Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueStade UmugandaData current as of 07 September 2026

Marines vs Muhanga: match statistics

Marines crest
Marines
3 : 2half-time 1:1
Muhanga crest
Muhanga

Marines vs Muhanga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Marines played Muhanga in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Stade Umuganda. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Marines: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Muhanga: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Marines scores 1.33 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Muhanga scores 0.70 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Marines 58%, Muhanga 33%. Over 2.5: Marines 42%, Muhanga 33%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Marines has higher xG: 1.15 vs 0.98. Marines: 6.9 shots per match, Muhanga: 5.4.

Match halves

Marines: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.48. Muhanga: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.24.

Goals by minute

Marines: 31-45+ (16 goals). Muhanga: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.11 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win; Marines have scored 44 goals this season versus Muhanga's 23, and in the last 5 matches the home side has netted 10 goals compared to the visitors' 5. At home Marines average 1.38 goals per game and concede 1.13, while Muhanga on the road manage only 0.63 goals per game and concede 1.5 on average, with a negative away goal difference of -14. Efficiency favors the hosts: Marines’ shot conversion is 17% versus Muhanga's 11%, with 2.54 shots on target per game for the home side and 2.43 for the visitors. Form must be considered — Muhanga average 2 points in their last 5 matches and have won 3 of 5, whereas Marines have just 1 point in their last 5 and one win, which raises the upset risk. Taking this into account I estimate probabilities of 65% for Marines, 20% for a draw and 15% for Muhanga.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season averages indicate low finishing: Marines score 0.76 goals/match and Muhanga 0.63, with average goals conceded 1.06 (home) and 1.50 (away). Season BTTS rates are 41% for Marines and only 25% for Muhanga, versus a league average of 46% — overall fewer Goal/Goal matches than the league. In the last 5 fixtures Marines show BTTS in 80% (avg 2.0 scored and 1.6 conceded), while Muhanga only 20% (1.0 scored, 0.6 conceded), so only the home side has recently been regularly involved in Goal/Goal games. Additionally, Muhanga have failed to score in 56% of seasonal matches despite xG 1.04 and 2.43 shots per game — they create chances but often do not convert, therefore I assign a higher probability to the No Goal scenario (clean sheet expected for one side).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Averaging offensive xG and opponent xG yields a forecast of 1.17 goals for Marines (0.93 home offensive xG and 1.40 xG conceded vs Muhanga) and 1.09 goals for Muhanga (1.04 away offensive xG and 1.13 xG conceded vs Marines), totaling approx. 2.26 goals. Season-long metrics confirm a moderate scoring environment: Marines scored 44 goals (0.76 per match), Muhanga 23 goals (0.63 per match), and the teams conceded 41 and 42 goals respectively. Over/under rates favor exceeding 1.5 goals — Marines had over 1.5 in 53% of matches, Muhanga in 69% (average ~61%) — while over 2.5 occurs less often: 29% and 38%. In the last 5 matches Marines recorded over 2.5 in 80% of games, whereas Muhanga had 0% in that period, which balances the forecast; the aggregate projection of 2.26 goals remains below the 2.5 threshold, therefore Under 2.5 is more likely than Over 2.5. Based on this I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (67% probability), while Over 2.5 (38%) and Over 3.5 (6%) are less likely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Marines show a stronger signal at Half-Time: they led at the break in 35% of matches versus 19% for Muhanga, and the average points scored by halftime is 1.35 for the hosts versus 0.94 for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Marines scored 12 goals by halftime, while Muhanga only 3, which demonstrates a clear home advantage in the first 45 minutes. The visitors concede on average 1.5 goals per match this season compared to 1.06 for the hosts, and xG indicates Muhanga generates slightly more xG (1.04 vs 0.93) but also allows higher xG against (1.4 vs 1.13), which favors Marines' more efficient conversion (hosts’ shot conversion rate 14% vs 11% for the visitors). Additionally, 71% of Marines’ matches have at least one goal by halftime, increasing the likelihood that the hosts will lead at the break. Based on this, the strongest signal is Marines leading at Half-Time and maintaining the win to Full-Time, therefore I select HT/FT 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
MarinesMuhanga
9Shots10
MarinesMuhanga
5Shots on target4
MarinesMuhanga
1.34xG1.51
MarinesMuhanga
3Corners5
MarinesMuhanga
57Dangerous attacks81
MarinesMuhanga
22Fouls15
MarinesMuhanga
0Cards0
MarinesMuhanga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match0.7
MarinesMuhanga
1.24Goals conceded / match1.27
MarinesMuhanga
44%Average possession45%
MarinesMuhanga
2.79Shots on target / match1.76
MarinesMuhanga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.88Shots per match5.42
MarinesMuhanga
2.79Shots on target1.76
MarinesMuhanga
19.4%Shot conversion12.8%
MarinesMuhanga
44%Possession45%
MarinesMuhanga
1.15xG for0.98
MarinesMuhanga
1.17xG against1.25
MarinesMuhanga

