Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 12 September 2026

Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC: match statistics

Masar crest
Masar
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Telecom Egypt SC crest
Telecom Egypt SC

Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Masar played Telecom Egypt SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 14 May 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Telecom Egypt SC: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Masar scores 1.33 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Telecom Egypt SC scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Masar 39%, Telecom Egypt SC 39%. Over 2.5: Masar 30%, Telecom Egypt SC 39%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Masar has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.12. Masar: 8.8 shots per match, Telecom Egypt SC: 6.9.

Match halves

Masar: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.67. Telecom Egypt SC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Masar: 76-90+ (11 goals). Telecom Egypt SC: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Masar holds the form advantage over the last five matches: they scored 8 goals (1.6 per match) versus Telecom’s 2 goals (0.4 per match) and averaged 1.4 points compared to 0.6 for the visitors. Over the season Masar has netted 44 goals versus Telecom’s 30, and at home they average 1.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Telecom on the road scores 1.19 and concedes 1.19; additionally the home xG is 1.18 with xG against 0.91, whereas the away xG for Telecom is 1.23 with xG against 1.12, which points to a slightly more stable Masar defense. Telecom, however, is more efficient in finishing — averaging 3.54 shots on target away and a conversion rate of about 14% versus 2.86 and 8% for the hosts — so they are dangerous on the break. At the same time Masar posts higher home possession (60% vs 53%) and a superior season goal differential (44–30), but their home matches show significant offensive inconsistency — in 63% of home games the hosts failed to score, which raises the risk of a draw. Considering Masar’s better recent form and goal advantage and Telecom’s poor run (0 wins in the last 5), I expect a home win, albeit with a moderate probability of a shared point.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data show a divergence: Masar has a seasonal BTTS of 24% and keeps a clean sheet in 47% of matches, while Telecom Egypt SC has BTTS of 56% and averages 1.19 goals per match. Looking at xG, expected goals are about 1.03 for Masar and 1.23 for Telecom, but Masar significantly underperforms its chances (xG 1.03 vs actual 0.65 goals), which reduces the hosts' real chance of scoring. In the last 5 matches Masar scores 1.6 and concedes 1.2 on average, while Telecom scores only 0.4 and concedes 1.6, and both teams have 40% BTTS in their last 5, indicating a moderate probability of a mutual goal. Estimating the probability of scoring at least one goal: adjusted efficiency gives about 49% for Masar and 67% for Telecom, translating to roughly a 33% chance of BTTS; the stronger signal from the data (low seasonal BTTS 24% and 47% clean sheets for the hosts versus Telecom’s scoring issues in the last 5) favors No (67% vs 33%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I based expected goals on xG: Masar 1.08 (attacking xG 1.03 vs xG conceded by Telecom 1.12), Telecom 1.16 (attacking xG 1.23 vs xG conceded by Masar 1.08), total 2.24 — above the league average 1.94. A Poisson model with lambda=2.24 yields ~66% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~39% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~19% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Offensive metrics support this: Telecom averages 3.54 shots on target and a 14% conversion versus 2.69 and 9% for Masar, and both teams scored in 56% of Telecom’s matches vs 24% for Masar. At the same time Masar at home has 47% clean sheets and concedes only 0.71 goals seasonally, which limits the probability of a very high-scoring game and makes Over 2.5 (39%) and Over 3.5 (19%) weaker signals. In summary, the strongest and most value-driven signal is Over 1.5 (66%) — I recommend backing the Over 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (Masar leading at the break and winning), given the home side's form. Masar have won 40% of their last 5 matches (2 of 5), while Telecom have not recorded a win (0 of 5), and the hosts average 1.6 goals across those five games versus 0.4 for the visitors. Masar led at the break in 40% of their last 5 matches and average 2.0 goals in second halves over that span, while Telecom average 1.0. Telecom, however, have a seasonal xG of 1.23 versus Masar's 1.03 and a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs 9%), but the visitors’ poorer form (0% wins in 5) and Masar's higher share of clean sheets this season (47% of matches without conceding vs 25% for Telecom) favor the home victory. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario, with a caveat for a full-time draw (X/X) and a half-time draw with a home lead (1/X) as alternatives.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
4Shots8
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
4Shots on target5
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0.88xG1.16
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
3Corners4
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
46Dangerous attacks41
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
-1Fouls-1
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
-1Cards-1
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MasarTelecom Egypt SC
1.33Goals scored / match0.91
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0.88Goals conceded / match0.94
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
48%Average possession45%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
3.39Shots on target / match2.58
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.85Shots per match6.94
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
3.39Shots on target2.58
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
15.1%Shot conversion13.1%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
48%Possession45%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
1.32xG for1.12
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
1.09xG against1.1
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

Shooting quality

Masar: Efficient finishingTelecom Egypt SC: Counter-attacking
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
Accuracy (shots on target)38%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masar is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Masar · 0.6 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Masar
WLWDL
Season result split
42% W30% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-9
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-6-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Telecom Egypt SC
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W39% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-13-9
1.39 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-8-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 46% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Masar · 0.91 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Masar is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Masar · 0.94 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Masar scoring profile: strong

Masar scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

Telecom Egypt SC scoring profile: mixed

Telecom Egypt SC scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

44Goals scored (season)30
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
29Goals conceded (season)31
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
2.21Average goals in match1.85
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
8Goals scored (last 5)2
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal58%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
36%2 goals30%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
15%3 goals3%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
12%4 goals0%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal64%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
21%2 goals24%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
3%3 goals6%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0%4 goals0%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
Telecom Egypt SC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 33 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time6%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
6%BTTS in both halves3%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
30%Scored in both halves15%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
40%BTTS - last 540%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time6%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - Masar · 1.27 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC

Masar - half-time state
36% leading52% draw12% trailing
Telecom Egypt SC - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)1.27
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.33
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0.91Average goals (1st half)0.67
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
73%Clean sheet before half-time67%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
52%No goal before half-time67%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.24
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.18
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC
61%No goal after half-time61%
MasarTelecom Egypt SC

Masar - second-half results

30% W33% D36% L
53
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results

21% W61% D18% L
42
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Masar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Telecom Egypt SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Masar
ScoredConceded
10
6
0-15
9
0
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Telecom Egypt SC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
7
6
31-45
4
6
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Telecom Egypt SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MasarLigaTelecom Egypt SC
Average goals in match 2.211.95 1.85
Both teams scored 39%41% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%32% 39%
Clean sheets 36%38% 36%
Goal before half-time 58%53% 61%
Goal after half-time 76%68% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.93
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Masar 1 - 0 - 0 Telecom Egypt SC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC?

The Second Division match finished Masar 3:0 Telecom Egypt SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC?

Masar score 1.33 goals per game on average and Telecom Egypt SC 0.91. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Masar's matches and 39% of Telecom Egypt SC's.

What form are Masar and Telecom Egypt SC in?

Over the last 5 games Masar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Telecom Egypt SC 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC?

The statistical background for Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.