Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Mārupe vs Metta - LU: match statistics

Mārupe crest
Mārupe
0 : 4half-time 0:1
Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU

Mārupe vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mārupe played Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Mārupe: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mārupe scores 1.83 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 3.50 and concedes 0.92. League average: 3.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mārupe 50%, Metta - LU 58%. Over 2.5: Mārupe 75%, Metta - LU 83%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.86 vs 1.53. Mārupe: 9.9 shots per match, Metta - LU: 20.3.

Match halves

Mārupe: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.42. Metta - LU: half-time lead 83%, second-half goals 1.42.

Goals by minute

Mārupe: 76-90+ (8 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.47 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metta - LU are clear favorites: they sit 1st (10 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) and have scored 42 goals this season, including 21 in the last 5 matches, while Mārupe have 6 wins and 22 goals overall and 7 goals in their last 5. Form underlines the gap — Metta have won 5 of their last 5 and are averaging 3 points per match in that run, whereas Mārupe have averaged 1.2 points in their last five and lost 3 of those 5. Metta create substantially more high-quality chances: away they average 19.25 shots and 8 on target with xG 2.47, while Mārupe at home average 11.6 shots and 5.2 on target with xG 1.62, which highlights Metta’s superiority in chance creation (2.47 xG vs 1.62 xG). Defensively Metta also perform better — conceding 0.8 goals on average away versus Mārupe’s 1.67 conceded at home and recording 40% clean sheets vs the hosts’ 33%. Considering the advantage in form, shot volume (19.25 vs 11.6), xG (2.47 vs 1.62) and goal balance (42–11 vs 22–15), I forecast an away win; I allocate probabilities: home 10%, draw 20%, away 70%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a high BTTS rate this season: Mārupe 57% and Metta 60%, while the league BTTS rate is 62%, which initially favors a Goal/Goal outcome. The signal is even stronger over the last 5 matches — Mārupe has BTTS in 60% of those games and Metta in 80%, with average goals of 1.4 (Mārupe) and 4.2 (Metta) in that period. Creativity metrics confirm an attacking profile: season xG is 3.08 for Mārupe and 2.47 for Metta, and shots on target per match are 14.0 vs 8.0, with conversion rates of 18% and 13%. At the same time, neither team is defensively airtight — season goals conceded are 1.0 (Mārupe) and 0.8 (Metta), and in the last 5 matches they concede 1.6 and 1.2 goals respectively, increasing the likelihood of both sides scoring. Considering the seasonal 57%/60%, last 5 matches 60%/80%, high xG 3.08 vs 2.47 and frequent shots on target, I tip BTTS - Yes with an 80% probability.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect Mārupe to score about 2.03 goals and Metta - LU about 1.53 goals, totaling 3.56 goals. This projection is supported by xG: Mārupe xG_for 3.08 vs Metta xG_against 0.97 and Metta xG_for 2.47 vs Mārupe xG_against 0.60, indicating a clear attacking edge for the home side. Seasonal metrics show Mārupe has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Metta 80%, and the over 2.5 percentages are 86% for Mārupe and 80% for Metta; the league averages 3.48 goals per match. Additionally, Metta averages 4.2 goals in the last 5 matches (gf_last5=21) with last5 xG_for 2.54, while Mārupe averages 14.0 shots on target with an 18% conversion rate (vs 8.0 and 13% for Metta), which increases the probability of further goals. The strongest signal is therefore the over 1.5 line, as the historical 100%/80% for over1.5 combined with an expected 3.56 goals gives a clear edge to that option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is 1/1: I assign this scenario a 40% probability. Mārupe led at the break in 6 of 7 matches (86%) and scores an average of 2.43 goals in the first half with 0.0 conceded, while Metta - LU has 1.5 HT goals and 0.25 first-half concessions. Over the full match Mārupe averages 4.29 goals per game versus Metta’s 2.4, xG 3.08 versus 2.47, 14 shots on target versus 8 and 23.86 total shots versus 19.25, which supports holding the lead through to full-time. Nevertheless Metta are in excellent form (5 wins in their last 5 matches) and have led at the break in 4 of their last 5 fixtures (80%), so I also assign moderate chances to draw and turnaround scenarios after the interval (1/X 12%, X/X 10%, X/2 10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
MārupeMetta - LU
5Shots19
MārupeMetta - LU
2Shots on target10
MārupeMetta - LU
0.69xG2.49
MārupeMetta - LU
2Corners7
MārupeMetta - LU
31Dangerous attacks83
MārupeMetta - LU
18Fouls13
MārupeMetta - LU
0Cards0
MārupeMetta - LU

