Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 17 October 2026

Mārupe vs Super Nova II: match statistics

Mārupe crest
Mārupe
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II

Mārupe vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mārupe played Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 15 August 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Mārupe: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Super Nova II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mārupe scores 1.63 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Super Nova II scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44. League average: 3.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mārupe 50%, Super Nova II 63%. Over 2.5: Mārupe 75%, Super Nova II 44%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Mārupe has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.13. Mārupe: 9.8 shots per match, Super Nova II: 7.6.

Match halves

Mārupe: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 1.25. Super Nova II: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Mārupe: 76-90+ (9 goals). Super Nova II: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.58 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mārupe have a higher average goals-per-game figure at home—1.75 compared with Super Nova II’s 1.50 away—as well as more shots on target per match: 4.57 to 4.38. However, the hosts are in poor form, having lost 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring just 4 goals and conceding 11 in that run. Super Nova II have also won only once in their last five matches, but their defence has conceded 7 goals, clearly fewer than their opponents. The key factor is the visitors’ high away draw rate of 50%, while they lose just 25% of their matches on the road. Mārupe should enjoy more possession, averaging 53%, but the hosts’ weak defence, conceding 1.88 goals per match, limits their chances of taking all three points. Therefore, a draw is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes has a moderate edge, as Super Nova II have scored in every match this season, while their BTTS rate stands at as high as 75%, compared with 50% for Mārupe. The hosts concede an average of 1.25 goals, but their defence has clearly weakened over the last five matches, allowing opponents to score 2.2 goals per game, with an xG against of 2.00. Mārupe have scored only 0.8 goals per game recently, but Super Nova II allow opponents a high average xG of 1.88 and have conceded 7 goals in their last five fixtures. The main risk is the lower attacking efficiency of both teams over their last five matches; however, the combination of the hosts' weak defence and the visitors' consistent scoring record supports goals at both ends more strongly than a scenario in which one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Super Nova II score an average of 1.50 goals per match and have found the net at least once in 100% of their games, while Mārupe concede an average of 1.25 goals. The hosts have allowed opponents chances worth 1.47 xG, and their last five matches produced as many as 2.20 goals conceded per game. The visitors’ defence is also vulnerable, conceding an average of 1.63 goals and 1.88 xG, which supports a projection of around 1.40 goals for Mārupe. The Over 1.5 goals line has been covered in 100% of Super Nova II matches and 63% of Mārupe’s games, making it clearly safer than the more balanced 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Super Nova II victory, as Mārupe have drawn at the break in 60% of their last five matches and scored just 0.2 goals per game during the opening half. The visitors have made the stronger start over this period: they led at the break in 40% of their matches and scored an average of 0.6 goals, while the hosts have not once gone into half-time ahead. After the interval, the advantage shifts to the away side, who average 1.0 goals in second halves compared with Mārupe’s 0.5, while the hosts concede 0.88 goals per match during that period. Current form further favours the visitors: Mārupe have lost four of their last five matches and conceded an average of 2.2 goals in those games, whereas Super Nova II have suffered only two defeats and recorded draws in 40% of those matches. Although the hosts have a higher season-long win rate, 50% compared with 25%, their poor recent form and the five goals conceded between the 76th and 90th minutes reinforce the scenario of an away-side turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
MārupeSuper Nova II
13Shots11
MārupeSuper Nova II
4Shots on target5
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.49xG1.41
MārupeSuper Nova II
5Corners3
MārupeSuper Nova II
53Dangerous attacks48
MārupeSuper Nova II
11Fouls13
MārupeSuper Nova II
0Cards0
MārupeSuper Nova II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MārupeSuper Nova II
1.63Goals scored / match1.44
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.56Goals conceded / match1.44
MārupeSuper Nova II
45%Average possession44%
MārupeSuper Nova II
4.31Shots on target / match3.5
MārupeSuper Nova II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.75Shots per match7.56
MārupeSuper Nova II
4.31Shots on target3.5
MārupeSuper Nova II
16.7%Shot conversion19%
MārupeSuper Nova II
45%Possession44%
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.54xG for1.13
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.25xG against1.69
MārupeSuper Nova II

Shooting quality

Mārupe: Counter-attackingSuper Nova II: Counter-attacking
MārupeSuper Nova II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mārupe is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Mārupe · 1 pts / match - Super Nova II

Mārupe
WLWLL
Season result split
44% W6% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-8
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Super Nova II
DLDLW
Season result split
38% W31% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-5
1.44 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mārupe is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - Mārupe · 1.44 goals / match - Super Nova II

Super Nova II is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Mārupe · 1.44 goals / match - Super Nova II

Mārupe scoring profile: very strong

Mārupe scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

26Goals scored (season)23
MārupeSuper Nova II
25Goals conceded (season)23
MārupeSuper Nova II
3.19Average goals in match2.88
MārupeSuper Nova II
6Goals scored (last 5)5
MārupeSuper Nova II
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
MārupeSuper Nova II

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal81%
MārupeSuper Nova II
50%2 goals44%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%3 goals19%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%4 goals0%
MārupeSuper Nova II

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
MārupeSuper Nova II
44%2 goals25%
MārupeSuper Nova II
25%3 goals19%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%4 goals6%
MārupeSuper Nova II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
MārupeSuper Nova II
6%BTTS in both halves0%
MārupeSuper Nova II
19%Scored in both halves25%
MārupeSuper Nova II

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
MārupeSuper Nova II
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
MārupeSuper Nova II
60%BTTS - last 560%
MārupeSuper Nova II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
MārupeSuper Nova II
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
MārupeSuper Nova II
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
MārupeSuper Nova II

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
MārupeSuper Nova II
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
MārupeSuper Nova II
56%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
MārupeSuper Nova II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Mārupe · 1.69 pts / match - Super Nova II

Mārupe - half-time state
19% leading44% draw38% trailing
Super Nova II - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.69
MārupeSuper Nova II
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.69
MārupeSuper Nova II
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
MārupeSuper Nova II
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.31
MārupeSuper Nova II
56%Clean sheet before half-time75%
MārupeSuper Nova II
69%No goal before half-time44%
MārupeSuper Nova II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.19
MārupeSuper Nova II
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
MārupeSuper Nova II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
MārupeSuper Nova II
2.25Average goals (2nd half)1.56
MārupeSuper Nova II
38%Clean sheet after half-time31%
MārupeSuper Nova II
38%No goal after half-time50%
MārupeSuper Nova II

Mārupe - second-half results

38% W13% D50% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding232%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova II - second-half results

25% W44% D31% L
27
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mārupe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Super Nova II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

MārupeLigaSuper Nova II
Average goals in match▼ 3.193.58▼ 2.88
Both teams scored▼ 50%63%• 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%69%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 31%21%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%75%▼ 69%
Goal after half-time▲ 94%86%▼ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.58
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.98
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Super Nova IIAssistAram Baghdasaryan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mārupe 1 - 0 - 0 Super Nova II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mārupe vs Super Nova II?

The 1. Liga match finished Mārupe 2:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Super Nova II?

Mārupe score 1.63 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.44. The 1. Liga average is 3.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's matches and 63% of Super Nova II's.

What form are Mārupe and Super Nova II in?

Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Super Nova II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Super Nova II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.