Mashujaa vs Young Africans: match statistics
Mashujaa vs Young Africans: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mashujaa played Young Africans in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 13 June 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Mashujaa: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Young Africans: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mashujaa scores 0.52 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. Young Africans scores 2.38 and concedes 0.38. League average: 2.13 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mashujaa 20%, Young Africans 25%. Over 2.5: Mashujaa 16%, Young Africans 58%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Young Africans has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.37. Mashujaa: 8.2 shots per match, Young Africans: 10.8.
Match halves
Mashujaa: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.24. Young Africans: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Mashujaa: 31-45+ (4 goals). Young Africans: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.13 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Young Africans are top of the table (1st) with 17 wins and 57 goals scored this season, while Mashujaa sit 9th with 6 wins and only 13 goals, giving the visitors a 44-goal advantage. In their last 5 matches Young Africans have scored 12 goals and won 4 (4-0-1) averaging 2.4 points per game, whereas Mashujaa have 2 goals and 1 win (1-2-2) with an average of 1 point per game. Visitors average 12.6 shots (5.7 on target) per away match versus the hosts' 10 shots (3.6 on target), and the visitors’ xG is 1.85 compared to Mashujaa’s 1.44, confirming better quality chances. Mashujaa do, however, show solid home defensive metrics: just 0.42 goals conceded per game and 75% clean sheets, but their average xG against is 1.52, suggesting the defense benefited from opponents’ low finishing. Considering the large goal difference (57 vs 13), higher xG and greater number of shots on target for Young Africans and better form (4 wins in last 5), I predict an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators strongly favor No BTTS: seasonal BTTS are 23% for Mashujaa and 27% for Young Africans, and only 36% of league matches end with both teams scoring. Very high clean sheet rates — 77% for Mashujaa and 73% for Young Africans, and league CS 79% — indicate matches often finish with at least one clean sheet. Although Young Africans have scored 57 goals this season and 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 goals per game), Mashujaa has a higher shot conversion rate 26% vs 10% for the opponent and xG 1.9 vs 1.85, which can lead to one-sided results. Additionally 54% of Mashujaa’s home games are over2.5 without BTTS, and in the last 5 matches Mashujaa averaged 0.4 goals vs 2.4 for Young Africans, so results where only one team scores are more likely. Based on this I recommend 'No' (No BTTS) with a probability of 70% vs 30% for 'Yes', because the predominance of clean sheet signals and low seasonal BTTS (23%/27%/36%) outweighs Young Africans’ recent scoring run.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model indicates a total expected goals figure of approximately 2.85: base xG for Mashujaa is calculated as (1.90 + 1.06)/2 = 1.48, for Young Africans as (1.85 + 0.89)/2 = 1.37. Given Mashujaa’s much higher shot conversion (26% vs 10% for Young Africans) I adjusted the forecasts to 1.55 goals for Mashujaa and 1.30 for Young Africans, totaling 2.85. Seasonally Mashujaa at home have 92% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Young Africans 45%, and the league averages 2.14 goals per match; this strongly supports Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, a Poisson model with mean 2.85 gives probability of Over 2.5 goals around 54%, and additionally Mashujaa have 77% of home matches with over 2.5 goals while Young Africans show 80% of such matches in the last 5 fixtures, so I raised the Over 2.5 probability to 58%. For the 3.5 line Poisson yields probability of Over 3.5 goals around 32%, and seasonal rates 46% (Mashujaa) vs 18% (Young Africans) confirm moderate potential for a very high-scoring game — therefore I assess Over 3.5 at 31%. Consequently the strongest and least risky signal is Over 1.5 (selection: over 1.5) with a high probability of 90%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Mashujaa demonstrate dominance at home: they score an average of 3.31 goals per match and concede only 0.23, winning 92% of home games (11 of 12) and holding a lead at the break in 7 of 12 matches (58%). At half-time the hosts average 1.42 goals versus 0.73 for Young Africans, and Mashujaa’s shot conversion rate is 26% compared to the visitors’ 10%, underscoring the hosts’ high efficiency in converting chances. Young Africans have been in good recent form (4 wins in 5, 80% and leading at the break in 60% of their last 5), but seasonally they score only 1.27 goals away and more often concede xG (expected goals against 1.06 versus 0.89 against Mashujaa). The teams’ xG is similar (1.90 vs 1.85), but Mashujaa’s defensive edge and their ability to score both before and after the break support a scenario of a half-time lead and an eventual home win, hence 1/1 is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mashujaa | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.19 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Young Africans is 140% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Mashujaa · 2.4 pts / match - Young Africans
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Africans is 358% better for: goals scored per match.
0.52 goals / match - Mashujaa · 2.38 goals / match - Young Africans
Young Africans is 121% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.84 goals / match - Mashujaa · 0.38 goals / match - Young Africans
Mashujaa scores in 40% of matches (10 of 25 matches), while Young Africans keeps a clean sheet in 75% (18 of 24 matches).
Young Africans scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Mashujaa keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mashujaa
Over / Under - Young Africans
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Young Africans is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Mashujaa · 1.88 pts / match - Young Africans
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mashujaa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Young Africans - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mashujaa
Young Africans
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mashujaa | Liga | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.36 | 2.13 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 35% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 16% | 38% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 39% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 40% | 62% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Young AfricansGoalMudathiri YahyaAssist: Prince Dube
- Young AfricansGoalBakari Nondo
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mashujaa 0 - 0 - 1 Young Africans. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mashujaa vs Young Africans?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mashujaa 0:2 Young Africans. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mashujaa vs Young Africans?
Mashujaa score 0.52 goals per game on average and Young Africans 2.38. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Mashujaa's matches and 25% of Young Africans's.
What form are Mashujaa and Young Africans in?
Over the last 5 games Mashujaa have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Young Africans 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mashujaa vs Young Africans?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mashujaa vs Young Africans: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


