Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC: match statistics
Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Masar played Telecom Egypt SC in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 14 May 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Masar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Telecom Egypt SC: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Masar scores 1.33 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Telecom Egypt SC scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Masar 39%, Telecom Egypt SC 39%. Over 2.5: Masar 30%, Telecom Egypt SC 39%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Masar has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.12. Masar: 8.8 shots per match, Telecom Egypt SC: 6.9.
Match halves
Masar: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.67. Telecom Egypt SC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Masar: 76-90+ (11 goals). Telecom Egypt SC: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Masar holds the form advantage over the last five matches: they scored 8 goals (1.6 per match) versus Telecom’s 2 goals (0.4 per match) and averaged 1.4 points compared to 0.6 for the visitors. Over the season Masar has netted 44 goals versus Telecom’s 30, and at home they average 1.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Telecom on the road scores 1.19 and concedes 1.19; additionally the home xG is 1.18 with xG against 0.91, whereas the away xG for Telecom is 1.23 with xG against 1.12, which points to a slightly more stable Masar defense. Telecom, however, is more efficient in finishing — averaging 3.54 shots on target away and a conversion rate of about 14% versus 2.86 and 8% for the hosts — so they are dangerous on the break. At the same time Masar posts higher home possession (60% vs 53%) and a superior season goal differential (44–30), but their home matches show significant offensive inconsistency — in 63% of home games the hosts failed to score, which raises the risk of a draw. Considering Masar’s better recent form and goal advantage and Telecom’s poor run (0 wins in the last 5), I expect a home win, albeit with a moderate probability of a shared point.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data show a divergence: Masar has a seasonal BTTS of 24% and keeps a clean sheet in 47% of matches, while Telecom Egypt SC has BTTS of 56% and averages 1.19 goals per match. Looking at xG, expected goals are about 1.03 for Masar and 1.23 for Telecom, but Masar significantly underperforms its chances (xG 1.03 vs actual 0.65 goals), which reduces the hosts' real chance of scoring. In the last 5 matches Masar scores 1.6 and concedes 1.2 on average, while Telecom scores only 0.4 and concedes 1.6, and both teams have 40% BTTS in their last 5, indicating a moderate probability of a mutual goal. Estimating the probability of scoring at least one goal: adjusted efficiency gives about 49% for Masar and 67% for Telecom, translating to roughly a 33% chance of BTTS; the stronger signal from the data (low seasonal BTTS 24% and 47% clean sheets for the hosts versus Telecom’s scoring issues in the last 5) favors No (67% vs 33%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I based expected goals on xG: Masar 1.08 (attacking xG 1.03 vs xG conceded by Telecom 1.12), Telecom 1.16 (attacking xG 1.23 vs xG conceded by Masar 1.08), total 2.24 — above the league average 1.94. A Poisson model with lambda=2.24 yields ~66% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~39% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~19% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Offensive metrics support this: Telecom averages 3.54 shots on target and a 14% conversion versus 2.69 and 9% for Masar, and both teams scored in 56% of Telecom’s matches vs 24% for Masar. At the same time Masar at home has 47% clean sheets and concedes only 0.71 goals seasonally, which limits the probability of a very high-scoring game and makes Over 2.5 (39%) and Over 3.5 (19%) weaker signals. In summary, the strongest and most value-driven signal is Over 1.5 (66%) — I recommend backing the Over 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (Masar leading at the break and winning), given the home side's form. Masar have won 40% of their last 5 matches (2 of 5), while Telecom have not recorded a win (0 of 5), and the hosts average 1.6 goals across those five games versus 0.4 for the visitors. Masar led at the break in 40% of their last 5 matches and average 2.0 goals in second halves over that span, while Telecom average 1.0. Telecom, however, have a seasonal xG of 1.23 versus Masar's 1.03 and a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs 9%), but the visitors’ poorer form (0% wins in 5) and Masar's higher share of clean sheets this season (47% of matches without conceding vs 25% for Telecom) favor the home victory. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario, with a caveat for a full-time draw (X/X) and a half-time draw with a home lead (1/X) as alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Masar | Telecom Egypt SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Masar is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Masar · 0.6 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Masar is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Masar · 0.91 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC
Masar is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.88 goals / match - Masar · 0.94 goals / match - Telecom Egypt SC
Masar scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).
Telecom Egypt SC scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Masar
Over / Under - Telecom Egypt SC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Masar is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / match - Masar · 1.27 pts / match - Telecom Egypt SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Masar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Masar
Telecom Egypt SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Masar | Liga | Telecom Egypt SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.21 | 1.95 | • 1.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 41% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 32% | ▲ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 38% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 58% | 53% | ▲ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 68% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Masar 1 - 0 - 0 Telecom Egypt SC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC?
The Second Division match finished Masar 3:0 Telecom Egypt SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC?
Masar score 1.33 goals per game on average and Telecom Egypt SC 0.91. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Masar's matches and 39% of Telecom Egypt SC's.
What form are Masar and Telecom Egypt SC in?
Over the last 5 games Masar have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Telecom Egypt SC 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC?
The statistical background for Masar vs Telecom Egypt SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


