Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

Masar vs Tanta SC: match statistics

Masar crest
Masar
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Masar sits in 4th place in the table and has a clear advantage over Tanta SC (16th position). The hosts show solid defense at home with 50% clean sheets and an average of only 0.9 goals conceded per match. Tanta SC has very poor away form with just 9% wins and 55% draws, indicating difficulties in scoring goals on the road (average 0.64 goals). Despite Masar's weaker recent form (1 win in the last 5 matches), their home advantage and better offensive statistics (31 goals in the season vs 15 for Tanta) speak for a home victory. Tanta's high percentage of away draws (55%) and the defensive style of play of the visitors increase the probability of a point split, but Masar's quality should prevail.

Masar vs Tanta SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Masar play Tanta SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 12 February 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tanta SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Masar scores 1.38 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Tanta SC scores 0.79 and concedes 1.06. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Masar 38%, Tanta SC 53%. Over 2.5: Masar 32%, Tanta SC 24%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Masar has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.26. Masar: 8.7 shots per match, Tanta SC: 7.3.

Match halves

Masar: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71. Tanta SC: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

Masar: 76-90+ (12 goals). Tanta SC: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Masar sits in 4th place in the table and has a clear advantage over Tanta SC (16th position). The hosts show solid defense at home with 50% clean sheets and an average of only 0.9 goals conceded per match. Tanta SC has very poor away form with just 9% wins and 55% draws, indicating difficulties in scoring goals on the road (average 0.64 goals). Despite Masar's weaker recent form (1 win in the last 5 matches), their home advantage and better offensive statistics (31 goals in the season vs 15 for Tanta) speak for a home victory. Tanta's high percentage of away draws (55%) and the defensive style of play of the visitors increase the probability of a point split, but Masar's quality should prevail.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
MasarTanta SC
13Shots2
MasarTanta SC
2Shots on target0
MasarTanta SC
1.3xG0.42
MasarTanta SC
3Corners5
MasarTanta SC
46Dangerous attacks38
MasarTanta SC
13Fouls13
MasarTanta SC
0Cards0
MasarTanta SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match0.79
MasarTanta SC
0.85Goals conceded / match1.06
MasarTanta SC
48%Average possession46%
MasarTanta SC
3.41Shots on target / match3
MasarTanta SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.71Shots per match7.32
MasarTanta SC
3.41Shots on target3
MasarTanta SC
15.9%Shot conversion10.8%
MasarTanta SC
48%Possession46%
MasarTanta SC
1.3xG for1.26
MasarTanta SC
1.09xG against1.26
MasarTanta SC

Shooting quality

Masar: Efficient finishingTanta SC: Balanced
MasarTanta SC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masar is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Masar · 1.2 pts / match - Tanta SC

Masar
LWDLW
Season result split
44% W29% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-10-9
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-6-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Tanta SC
DLDWD
Season result split
15% W53% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-18-11
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-9-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Masar · 0.79 goals / match - Tanta SC

Masar is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - Masar · 1.06 goals / match - Tanta SC

Masar scoring profile: strong

Masar scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

Tanta SC scoring profile: mixed

Tanta SC scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).

47Goals scored (season)27
MasarTanta SC
29Goals conceded (season)36
MasarTanta SC
2.24Average goals in match1.85
MasarTanta SC
7Goals scored (last 5)8
MasarTanta SC
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
MasarTanta SC

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal59%
MasarTanta SC
38%2 goals12%
MasarTanta SC
18%3 goals6%
MasarTanta SC
12%4 goals3%
MasarTanta SC

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal76%
MasarTanta SC
21%2 goals21%
MasarTanta SC
3%3 goals6%
MasarTanta SC
0%4 goals3%
MasarTanta SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
MasarTanta SC
6%BTTS in both halves3%
MasarTanta SC
32%Scored in both halves9%
MasarTanta SC

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
MasarTanta SC
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
MasarTanta SC
20%BTTS - last 580%
MasarTanta SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
MasarTanta SC
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
MasarTanta SC
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MasarTanta SC

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
MasarTanta SC
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
MasarTanta SC
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
MasarTanta SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.65 pts / match - Masar · 1.21 pts / match - Tanta SC

Masar - half-time state
38% leading50% draw12% trailing
Tanta SC - half-time state
21% leading59% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per match (1st half)1.21
MasarTanta SC
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.44
MasarTanta SC
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
MasarTanta SC
0.91Average goals (1st half)0.85
MasarTanta SC
74%Clean sheet before half-time62%
MasarTanta SC
50%No goal before half-time62%
MasarTanta SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.97
MasarTanta SC
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
MasarTanta SC
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
MasarTanta SC
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1
MasarTanta SC
53%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MasarTanta SC
59%No goal after half-time71%
MasarTanta SC

Masar - second-half results

32% W32% R35% P
56
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanta SC - second-half results

18% W44% R38% P
41
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Masar
ScoredConceded
11
6
0-15
9
0
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
7
3
16-30
6
9
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
7
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MasarLigaTanta SC
Average goals in match 2.241.95 1.85
Both teams scored 38%41% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%32% 24%
Clean sheets 38%38% 24%
Goal before half-time 59%53% 59%
Goal after half-time 76%67% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Masar 1 - 0 - 0 Tanta SC. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tanta SC
0 : 2
Masar

FAQ

What was the result of Masar vs Tanta SC?

The Second Division match finished Masar 0:0 Tanta SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Tanta SC?

Masar score 1.38 goals per game on average and Tanta SC 0.79. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Masar's matches and 53% of Tanta SC's.

What form are Masar and Tanta SC in?

Over the last 5 games Masar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tanta SC 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Tanta SC?

The statistical background for Masar vs Tanta SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.