Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Marines vs APR: match statistics

Marines crest
Marines
2 : 2half-time 2:0
APR crest
APR
130%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
235%(0.00)

APR occupies 2nd place in the table and presents a significantly better overall record (11 wins, 9 draws, 2 losses) compared to Marines in 9th position (8-4-9). The visitors possess a higher average ball possession (54% vs 46%) and a better xG indicator away (1.18 vs 1.03 for the hosts at home), evidencing their qualitative advantage. Marines have not won a single time in their last 5 matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), conceding as many as 11 goals, while APR earned 1.2 points per match during this period. Although Marines have a decent home record (50% wins), APR frequently draws in away matches (50% draws), making a draw just as likely as an away win. Considering the hosts' poor form and APR's solidity, I predict a favorable result for the visitors or a draw.

Marines vs APR: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Marines played APR in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 7 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Marines: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. APR: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Marines scores 1.19 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. APR scores 1.36 and concedes 0.77. League average: 2.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Marines 48%, APR 55%. Over 2.5: Marines 33%, APR 45%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

APR has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.23. Marines: 8.0 shots per match, APR: 8.5.

Match halves

Marines: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.52. APR: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Marines: 31-45+ (9 goals). APR: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

APR occupies 2nd place in the table and presents a significantly better overall record (11 wins, 9 draws, 2 losses) compared to Marines in 9th position (8-4-9). The visitors possess a higher average ball possession (54% vs 46%) and a better xG indicator away (1.18 vs 1.03 for the hosts at home), evidencing their qualitative advantage. Marines have not won a single time in their last 5 matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), conceding as many as 11 goals, while APR earned 1.2 points per match during this period. Although Marines have a decent home record (50% wins), APR frequently draws in away matches (50% draws), making a draw just as likely as an away win. Considering the hosts' poor form and APR's solidity, I predict a favorable result for the visitors or a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
MarinesAPR
-1Shots-1
MarinesAPR
-1Shots on target-1
MarinesAPR
0xG0
MarinesAPR
2Corners8
MarinesAPR
37Dangerous attacks56
MarinesAPR
-1Fouls-1
MarinesAPR
-1Cards-1
MarinesAPR

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.19Goals scored / match1.36
MarinesAPR
1.14Goals conceded / match0.77
MarinesAPR
48%Average possession54%
MarinesAPR
3.05Shots on target / match3
MarinesAPR

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.95Shots per match8.5
MarinesAPR
3.05Shots on target3
MarinesAPR
15%Shot conversion16%
MarinesAPR
48%Possession54%
MarinesAPR
1.23xG for1.28
MarinesAPR
1.16xG against0.99
MarinesAPR

Shooting quality

Marines: Efficient finishingAPR: Efficient finishing
MarinesAPR
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APR is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Marines · 1.2 pts / match - APR

Marines
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W19% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-9
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%
APR
DLDDW
Season result split
50% W41% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-2
1.91 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APR is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.19 goals / match - Marines · 1.36 goals / match - APR

APR is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Marines · 0.77 goals / match - APR

Marines scoring profile: strong

Marines scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while APR keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).

APR scoring profile: strong

APR scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Marines keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

25Goals scored (season)30
MarinesAPR
24Goals conceded (season)17
MarinesAPR
2.33Average goals in match2.14
MarinesAPR
7Goals scored (last 5)6
MarinesAPR
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
MarinesAPR

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal77%
MarinesAPR
33%2 goals50%
MarinesAPR
5%3 goals9%
MarinesAPR
0%4 goals0%
MarinesAPR

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal59%
MarinesAPR
29%2 goals14%
MarinesAPR
10%3 goals5%
MarinesAPR
5%4 goals0%
MarinesAPR

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
MarinesAPR
5%BTTS in both halves0%
MarinesAPR
19%Scored in both halves23%
MarinesAPR

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
MarinesAPR
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
MarinesAPR
100%BTTS - last 580%
MarinesAPR

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
MarinesAPR
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
MarinesAPR
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
MarinesAPR

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
MarinesAPR
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
MarinesAPR
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MarinesAPR

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Marines - half-time state
48% leading29% draw24% trailing
APR - half-time state
41% leading41% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.64
MarinesAPR
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.73
MarinesAPR
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
MarinesAPR
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.14
MarinesAPR
62%Clean sheet before half-time68%
MarinesAPR
43%No goal before half-time50%
MarinesAPR

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.5
MarinesAPR
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
MarinesAPR
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
MarinesAPR
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1
MarinesAPR
57%Clean sheet after half-time64%
MarinesAPR
57%No goal after half-time50%
MarinesAPR

Marines - second-half results

24% W43% R33% P
36
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 38%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

APR - second-half results

36% W41% R23% P
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Marines - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
APR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Marines
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
4
16-30
9
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
7
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

APR
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
9
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
5
0
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Marines

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

APR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

MarinesLigaAPR
Average goals in match 2.332.08 2.14
Both teams scored 48%45% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%34% 45%
Clean sheets 33%34% 41%
Goal before half-time 81%63% 68%
Goal after half-time 67%69% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.10
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Taïba Mbonyumwami⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Djibril Cheick Ouattara⚽ 2

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MarinesGoalTaïba Mbonyumwami
  2. APRGoalDjibril Cheick Ouattara
  3. APRGoalDjibril Cheick Ouattara

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Marines 0 - 0 - 1 APR. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Marines vs APR?

The National Soccer League match finished Marines 2:2 APR. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Marines vs APR?

Marines score 1.19 goals per game on average and APR 1.36. The National Soccer League average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Marines's matches and 55% of APR's.

What form are Marines and APR in?

Over the last 5 games Marines have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and APR 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Marines vs APR?

The statistical background for Marines vs APR — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.