South Africa - Premier Soccer LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

Marumo Gallants vs Richards Bay: match statistics

Marumo Gallants crest
Marumo Gallants
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Richards Bay crest
Richards Bay

Marumo Gallants vs Richards Bay: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Marumo Gallants play Richards Bay in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Marumo Gallants: 0-5-0, 1.00 points/match. Richards Bay: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Marumo Gallants scores 0.70 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Richards Bay scores 0.77 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Marumo Gallants 53%, Richards Bay 43%. Over 2.5: Marumo Gallants 30%, Richards Bay 27%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Richards Bay has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.22. Marumo Gallants: 10.3 shots per match, Richards Bay: 11.2.

Match halves

Marumo Gallants: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.50. Richards Bay: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Marumo Gallants: 46-60 (5 goals). Richards Bay: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Soccer League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a draw ('X'), because Marumo Gallants register as many as 54% draws at home and average 0.77 goals scored versus 0.92 conceded, which favors a share of points. Richards Bay show better form over the last 5 matches (PPG 1.8, 2 wins and 3 draws; 5 scored and 3 conceded), but as visitors they average only 0.46 goals per game and suffer 54% away losses, which limits their effectiveness on the road. Both teams generate very similar chance metrics (xG 1.31 for Gallants vs 1.32 for Richards Bay) and comparable numbers of shots on target (2.92 vs 2.85), while the combined goals-per-game is 1.69, so a low number of clear-cut chances is expected. Additionally, the hosts have higher conversion (7% vs 4%) and are less often shut out at home (FTS 38% vs 54%), giving them a slight edge, but their poor form in the last 5 matches (PPG 0.8) makes a draw the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
15Shots9
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
2Shots on target2
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
1.59xG1.09
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
8Corners5
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
71Dangerous attacks53
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
10Fouls15
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
1Cards0
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0.7Goals scored / match0.77
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
1.27Goals conceded / match1
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
49%Average possession46%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
2.87Shots on target / match3.73
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.3Shots per match11.2
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
2.87Shots on target3.73
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
6.8%Shot conversion6.8%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
49%Possession46%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
1.22xG for1.35
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
1.5xG against1.51
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

Shooting quality

Marumo Gallants: BalancedRichards Bay: Balanced
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
Accuracy (shots on target)28%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Marumo Gallants is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Marumo Gallants · 0.8 pts / match - Richards Bay

Marumo Gallants
DDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W43% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-13-13
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-5-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-9-4
Last 5 at home
0-5-0
DDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 0%
Richards Bay
DDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W43% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-13-10
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Richards Bay is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.7 goals / match - Marumo Gallants · 0.77 goals / match - Richards Bay

Richards Bay is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Marumo Gallants · 1 goals / match - Richards Bay

Marumo Gallants scoring profile: mixed

Marumo Gallants scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Richards Bay keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

Richards Bay scoring profile: very strong

Richards Bay scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Marumo Gallants keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 30 matches).

21Goals scored (season)23
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
38Goals conceded (season)30
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
1.97Average goals in match1.77
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal63%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
13%2 goals13%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
3%3 goals0%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0%4 goals0%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal63%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
20%2 goals27%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
13%3 goals7%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
3%4 goals3%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time23%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
7%Scored in both halves13%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
80%BTTS - last 540%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Richards Bay is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.7 pts / match - Marumo Gallants · 1.23 pts / match - Richards Bay

Marumo Gallants - half-time state
3% leading60% draw37% trailing
Richards Bay - half-time state
20% leading63% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.7Points per match (1st half)1.23
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0.77Average goals (1st half)0.87
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
47%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
80%No goal before half-time57%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)0.97
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
1.2Average goals (2nd half)0.9
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
47%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay
60%No goal after half-time67%
Marumo GallantsRichards Bay

Marumo Gallants - second-half results

23% W43% R33% P
21
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding433%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Richards Bay - second-half results

17% W47% R37% P
37
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Marumo Gallants - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Richards Bay - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Marumo Gallants
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
4
7
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
9
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Richards Bay
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Marumo Gallants

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Richards Bay

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).

Teams vs league

Marumo GallantsLigaRichards Bay
Average goals in match 1.972.02 1.77
Both teams scored 53%39% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%30% 27%
Clean sheets 10%37% 37%
Goal before half-time 57%60% 57%
Goal after half-time 73%70% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.90
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Marumo Gallants 1 - 0 - 0 Richards Bay. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Richards Bay
1 : 2
Marumo Gallants

FAQ

What was the result of Marumo Gallants vs Richards Bay?

The Premier Soccer League match finished Marumo Gallants 1:1 Richards Bay. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Marumo Gallants vs Richards Bay?

Marumo Gallants score 0.70 goals per game on average and Richards Bay 0.77. The Premier Soccer League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Marumo Gallants's matches and 43% of Richards Bay's.

What form are Marumo Gallants and Richards Bay in?

Over the last 5 games Marumo Gallants have a 0-5-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Richards Bay 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Marumo Gallants vs Richards Bay?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Marumo Gallants vs Richards Bay: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.