Shooting quality

Marines: Counter-attackingMuhanga: Counter-attacking
MarinesMuhanga
Accuracy (shots on target)41%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Muhanga is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Marines · 2 pts / match - Muhanga

Marines
DWLLD
Season result split
33% W27% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-13
1.27 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Muhanga
WWLDW
Season result split
27% W18% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.83Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Marines is 90% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Marines · 0.7 goals / match - Muhanga

Marines scoring profile: very strong

Marines scores in 82% of matches (27 of 33 matches), while Muhanga keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).

Muhanga scoring profile: strong

Muhanga scores in 52% of matches (17 of 33 matches), while Marines keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).

44Goals scored (season)23
MarinesMuhanga
41Goals conceded (season)42
MarinesMuhanga
2.58Average goals in match1.97
MarinesMuhanga
10Goals scored (last 5)5
MarinesMuhanga
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
MarinesMuhanga

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal52%
MarinesMuhanga
39%2 goals18%
MarinesMuhanga
9%3 goals0%
MarinesMuhanga
3%4 goals0%
MarinesMuhanga

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal76%
MarinesMuhanga
33%2 goals39%
MarinesMuhanga
9%3 goals12%
MarinesMuhanga
3%4 goals0%
MarinesMuhanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time15%
MarinesMuhanga
6%BTTS in both halves6%
MarinesMuhanga
21%Scored in both halves12%
MarinesMuhanga

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
MarinesMuhanga
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
MarinesMuhanga
80%BTTS - last 520%
MarinesMuhanga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
MarinesMuhanga
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
MarinesMuhanga
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
MarinesMuhanga

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
MarinesMuhanga
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
MarinesMuhanga
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MarinesMuhanga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Marines is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Marines · 1.15 pts / match - Muhanga

Marines - half-time state
45% leading33% draw21% trailing
Muhanga - half-time state
27% leading33% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1.15
MarinesMuhanga
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.45
MarinesMuhanga
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
MarinesMuhanga
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.06
MarinesMuhanga
58%Clean sheet before half-time55%
MarinesMuhanga
39%No goal before half-time61%
MarinesMuhanga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)0.82
MarinesMuhanga
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
MarinesMuhanga
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
MarinesMuhanga
1.24Average goals (2nd half)0.91
MarinesMuhanga
48%Clean sheet after half-time48%
MarinesMuhanga
58%No goal after half-time76%
MarinesMuhanga

Marines - second-half results

21% W39% R39% P
56
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding73%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Muhanga - second-half results

9% W55% R36% P
38
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Marines - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Muhanga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Marines
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
7
6
16-30
16
8
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
8
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Muhanga
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
7
9
16-30
4
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
7
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Marines

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Muhanga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

MarinesLigaMuhanga
Average goals in match 2.582.11 1.97
Both teams scored 58%46% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%38% 33%
Clean sheets 24%34% 24%
Goal before half-time 82%61% 70%
Goal after half-time 73%70% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.11
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.11
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Taïba Mbonyumwami⚽ 2

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MarinesGoalTaïba Mbonyumwami
  2. MarinesGoalTaïba Mbonyumwami

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Marines 1 - 0 - 0 Muhanga. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Muhanga
0 : 2
Marines

FAQ

What was the result of Marines vs Muhanga?

The National Soccer League match finished Marines 3:2 Muhanga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Marines vs Muhanga?

Marines score 1.33 goals per game on average and Muhanga 0.70. The National Soccer League average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Marines's matches and 33% of Muhanga's.

What form are Marines and Muhanga in?

Over the last 5 games Marines have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Muhanga 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Marines vs Muhanga?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Marines vs Muhanga: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.