Italy - Serie BStadio Danilo MartelliData current as of 02 November 2026

Mantova vs Pisa: match statistics

Mantova crest
Mantova
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Pisa crest
Pisa

Mantova vs Pisa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mantova played Pisa in Serie B (Italy). The match was played on 20 September 2026. Venue: Stadio Danilo Martelli. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Mantova: 3-1-0, 2.50 points/match. Pisa: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mantova scores 2.00 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Pisa scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mantova 75%, Pisa 50%. Over 2.5: Mantova 50%, Pisa 75%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Pisa has higher xG: 1.89 vs 1.34. Mantova: 11.5 shots per match, Pisa: 16.8.

Match halves

Mantova: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Pisa: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Mantova: 61-75 (3 goals). Pisa: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie B: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mantova are top of the table and remain unbeaten in their four league matches so far, recording 3 wins and a draw, while Pisa have a record of 2 wins and 2 defeats. The hosts have won both of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while also keeping a clean sheet in 50% of those fixtures. Pisa also won their only away match to date 3:0, but their recent overall form is weaker: they have suffered 3 defeats in five matches and conceded 9 goals during that run, compared with Mantova’s 8. Mantova create slightly higher-quality chances, averaging 1.54 xG compared with Pisa’s 1.44, while also limiting opponents to a lower xG: 1.05 versus 1.40. The visitors are dangerous thanks to a 25% conversion rate and 7 shots on target per match, but the hosts’ advantage in current consistency and defensive strength points to a Mantova victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Mantova has recorded BTTS in 67% of its matches this season, with the rate rising to 80% over the last five games; during this period, the team averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. Pisa had BTTS in only 40% of its last five matches, but conceded 1.8 goals per game over that span, which should increase the hosts’ chances of finding the net. The visitors regularly create chances worth 1.63 xG, while Mantova allows opponents 1.36 xG, making a Pisa goal a realistic scenario. The strongest argument against BTTS is Pisa’s 100% clean-sheet record in the season data, but this sample contrasts with the nine goals conceded in the last five matches. With the league BTTS average at 60%, the more likely outcome is for both teams to score — BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The chance-creation profile points to a match with at least two goals: Mantova generate an average of 2.04 xG at home, while Pisa allow 1.40 xG away from home. Pisa, in turn, average 1.44 xG in attack, virtually identical to the 1.43 xG conceded by Mantova, so the visitors should create chances of their own. In their last five matches, Mantova averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Pisa conceded as many as 1.8 goals per match. Over 2.5 goals is only marginally preferred, despite landing in 60% of Mantova’s recent matches and 80% of Pisa’s, because Pisa have kept a clean sheet in all of their away matches so far this season. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, supported by a projected 2.85 goals and the fact that both teams have cleared this line in 67% and 100% of their league matches, respectively.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Pisa leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full time, as the visitors have won 100% of their matches so far, averaging 3.0 goals scored and conceding none. Pisa were ahead at half-time in 100% of their away fixtures, scoring an average of 1.0 goal before the break and likewise keeping a clean sheet during that period. Mantova conceded an average of 1.33 goals in the first halves and 2.0 across entire matches, reinforcing the scenario of an early advantage for the visitors. The hosts do create plenty of chances, as indicated by an xG of 2.04 and 18.33 shots per match, but their conversion rate is only 5%, compared with Pisa’s 25%. Mantova’s better recent form, with 60% wins in their last five matches, increases the chances of a half-time draw or a turnaround, but it does not eliminate the visitors’ clear defensive advantage.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
MantovaPisa
14Shots14
MantovaPisa
3Shots on target5
MantovaPisa
1.45xG1.5
MantovaPisa
5Corners5
MantovaPisa
48Dangerous attacks36
MantovaPisa
13Fouls13
MantovaPisa
4Cards3
MantovaPisa

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.5
MantovaPisa
0.75Goals conceded / match1.5
MantovaPisa
46%Average possession48%
MantovaPisa
5.5Shots on target / match7.25
MantovaPisa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match16.75
MantovaPisa
5.5Shots on target7.25
MantovaPisa
17.4%Shot conversion9%
MantovaPisa
46%Possession48%
MantovaPisa
1.34xG for1.89
MantovaPisa
1.33xG against1.42
MantovaPisa

Shooting quality

Mantova: Counter-attackingPisa: Attacking
MantovaPisa
Accuracy (shots on target)48%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mantova is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2.5 pts / match - Mantova · 1.5 pts / match - Pisa

Mantova
WWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W25% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%
Pisa
LWWL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mantova is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Mantova · 1.5 goals / match - Pisa

Mantova is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Mantova · 1.5 goals / match - Pisa

Mantova scoring profile: very strong

Mantova scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Pisa scoring profile: very strong

Pisa scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Mantova keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

8Goals scored (season)6
MantovaPisa
3Goals conceded (season)6
MantovaPisa
2.75Average goals in match3
MantovaPisa
8Goals scored (last 5)6
MantovaPisa
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
MantovaPisa

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
MantovaPisa
75%2 goals50%
MantovaPisa
25%3 goals25%
MantovaPisa
0%4 goals0%
MantovaPisa

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
MantovaPisa
0%2 goals25%
MantovaPisa
0%3 goals25%
MantovaPisa
0%4 goals25%
MantovaPisa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
MantovaPisa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MantovaPisa
25%Scored in both halves25%
MantovaPisa

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
MantovaPisa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
MantovaPisa
75%BTTS - last 550%
MantovaPisa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
MantovaPisa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
MantovaPisa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
MantovaPisa

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
MantovaPisa
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
MantovaPisa
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MantovaPisa

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mantova is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Mantova · 1.75 pts / match - Pisa

Mantova - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Pisa - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.75
MantovaPisa
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.75
MantovaPisa
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
MantovaPisa
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.75
MantovaPisa
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
MantovaPisa
50%No goal before half-time50%
MantovaPisa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)1.25
MantovaPisa
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
MantovaPisa
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
MantovaPisa
2.25Average goals (2nd half)1.25
MantovaPisa
25%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MantovaPisa
25%No goal after half-time50%
MantovaPisa

Mantova - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pisa - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mantova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.75
Goals scored / match0.51.5
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.52.3
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet100%25%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pisa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.751.25
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.5
Average goals in match1.81.3
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mantova
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Pisa
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mantova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Pisa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).

Teams vs league

MantovaLigaPisa
Average goals in match▲ 2.752.60▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 75%63%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%52%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▲ 25%20%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%63%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%88%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MantovaYellow cardAlessio Castellini
  2. MantovaYellow cardJonathan Silva Pertinhes
  3. MantovaSubstitutionOn: Vanja VlahovićOff: Ettore Gliozzi
  4. PisaSubstitutionOn: İsak VuralOff: Giuseppe Leone
  5. PisaYellow cardAlessandro Confente
  6. PisaYellow cardArturo Calabresi
  7. MantovaYellow cardIsmael Cajazzo
  8. MantovaYellow cardStefano Cella

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mantova vs Pisa?

The Serie B match finished Mantova 2:2 Pisa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mantova vs Pisa?

Mantova score 2.00 goals per game on average and Pisa 1.50. The Serie B average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Mantova's matches and 50% of Pisa's.

What form are Mantova and Pisa in?

Over the last 5 games Mantova have a 3-1-0 record (2.50 points per game) and Pisa 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mantova vs Pisa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.