Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 11 September 2026

Masr vs Coca-Cola: match statistics

Masr crest
Masr
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Coca-Cola crest
Coca-Cola
135%(2.45)
X40%(2.70)
225%(2.90)

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced matchup with a draw being the most favorable scenario. Masr presents a stable home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% defeats, averaging 0.89 goals per match. Coca-Cola struggles in away matches, scoring an average of only 0.78 goals and conceding 1.22 goals, alongside a high rate of 56% of matches without scoring. The recent form of both teams is very poor - Masr has earned just 0.8 points per game in their last five fixtures (4 draws, 1 defeat), while Coca-Cola performed even worse with 0.6 points. Considering the low offensive output of both teams, their tendency to draw, and poor form in recent weeks, sharing the points is the most likely outcome.

Masr vs Coca-Cola: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Masr played Coca-Cola in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 11 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Masr: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Coca-Cola: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Masr scores 1.00 and concedes 0.84 goals per match. Coca-Cola scores 0.95 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Masr 53%, Coca-Cola 58%. Over 2.5: Masr 26%, Coca-Cola 42%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Masr has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.18. Masr: 10.5 shots per match, Coca-Cola: 9.8.

Match halves

Masr: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.42. Coca-Cola: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Masr: 31-45+ (6 goals). Coca-Cola: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced matchup with a draw being the most favorable scenario. Masr presents a stable home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% defeats, averaging 0.89 goals per match. Coca-Cola struggles in away matches, scoring an average of only 0.78 goals and conceding 1.22 goals, alongside a high rate of 56% of matches without scoring. The recent form of both teams is very poor - Masr has earned just 0.8 points per game in their last five fixtures (4 draws, 1 defeat), while Coca-Cola performed even worse with 0.6 points. Considering the low offensive output of both teams, their tendency to draw, and poor form in recent weeks, sharing the points is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
MasrCoca-Cola
16Shots11
MasrCoca-Cola
7Shots on target2
MasrCoca-Cola
1.82xG1.23
MasrCoca-Cola
3Corners2
MasrCoca-Cola
44Dangerous attacks54
MasrCoca-Cola
12Fouls15
MasrCoca-Cola
1Cards1
MasrCoca-Cola

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.95
MasrCoca-Cola
0.84Goals conceded / match1.16
MasrCoca-Cola
50%Average possession48%
MasrCoca-Cola
4.21Shots on target / match3
MasrCoca-Cola

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.47Shots per match9.79
MasrCoca-Cola
4.21Shots on target3
MasrCoca-Cola
9.5%Shot conversion9.7%
MasrCoca-Cola
50%Possession48%
MasrCoca-Cola
1.25xG for1.18
MasrCoca-Cola
1.4xG against1.23
MasrCoca-Cola

Shooting quality

Masr: BalancedCoca-Cola: Balanced
MasrCoca-Cola
Accuracy (shots on target)40%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Masr is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Masr · 0.6 pts / match - Coca-Cola

Masr
WDDLD
Season result split
32% W42% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-5
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Coca-Cola
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
26% W42% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-6
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masr is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Masr · 0.95 goals / match - Coca-Cola

Masr is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.84 goals / match - Masr · 1.16 goals / match - Coca-Cola

Masr scoring profile: very strong

Masr scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

Coca-Cola scoring profile: strong

Coca-Cola scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while Masr keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

19Goals scored (season)18
MasrCoca-Cola
16Goals conceded (season)22
MasrCoca-Cola
1.84Average goals in match2.11
MasrCoca-Cola
5Goals scored (last 5)3
MasrCoca-Cola
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
MasrCoca-Cola

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal68%
MasrCoca-Cola
26%2 goals26%
MasrCoca-Cola
0%3 goals0%
MasrCoca-Cola
0%4 goals0%
MasrCoca-Cola

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal79%
MasrCoca-Cola
16%2 goals32%
MasrCoca-Cola
0%3 goals5%
MasrCoca-Cola
0%4 goals0%
MasrCoca-Cola

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time0%
MasrCoca-Cola
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MasrCoca-Cola
26%Scored in both halves11%
MasrCoca-Cola

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
MasrCoca-Cola
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
MasrCoca-Cola
60%BTTS - last 560%
MasrCoca-Cola

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
MasrCoca-Cola
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
MasrCoca-Cola
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MasrCoca-Cola

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
MasrCoca-Cola
16%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
MasrCoca-Cola
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
MasrCoca-Cola

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masr is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Masr · 1.32 pts / match - Coca-Cola

Masr - half-time state
32% leading47% draw21% trailing
Coca-Cola - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.32
MasrCoca-Cola
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.32
MasrCoca-Cola
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
MasrCoca-Cola
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.58
MasrCoca-Cola
58%Clean sheet before half-time79%
MasrCoca-Cola
42%No goal before half-time74%
MasrCoca-Cola

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)0.89
MasrCoca-Cola
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
MasrCoca-Cola
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
MasrCoca-Cola
0.79Average goals (2nd half)1.53
MasrCoca-Cola
63%Clean sheet after half-time26%
MasrCoca-Cola
58%No goal after half-time47%
MasrCoca-Cola

Masr - second-half results

26% W53% D21% L
27
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Coca-Cola - second-half results

11% W58% D32% L
25
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Masr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Coca-Cola - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Masr
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
6
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
4
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Coca-Cola
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
6
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Masr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Coca-Cola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

MasrLigaCoca-Cola
Average goals in match 1.842.02 2.11
Both teams scored 53%47% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%34% 42%
Clean sheets 32%34% 21%
Goal before half-time 74%58% 47%
Goal after half-time 63%71% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MasrYellow cardAhmed Tarek
  2. Coca-ColaYellow cardEmad Hamdi
  3. MasrGoalAhmed AdelAssist: Ahmet Atef
  4. Coca-ColaSubstitutionOn: Abdel Rahman OsamaOff: Ghanam Mohamed

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mahmoud BassiouniMatches officiated: 12
4.83Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 225%Home wins50%Draws25%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Masr vs Coca-Cola?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Masr 2:0 Coca-Cola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masr vs Coca-Cola?

Masr score 1.00 goals per game on average and Coca-Cola 0.95. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Masr's matches and 58% of Coca-Cola's.

What form are Masr and Coca-Cola in?

Over the last 5 games Masr have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Coca-Cola 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masr vs Coca-Cola?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.