Masar vs Dayrout: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Masar played Dayrout in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 17 December 2025. Final score: 6:0.

Current form

Masar: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Dayrout: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Masar scores 1.33 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Dayrout scores 0.60 and concedes 0.87. League average: 1.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Masar 33%, Dayrout 33%. Over 2.5: Masar 27%, Dayrout 13%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Masar has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.10. Masar: 7.3 shots per match, Dayrout: 5.7.

Match halves

Masar: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.67. Dayrout: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Masar: 76-90+ (6 goals). Dayrout: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
MasarDayrout
-1Shots-1
MasarDayrout
-1Shots on target-1
MasarDayrout
0xG0
MasarDayrout
-1Corners-1
MasarDayrout
0Dangerous attacks0
MasarDayrout
-1Fouls-1
MasarDayrout
-1Cards-1
MasarDayrout

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match0.6
MasarDayrout
0.67Goals conceded / match0.87
MasarDayrout
40%Average possession34%
MasarDayrout
2.93Shots on target / match1.8
MasarDayrout

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.27Shots per match5.67
MasarDayrout
2.93Shots on target1.8
MasarDayrout
18.3%Shot conversion10.6%
MasarDayrout
40%Possession34%
MasarDayrout
1.27xG for1.1
MasarDayrout
1.17xG against1.11
MasarDayrout

Shooting quality

Masar: Counter-attackingDayrout: Balanced
MasarDayrout
Accuracy (shots on target)40%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masar is 120% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Masar · 1 pts / match - Dayrout

Masar
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W33% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-3
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Dayrout
LDWLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 122% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Masar · 0.6 goals / match - Dayrout

Masar is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Masar · 0.87 goals / match - Dayrout

Masar scoring profile: strong

Masar scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Dayrout keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Dayrout scoring profile: mixed

Dayrout scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 matches).

20Goals scored (season)9
MasarDayrout
10Goals conceded (season)13
MasarDayrout
2Average goals in match1.47
MasarDayrout
9Goals scored (last 5)2
MasarDayrout
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
MasarDayrout

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal53%
MasarDayrout
33%2 goals7%
MasarDayrout
20%3 goals0%
MasarDayrout
13%4 goals0%
MasarDayrout

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal60%
MasarDayrout
13%2 goals20%
MasarDayrout
7%3 goals7%
MasarDayrout
0%4 goals0%
MasarDayrout

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
MasarDayrout
7%BTTS in both halves0%
MasarDayrout
27%Scored in both halves7%
MasarDayrout

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
MasarDayrout
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MasarDayrout
40%BTTS - last 50%
MasarDayrout

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
MasarDayrout
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
MasarDayrout
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
MasarDayrout

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
MasarDayrout
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
MasarDayrout
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MasarDayrout

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Masar · 0.93 pts / match - Dayrout

Masar - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing
Dayrout - half-time state
7% leading73% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)0.93
MasarDayrout
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.2
MasarDayrout
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
MasarDayrout
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.53
MasarDayrout
73%Clean sheet before half-time73%
MasarDayrout
53%No goal before half-time80%
MasarDayrout

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.2
MasarDayrout
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
MasarDayrout
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
MasarDayrout
1Average goals (2nd half)0.93
MasarDayrout
67%Clean sheet after half-time53%
MasarDayrout
60%No goal after half-time60%
MasarDayrout

Masar - second-half results

33% W40% D27% L
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dayrout - second-half results

27% W40% D33% L
14
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dayrout - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Masar
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Dayrout
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Dayrout

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MasarLigaDayrout
Average goals in match▲ 2.001.89▼ 1.47
Both teams scored▼ 33%40%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 27%30%▼ 13%
Clean sheets▲ 53%39%• 40%
Goal before half-time▲ 53%51%▼ 33%
Goal after half-time• 67%68%▲ 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.89
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defence advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Friday Mbeke Godwin⚽ 1
—Islam Salah⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MasarGoalFriday Mbeke Godwin
  2. MasarGoalIslam Salah

FAQ

What was the result of Masar vs Dayrout?

The Second Division match finished Masar 6:0 Dayrout. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Dayrout?

Masar score 1.33 goals per game on average and Dayrout 0.60. The Second Division average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Masar's matches and 33% of Dayrout's.

What form are Masar and Dayrout in?

Over the last 5 games Masar have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Dayrout 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Dayrout?

The statistical background for Masar vs Dayrout — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.