Mārupe vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Mārupe vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mārupe play Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 18 July 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:4.
Current form
Mārupe: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mārupe scores 1.69 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 3.54 and concedes 0.85. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mārupe 46%, Metta - LU 54%. Over 2.5: Mārupe 77%, Metta - LU 85%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.83 vs 1.46. Mārupe: 9.5 shots per match, Metta - LU: 20.1.
Match halves
Mārupe: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.31. Metta - LU: half-time lead 85%, second-half goals 1.54.
Goals by minute
Mārupe: 76-90+ (8 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Metta - LU are clear favorites: they sit 1st (10 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) and have scored 42 goals this season, including 21 in the last 5 matches, while Mārupe have 6 wins and 22 goals overall and 7 goals in their last 5. Form underlines the gap — Metta have won 5 of their last 5 and are averaging 3 points per match in that run, whereas Mārupe have averaged 1.2 points in their last five and lost 3 of those 5. Metta create substantially more high-quality chances: away they average 19.25 shots and 8 on target with xG 2.47, while Mārupe at home average 11.6 shots and 5.2 on target with xG 1.62, which highlights Metta’s superiority in chance creation (2.47 xG vs 1.62 xG). Defensively Metta also perform better — conceding 0.8 goals on average away versus Mārupe’s 1.67 conceded at home and recording 40% clean sheets vs the hosts’ 33%. Considering the advantage in form, shot volume (19.25 vs 11.6), xG (2.47 vs 1.62) and goal balance (42–11 vs 22–15), I forecast an away win; I allocate probabilities: home 10%, draw 20%, away 70%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mārupe | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Metta - LU is 333% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Mārupe · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 109% better for: goals scored per match.
1.69 goals / match - Mārupe · 3.54 goals / match - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.46 goals / match - Mārupe · 0.85 goals / match - Metta - LU
Mārupe scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mārupe
Over / Under — Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Mārupe · 2.69 pts / match - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mārupe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 85% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +9 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mārupe
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Mārupe | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.15 | 3.43 | ▲ 4.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 60% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 77% | 68% | ▲ 85% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 23% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 71% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 84% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Mārupe vs Metta - LU?
The 1. Liga match finished Mārupe 0:4 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Metta - LU?
Mārupe score 1.69 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 3.54. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Mārupe's matches and 54% of Metta - LU's.
What form are Mārupe and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Metta - LU?
The statistical background for Mārupe vs Metta - LU — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.