Mashujaa vs Tanzania Prisons: match statistics
Mashujaa vs Tanzania Prisons: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mashujaa played Tanzania Prisons in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 30 June 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Mashujaa: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Tanzania Prisons: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mashujaa scores 0.55 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Tanzania Prisons scores 0.76 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mashujaa 17%, Tanzania Prisons 34%. Over 2.5: Mashujaa 14%, Tanzania Prisons 41%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Mashujaa has higher xG: 1.37 vs 0.94. Mashujaa: 8.1 shots per match, Tanzania Prisons: 3.8.
Match halves
Mashujaa: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.24. Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Mashujaa: 31-45+ (6 goals). Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mashujaa are favourites in this fixture due to their defensive and territorial superiority: at home they concede just 0.5 goals per match on average and have a 71% clean sheet rate, whereas Tanzania Prisons concede 1.57 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in only 14% of away games. The hosts generate more chances — on average 9.75 shots (3.75 on target) and xG 1.42 at home versus 7.09 shots (2.73 on target) and xG 1.13 for the visitors — despite converting at a lower rate (around 7% compared to 10% for Prisons). It should be noted that the visitors are in strong recent form over the last 5 matches: 10 goals scored and 4 wins from 5, averaging 2.4 points per match versus the hosts’ 1.2 points. Considering Mashujaa’s solid defense and clear advantage in xG and shots, but also the visitors’ hot streak, I project a narrow Mashujaa victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS - Yes is the visitors' form: Tanzania Prisons have scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per game) and had BTTS in 80% of those games, conceding on average 1.4 goals. Mashujaa have scored only 3 goals in their last 5 matches (0.6 per game) and had BTTS 0%, but seasonally the home side keep a clean sheet in 40% of matches and concede 1.2 goals per game, showing they can shut opponents down. Additionally the visitors create significantly more chances: Tanzania Prisons average 7.09 shots and 2.73 on target per match with a season xG of 1.13 versus Mashujaa’s 3.17 shots, 1.17 on target and xG 0.79. Seasonal BTTS rates are 40% (Mashujaa) and 29% (Prisons) against a league level of 35%, so long-term the market is moderately low, but the short-term form of the visitors (80% BTTS in L5) is a strong counterargument. Taking this into account I forecast BTTS - Yes as more likely (approx. 60% vs 40%) because the visitors’ attacking and defensively vulnerable form (10 goals scored and 1.4 conceded in L5) outweighs Mashujaa’s moderate ability to keep a clean sheet (40% seasonal CS).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals as the average of the attack xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: Mashujaa xG_for 0.79 and xG_against_Tanzania 1.57 yield 1.18 expected goals for the home side, while Tanzania Prisons xG_for 1.13 and xG_against_Mashujaa 1.10 yield 1.12 for the away side (total 2.30). From a Poisson distribution for a total of 2.30, the probabilities are: Over 1.5 ≈67% (P(total≤1)=33%), Over 2.5 ≈40% (P(total≤2)=60%), and Over 3.5 ≈20% (P(total≤3)=80%). Season statistics support a moderately higher goal count: Mashujaa have over1.5 in 53% of matches, Tanzania Prisons in 57%, and in their last 5 games Tanzania average 2.0 goals and had over2.5 in 80% of matches. Additionally, Tanzania averages 7.09 shots (2.73 on target) with a 10% conversion rate, while Mashujaa average 3.17 shots (1.17 on target) with a 26% conversion, which suggests the visitors create more opportunities and increases the probability of at least 2 goals in the game. Based on this, the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5, because the total xG=2.30 together with recent shooting form gives the highest probability of that line being hit.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data analysis indicates the most reliable scenario is the away team leading at half-time and winning at full-time (2/2). Tanzania Prisons have an 80% win rate in their last 5 matches (4 of 5) and were leading at the break in 60% of those fixtures (3 of 5), while Mashujaa won 40% of their last 5 matches (2 of 5) and led at the break in only 20% (1 of 5). The visitors create more chances: average xG 1.13 versus the hosts’ 0.79 and 7.09 shots per match versus 3.17, and over the last 5 matches they averaged 0.8 goals by half-time compared to the hosts’ 0.4. Although the home side has a higher seasonal shot conversion rate (26% vs 10%), the visitors’ superiority in chance volume and their second-half effectiveness (an average of 1.2 goals scored in the second half across the last 5 matches) support the maintenance of the visitors’ lead. Therefore I assign 42% to 2/2 as the strongest signal, with an alternative 28% for a half-time draw and away win (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mashujaa | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.19 | 0.58 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tanzania Prisons is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Mashujaa · 2.4 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tanzania Prisons is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
0.55 goals / match - Mashujaa · 0.76 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Mashujaa is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.86 goals / match - Mashujaa · 1.38 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Mashujaa scores in 41% of matches (12 of 29 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
Tanzania Prisons scores in 48% of matches (14 of 29 matches), while Mashujaa keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mashujaa
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mashujaa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mashujaa
Tanzania Prisons
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mashujaa | Liga | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.41 | 2.17 | • 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 17% | 35% | • 34% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 14% | 39% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 39% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 61% | • 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 41% | 63% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mashujaa 0 - 1 - 0 Tanzania Prisons. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mashujaa vs Tanzania Prisons?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mashujaa 0:1 Tanzania Prisons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mashujaa vs Tanzania Prisons?
Mashujaa score 0.55 goals per game on average and Tanzania Prisons 0.76. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Mashujaa's matches and 34% of Tanzania Prisons's.
What form are Mashujaa and Tanzania Prisons in?
Over the last 5 games Mashujaa have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Tanzania Prisons 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mashujaa vs Tanzania Prisons?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