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match3.5
MārupeMetta - LU
1.25Goals conceded / match0.92
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Average possession55%
MārupeMetta - LU
4.5Shots on target / match10.75
MārupeMetta - LU

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.92Shots per match20.25
MārupeMetta - LU
4.5Shots on target10.75
MārupeMetta - LU
18.5%Shot conversion17.3%
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Possession55%
MārupeMetta - LU
1.53xG for2.86
MārupeMetta - LU
1.06xG against0.74
MārupeMetta - LU

Shooting quality

Mārupe: Efficient finishingMetta - LU: Dominant
MārupeMetta - LU
Accuracy (shots on target)45%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Mārupe · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU

Mārupe
WLLLW
Season result split
50% W8% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-5
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Metta - LU
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
83% W8% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-1-1
2.58 pts / match · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.26Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 91% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - Mārupe · 3.5 goals / match - Metta - LU

Metta - LU is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Mārupe · 0.92 goals / match - Metta - LU

Mārupe scoring profile: strong

Mārupe scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).

22Goals scored (season)42
MārupeMetta - LU
15Goals conceded (season)11
MārupeMetta - LU
3.08Average goals in match4.42
MārupeMetta - LU
8Goals scored (last 5)19
MārupeMetta - LU
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
MārupeMetta - LU

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal100%
MārupeMetta - LU
50%2 goals83%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%3 goals67%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%4 goals33%
MārupeMetta - LU

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal58%
MārupeMetta - LU
42%2 goals25%
MārupeMetta - LU
17%3 goals8%
MārupeMetta - LU
8%4 goals0%
MārupeMetta - LU

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time8%
MārupeMetta - LU
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MārupeMetta - LU
17%Scored in both halves75%
MārupeMetta - LU

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
MārupeMetta - LU
60%BTTS - last 5100%
MārupeMetta - LU

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
MārupeMetta - LU
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
MārupeMetta - LU

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
MārupeMetta - LU
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
MārupeMetta - LU

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 128% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Mārupe · 2.67 pts / match - Metta - LU

Mārupe - half-time state
25% leading42% draw33% trailing
Metta - LU - half-time state
83% leading17% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)2.67
MārupeMetta - LU
0.42Goals scored (1st half)1.92
MārupeMetta - LU
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.08
MārupeMetta - LU
0.92Average goals (1st half)2
MārupeMetta - LU
58%Clean sheet before half-time92%
MārupeMetta - LU
67%No goal before half-time17%
MārupeMetta - LU

After half-time (2nd half)

1.42Points per match (2nd half)1.83
MārupeMetta - LU
1.42Goals scored (2nd half)1.42
MārupeMetta - LU
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
MārupeMetta - LU
2.17Average goals (2nd half)2.08
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Clean sheet after half-time58%
MārupeMetta - LU
33%No goal after half-time17%
MārupeMetta - LU

Mārupe - second-half results

42% W17% R42% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metta - LU - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
32
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+22
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 83% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mārupe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.20
Goals scored / match2.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.01.2
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+110
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 11

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
5
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
7
1
16-30
10
0
31-45
3
5
46-60
4
1
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
220%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

MārupeLigaMetta - LU
Average goals in match 3.083.47 4.42
Both teams scored 50%62% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%68% 83%
Clean sheets 42%22% 42%
Goal before half-time 67%72% 83%
Goal after half-time 92%85% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.47
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.88
Home goals / match
1.59
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  2. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  3. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mārupe vs Metta - LU?

The 1. Liga match finished Mārupe 0:4 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Metta - LU?

Mārupe score 1.83 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 3.50. The 1. Liga average is 3.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's matches and 58% of Metta - LU's.

What form are Mārupe and Metta - LU in?

Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Metta - LU?

The statistical background for Mārupe vs Metta - LU — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.