Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraSokoine StadiumData current as of 15 October 2026

Mbeya City vs Kagera Sugar: match statistics

Mbeya City crest
Mbeya City
1 : 3half-time 1:1
Kagera Sugar crest
Kagera Sugar

Mbeya City vs Kagera Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mbeya City played Kagera Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 9 October 2026. Venue: Sokoine Stadium. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Mbeya City: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Kagera Sugar: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mbeya City scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Kagera Sugar scores 0.83 and concedes 2.33. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mbeya City 17%, Kagera Sugar 67%. Over 2.5: Mbeya City 17%, Kagera Sugar 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Kagera Sugar has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.45. Mbeya City: 8.2 shots per match, Kagera Sugar: 7.8.

Match halves

Mbeya City: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Kagera Sugar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Mbeya City: 76-90+ (3 goals). Kagera Sugar: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Mbeya City sit 5th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while 15th-placed Kagera Sugar have failed to win during that span. The hosts’ advantage is particularly evident defensively: they concede an average of 0.67 goals at home, whereas the visitors concede as many as 4 goals per away match and have lost both of those fixtures. Mbeya City have won 2 of their 3 home games, scoring an average of 1.33 goals, which, combined with their opponents’ defensive struggles away from home, points to another victory. Kagera can still create chances, however—their away xG is 1.74 compared with 1.32 for the hosts—so a clean sheet is far from guaranteed. Ultimately, the difference in results and goals conceded tips the balance in Mbeya City’s favour.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal in favour of both teams scoring comes from Kagera Sugar: they have scored in every away match but have yet to keep a clean sheet, with away BTTS at 100%. Mbeya City have also failed to keep a clean sheet at home, giving the visitors a genuine chance to extend their scoring run, particularly with an average xG of 1.74 compared with the 1.61 xG conceded by the hosts. The greater uncertainty is whether Mbeya City will score: they average just 0.5 goals at home and have failed to score in 50% of those matches. However, Kagera concede an average of 4.0 goals away from home and have shipped 12 in total across their last five matches, significantly increasing the likelihood of a goal from the hosts. Although the league BTTS rate is 47%, the visitors' defensive frailty and neither side having kept a clean sheet tip the assessment towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been surpassed in 100% of Mbeya City’s home matches and Kagera Sugar’s away matches so far. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.29 xG at home, while the visitors allow opponents 1.61 xG and have conceded an average of 4.0 goals away, supporting the case for a Mbeya City goal. Kagera Sugar generate 1.74 xG away and average 6.5 shots on target, although Mbeya City have conceded just 0.6 goals per match across their last five games. A forecast of 2.75 total goals also favors Over 2.5, but the contrast between 0% of such matches for the hosts and 100% for the visitors makes Over 1.5 the safer pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Mbeya City were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, and kept a clean sheet in the first half in 4 of them, which supports a draw at the break. However, this is not a certain scenario: Kagera Sugar led at the break in 2 of their last 5 matches. Recent results after the interval clearly favor the hosts — Mbeya averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.2 conceded, while Kagera averaged 0.2 scored and 1.2 conceded. Mbeya won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Kagera won none, so I consider a half-time draw followed by a home win at full-time the most likely outcome. However, the visitors’ higher xG, 1.74 compared with the hosts’ 1.29, means this HT/FT lean is not decisive.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
4Shots7
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
1Shots on target4
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0.75xG1.1
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
2Corners4
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
58Dangerous attacks51
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
15Fouls14
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0Cards0
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
1Goals scored / match0.83
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0.67Goals conceded / match2.33
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
50%Average possession49%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
2.33Shots on target / match3.67
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.17Shots per match7.83
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
2.33Shots on target3.67
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
12.2%Shot conversion10.6%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
50%Possession49%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
1.45xG for1.47
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
1.39xG against1.61
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

Shooting quality

Mbeya City: BalancedKagera Sugar: Balanced
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)29%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mbeya City is 400% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Mbeya City · 0.4 pts / match - Kagera Sugar

Mbeya City
WWWDL
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Kagera Sugar
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-4
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mbeya City is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Mbeya City · 0.83 goals / match - Kagera Sugar

Mbeya City is 248% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Mbeya City · 2.33 goals / match - Kagera Sugar

Mbeya City scoring profile: very strong

Mbeya City scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Kagera Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

Kagera Sugar scoring profile: mixed

Kagera Sugar scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

6Goals scored (season)5
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
4Goals conceded (season)14
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
1.67Average goals in match3.17
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
6Goals scored (last 5)5
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
3Goals conceded (last 5)12
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
50%2 goals17%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0%3 goals0%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0%4 goals0%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
17%2 goals67%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0%3 goals17%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0%4 goals17%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves17%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
17%Scored in both halves17%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
20%BTTS - last 580%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kagera Sugar is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Mbeya City · 1.17 pts / match - Kagera Sugar

Mbeya City - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Kagera Sugar - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.17
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1.17
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.83
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
83%No goal before half-time33%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0.33
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
1Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
83%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar
50%No goal after half-time83%
Mbeya CityKagera Sugar

Mbeya City - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kagera Sugar - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mbeya City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kagera Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mbeya City
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Kagera Sugar
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mbeya City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Kagera Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Mbeya CityLigaKagera Sugar
Average goals in match▼ 1.672.49▲ 3.17
Both teams scored▼ 17%47%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%43%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 50%27%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%74%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%72%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Starting lineup

10Emmanuel Mvuyekure⚽ 1

Substitutes

3Charles Luhendeon 1'

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kagera SugarGoalEmmanuel Mvuyekure

FAQ

What was the result of Mbeya City vs Kagera Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mbeya City 1:3 Kagera Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mbeya City vs Kagera Sugar?

Mbeya City score 1.00 goals per game on average and Kagera Sugar 0.83. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Mbeya City's matches and 67% of Kagera Sugar's.

What form are Mbeya City and Kagera Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Mbeya City have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kagera Sugar 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mbeya City vs Kagera Sugar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.