Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Mathare United vs Tusker: match statistics

Mathare United crest
Mathare United
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Tusker crest
Tusker
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Tusker presents decidedly better form than Mathare United, confirmed by the record of the last five matches – 4 victories for the guests against just 2 wins for the hosts. Mathare United has a dismal home record with 67% losses and only 33% wins, while Tusker demonstrates impressive efficiency away with 63% wins and 63% clean sheets. The difference in average goals conceded is distinct – Mathare concedes an average of 1.17 goals at home, while Tusker concedes only 0.5 away. Additionally, Tusker has a positive goal difference (+4) in away matches, whereas the hosts have a negative one (-2) in home games. The guests' form (wwwlw) and the hosts' weakness (wldwl) point to an advantage for Tusker, who should secure the full three points in this clash.

Mathare United vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mathare United played Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 6 February 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Mathare United: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Tusker: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mathare United scores 0.63 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Tusker scores 0.89 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mathare United 26%, Tusker 42%. Over 2.5: Mathare United 16%, Tusker 32%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Mathare United has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.52. Mathare United: 12.8 shots per match, Tusker: 11.9.

Match halves

Mathare United: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.21. Tusker: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.32.

Goals by minute

Mathare United: 0-15 (6 goals). Tusker: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tusker presents decidedly better form than Mathare United, confirmed by the record of the last five matches – 4 victories for the guests against just 2 wins for the hosts. Mathare United has a dismal home record with 67% losses and only 33% wins, while Tusker demonstrates impressive efficiency away with 63% wins and 63% clean sheets. The difference in average goals conceded is distinct – Mathare concedes an average of 1.17 goals at home, while Tusker concedes only 0.5 away. Additionally, Tusker has a positive goal difference (+4) in away matches, whereas the hosts have a negative one (-2) in home games. The guests' form (wwwlw) and the hosts' weakness (wldwl) point to an advantage for Tusker, who should secure the full three points in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Mathare UnitedTusker
7Shots8
Mathare UnitedTusker
3Shots on target3
Mathare UnitedTusker
1.11xG1.23
Mathare UnitedTusker
2Corners7
Mathare UnitedTusker
61Dangerous attacks70
Mathare UnitedTusker
-1Fouls-1
Mathare UnitedTusker
-1Cards-1
Mathare UnitedTusker

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mathare UnitedTusker
0.63Goals scored / match0.89
Mathare UnitedTusker
0.89Goals conceded / match1
Mathare UnitedTusker
52%Average possession50%
Mathare UnitedTusker
3.37Shots on target / match4.05
Mathare UnitedTusker

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.84Shots per match11.89
Mathare UnitedTusker
3.37Shots on target4.05
Mathare UnitedTusker
4.9%Shot conversion7.5%
Mathare UnitedTusker
52%Possession50%
Mathare UnitedTusker
1.59xG for1.52
Mathare UnitedTusker
1.5xG against1.41
Mathare UnitedTusker

Shooting quality

Mathare United: BalancedTusker: Balanced
Mathare UnitedTusker
Accuracy (shots on target)26%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tusker is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Mathare United · 1.4 pts / match - Tusker

Mathare United
LLWDL
Season result split
32% W21% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-9
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Tusker
WLLWD
Season result split
42% W21% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 away
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tusker is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

0.63 goals / match - Mathare United · 0.89 goals / match - Tusker

Mathare United is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - Mathare United · 1 goals / match - Tusker

Mathare United scoring profile: mixed

Mathare United scores in 58% of matches (11 of 19 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Mathare United keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

12Goals scored (season)17
Mathare UnitedTusker
17Goals conceded (season)19
Mathare UnitedTusker
1.53Average goals in match1.89
Mathare UnitedTusker
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Mathare UnitedTusker
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Mathare UnitedTusker

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal74%
Mathare UnitedTusker
5%2 goals16%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%3 goals0%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%4 goals0%
Mathare UnitedTusker

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal63%
Mathare UnitedTusker
32%2 goals26%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%3 goals5%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%4 goals5%
Mathare UnitedTusker

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time5%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%Scored in both halves5%
Mathare UnitedTusker

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Mathare UnitedTusker
40%BTTS - last 560%
Mathare UnitedTusker

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

26%Min. 1 goal before half-time42%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Mathare UnitedTusker

2nd half

37%Min. 1 goal after half-time32%
Mathare UnitedTusker
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time11%
Mathare UnitedTusker
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Mathare UnitedTusker

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mathare United - half-time state
11% leading74% draw16% trailing
Tusker - half-time state
16% leading58% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.05
Mathare UnitedTusker
0.11Goals scored (1st half)0.21
Mathare UnitedTusker
0.16Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Mathare UnitedTusker
0.26Average goals (1st half)0.63
Mathare UnitedTusker
84%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Mathare UnitedTusker
89%No goal before half-time79%
Mathare UnitedTusker

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Mathare UnitedTusker
0.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
Mathare UnitedTusker
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.11
Mathare UnitedTusker
0.68Average goals (2nd half)0.42
Mathare UnitedTusker
68%Clean sheet after half-time89%
Mathare UnitedTusker
84%No goal after half-time68%
Mathare UnitedTusker

Mathare United - second-half results

5% W74% R21% P
20
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding291%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tusker - second-half results

21% W79% R0% P
20
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding263%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mathare United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.2
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mathare United
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
0
3
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
8
12
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mathare United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.96
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mathare UnitedLigaTusker
Average goals in match 1.531.99 1.89
Both teams scored 26%43% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 16%33% 32%
Clean sheets 42%36% 37%
Goal before half-time 26%29% 42%
Goal after half-time 37%32% 32%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.99
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
0.96
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+-7%
Home attack advantage
+-7%
Home defence advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
29%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
32%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mathare United 0 - 1 - 0 Tusker. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Tusker
0 : 0
Mathare United

FAQ

What was the result of Mathare United vs Tusker?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Mathare United 3:1 Tusker. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mathare United vs Tusker?

Mathare United score 0.63 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.89. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Mathare United's matches and 42% of Tusker's.

What form are Mathare United and Tusker in?

Over the last 5 games Mathare United have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tusker 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mathare United vs Tusker?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.