Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Maroons vs Kitara: match statistics

Maroons crest
Maroons
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Kitara crest
Kitara
125%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Kitara sits in second place in the table and presents decidedly better form than Maroons, earning 2.4 points per match in the last five games compared to just 1.2 for the hosts. The visiting team has a significantly better overall record (10 wins, 1 draw, 3 losses) compared to Maroons (4 wins, 6 draws, 5 losses). Offensive statistics clearly favor Kitara – averaging 5.17 shots on target per away match versus 2.86 for the hosts, as well as a higher average xG (2.09 vs 1.28). Maroons have not lost at home this season and boast 75% clean sheets on their own turf, which may complicate the task for the visitors, yet Kitara's qualitative advantage and form argue for their victory. Kitara's recent streak of four wins and their 57% away efficiency point to a real chance of triumph in this match.

Maroons vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Maroons play Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 12 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Maroons: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kitara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Maroons scores 0.87 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.38 and concedes 0.72. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Maroons 30%, Kitara 38%. Over 2.5: Maroons 33%, Kitara 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.24. Maroons: 8.5 shots per match, Kitara: 11.3.

Match halves

Maroons: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.37. Kitara: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Maroons: 76-90+ (7 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kitara sits in second place in the table and presents decidedly better form than Maroons, earning 2.4 points per match in the last five games compared to just 1.2 for the hosts. The visiting team has a significantly better overall record (10 wins, 1 draw, 3 losses) compared to Maroons (4 wins, 6 draws, 5 losses). Offensive statistics clearly favor Kitara – averaging 5.17 shots on target per away match versus 2.86 for the hosts, as well as a higher average xG (2.09 vs 1.28). Maroons have not lost at home this season and boast 75% clean sheets on their own turf, which may complicate the task for the visitors, yet Kitara's qualitative advantage and form argue for their victory. Kitara's recent streak of four wins and their 57% away efficiency point to a real chance of triumph in this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
MaroonsKitara
6Shots4
MaroonsKitara
3Shots on target2
MaroonsKitara
1.13xG0.86
MaroonsKitara
6Corners2
MaroonsKitara
73Dangerous attacks63
MaroonsKitara
18Fouls13
MaroonsKitara
0Cards0
MaroonsKitara

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.87Goals scored / match1.38
MaroonsKitara
0.9Goals conceded / match0.72
MaroonsKitara
46%Average possession46%
MaroonsKitara
2.83Shots on target / match4.69
MaroonsKitara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.53Shots per match11.31
MaroonsKitara
2.83Shots on target4.69
MaroonsKitara
10.2%Shot conversion12.2%
MaroonsKitara
46%Possession46%
MaroonsKitara
1.24xG for1.65
MaroonsKitara
1.32xG against1.31
MaroonsKitara

Shooting quality

Maroons: BalancedKitara: Counter-attacking
MaroonsKitara
Accuracy (shots on target)33%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Maroons
DLDLW
Season result split
30% W37% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-10
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

0.87 goals / match - Maroons · 1.38 goals / match - Kitara

Kitara is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Maroons · 0.72 goals / match - Kitara

Maroons scoring profile: mixed

Maroons scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

Kitara scoring profile: strong

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Maroons keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

26Goals scored (season)40
MaroonsKitara
27Goals conceded (season)21
MaroonsKitara
1.77Average goals in match2.1
MaroonsKitara
3Goals scored (last 5)7
MaroonsKitara
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
MaroonsKitara

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal76%
MaroonsKitara
20%2 goals41%
MaroonsKitara
10%3 goals14%
MaroonsKitara
3%4 goals7%
MaroonsKitara

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal55%
MaroonsKitara
27%2 goals14%
MaroonsKitara
7%3 goals3%
MaroonsKitara
0%4 goals0%
MaroonsKitara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time10%
MaroonsKitara
3%BTTS in both halves3%
MaroonsKitara
13%Scored in both halves21%
MaroonsKitara

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
MaroonsKitara
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
MaroonsKitara
20%BTTS - last 560%
MaroonsKitara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
MaroonsKitara
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
MaroonsKitara
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
MaroonsKitara

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
MaroonsKitara
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
MaroonsKitara
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
MaroonsKitara

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Maroons · 1.93 pts / match - Kitara

Maroons - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing
Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.93
MaroonsKitara
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.9
MaroonsKitara
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.34
MaroonsKitara
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.24
MaroonsKitara
60%Clean sheet before half-time76%
MaroonsKitara
67%No goal before half-time38%
MaroonsKitara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.21
MaroonsKitara
0.37Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
MaroonsKitara
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
MaroonsKitara
0.7Average goals (2nd half)0.86
MaroonsKitara
70%Clean sheet after half-time62%
MaroonsKitara
67%No goal after half-time66%
MaroonsKitara

Maroons - second-half results

20% W63% R17% P
36
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Maroons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Maroons
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Maroons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
166%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

MaroonsLigaKitara
Average goals in match 1.772.09 2.10
Both teams scored 30%38% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%35% 31%
Clean sheets 43%39% 45%
Goal before half-time 63%59% 76%
Goal after half-time 50%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Maroons 0 - 0 - 1 Kitara. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Maroons vs Kitara?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Maroons 0:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Maroons vs Kitara?

Maroons score 0.87 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.38. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Maroons's matches and 38% of Kitara's.

What form are Maroons and Kitara in?

Over the last 5 games Maroons have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kitara 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maroons vs Kitara?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Maroons vs Kitara: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.