80%BTTS - last 580%
MantovaCesena

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
MantovaCesena
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
MantovaCesena
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
MantovaCesena

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
MantovaCesena
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
MantovaCesena
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
MantovaCesena

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cesena is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Mantova · 1.3 pts / match - Cesena

Mantova - half-time state
23% leading37% draw40% trailing
Cesena - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.3
MantovaCesena
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.6
MantovaCesena
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
MantovaCesena
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.23
MantovaCesena
47%Clean sheet before half-time53%
MantovaCesena
60%No goal before half-time47%
MantovaCesena

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.1
MantovaCesena
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
MantovaCesena
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
MantovaCesena
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.47
MantovaCesena
50%Clean sheet after half-time40%
MantovaCesena
53%No goal after half-time47%
MantovaCesena

Mantova - second-half results

30% W33% D37% L
32
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cesena - second-half results

23% W40% D37% L
39
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mantova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Cesena - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mantova
ScoredConceded
3
10
0-15
6
6
16-30
6
8
31-45
4
9
46-60
3
6
61-75
10
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Cesena
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
4
11
16-30
11
7
31-45
9
8
46-60
4
7
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+89%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mantova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Cesena

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).

Teams vs league

MantovaLigaCesena
Average goals in match 2.602.53 2.70
Both teams scored 57%55% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%49% 57%
Clean sheets 17%27% 17%
Goal before half-time 73%72% 73%
Goal after half-time 80%75% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CesenaGoalGiovanni Zaro
  2. CesenaYellow cardAndrea Ciofi
  3. CesenaYellow cardMatteo Piacentini
  4. CesenaSubstitutionOn: Alberto CerriOff: Giacomo Vrioni
  5. MantovaYellow cardSimone Trimboli
  6. CesenaSubstitutionOn: Marco OlivieriOff: Tommaso Corazza

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mantova 0 - 0 - 1 Cesena. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mantova vs Cesena?

The Serie B match finished Mantova 3:0 Cesena. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mantova vs Cesena?

Mantova score 1.07 goals per game on average and Cesena 1.27. The Serie B average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Mantova's matches and 67% of Cesena's.

What form are Mantova and Cesena in?

Over the last 5 games Mantova have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Cesena 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mantova vs Cesena?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mantova vs Cesena: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.