Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraSokoine StadiumData current as of 20 September 2026

Mbeya City vs Simba: match statistics

Mbeya City crest
Mbeya City
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Simba crest
Simba

Mbeya City vs Simba: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mbeya City played Simba in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 17 June 2026. Venue: Sokoine Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Mbeya City: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Simba: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mbeya City scores 0.77 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Simba scores 1.80 and concedes 0.44. League average: 2.14 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mbeya City 35%, Simba 32%. Over 2.5: Mbeya City 35%, Simba 52%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Simba has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.01. Mbeya City: 4.7 shots per match, Simba: 9.6.

Match halves

Mbeya City: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.31. Simba: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Mbeya City: 16-30 (6 goals). Simba: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Simba is the clear favorite: they average 1.5 goals away with an average xG of 1.63, while Mbeya City at home records only 0.69 goals and xG 0.95. Defensively Simba also has the edge — they concede 0.42 goals on average away and keep clean sheets in 58% of matches, whereas Mbeya concedes 1.23 goals at home and keeps clean sheets in 31% of cases. The form gap is decisive: Simba have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 12 goals in that period, translating to an average of 3.0 points per game, while Mbeya have 1 win, 3 goals and only 0.8 points per game in their last 5. Simba create significantly more chances — 10.6 shots with 4.3 on target away versus 4.92 shots and 1.33 on target for Mbeya; with a similar 14% conversion this implies a larger number of real scoring opportunities for Simba. Considering the xG advantage (1.63 vs 0.95), defensive stability (0.42 vs 1.23) and more frequent goal scoring (1.5 vs 0.69), I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict No BTTS, as Mbeya City has a season BTTS rate of only 23% versus Simba’s 42% and the league level at 36%, indicating a lower propensity for both teams to score. Both teams register high clean sheet rates: Mbeya City 69% and Simba 58%, while the league clean sheet share is as high as 78%, which further favors a No Goal scenario. Season average goals conceded are very low — 0.46 for the home side and 0.42 for the visitors — although in the last 5 matches Mbeya conceded on average 1.6 goals and Simba only 0.4. Simba has been strong offensively recently (12 goals in the last 5 matches, 2.4 avg; xG in the last 5 matches 2.13 vs the home side’s 1.08), but Mbeya scored only 3 goals (0.6) in that period, so defensive edge and the low season BTTS lead me to choose ‘No’.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: Mbeya’s offensive xG is 1.71 while Simba concedes 1.05 xG on average, so Mbeya’s expected goals ≈ (1.71+1.05)/2 = 1.38. Simba’s offensive xG is 1.63 versus 0.78 xG conceded by Mbeya, so Simba’s expected goals ≈ 1.21; total expected = 2.59 goals. Seasonal figures support an open contest — Mbeya scores 2.08 goals/match at home on average, Simba scores 1.50 away, and Over1.5 occurs in 85% of Mbeya’s matches and 67% of Simba’s. For the 2.5 line signals are moderately in favor of Over: Mbeya at home has Over2.5 in 54% of matches, Simba away 50%, and in the last 5 matches Simba has Over2.5 in 80% (Mbeya 20%), therefore I recommend Over 2.5 with an edge of about 60%. Over3.5 is unlikely season-wide (15% and 8%) and the combined expected xG of 2.59 is well below 3.5, so Under3.5 looks considerably weaker as a pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Mbeya City has very strong first-half statistics: they led at the break in 69% of matches and scored an average of 1.23 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.15, whereas Simba averages 0.83 goals by half-time and concedes 0.33. Across the season the hosts win 77% of matches versus Simba’s 58% away win rate and average 2.08 goals per game compared to 1.50 for their opponents, which supports maintaining the lead. Simba, however, is in form — they have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100%) and led at the break in 60% of those games, so there is a realistic chance of a turnaround after the interval. Nonetheless, Simba very rarely concedes after the break (on average 0.08 goals conceded in the second half), and Mbeya scores at least one goal after the break in 92% of their matches; therefore the strongest signal is Mbeya leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Mbeya CitySimba
5Shots3
Mbeya CitySimba
0Shots on target1
Mbeya CitySimba
0.64xG0.78
Mbeya CitySimba
1Corners5
Mbeya CitySimba
44Dangerous attacks72
Mbeya CitySimba
14Fouls5
Mbeya CitySimba
0Cards0
Mbeya CitySimba

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.77Goals scored / match1.8
Mbeya CitySimba
1.5Goals conceded / match0.44
Mbeya CitySimba
41%Average possession51%
Mbeya CitySimba
1.5Shots on target / match3.84
Mbeya CitySimba

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.69Shots per match9.64
Mbeya CitySimba
1.5Shots on target3.84
Mbeya CitySimba
16.4%Shot conversion18.7%
Mbeya CitySimba
41%Possession51%
Mbeya CitySimba
1.01xG for1.67
Mbeya CitySimba
1.41xG against0.9
Mbeya CitySimba

Shooting quality

Mbeya City: Counter-attackingSimba: Efficient finishing
Mbeya CitySimba
Accuracy (shots on target)32%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.510.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Simba is 275% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Mbeya City · 3 pts / match - Simba

Mbeya City
LLDLW
Season result split
23% W27% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-13
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Simba
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
68% W28% D4% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-7-1
2.32 pts / match · goal difference +34
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-5-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 2.13Opponent xG: 0.83BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Simba is 134% better for: goals scored per match.

0.77 goals / match - Mbeya City · 1.8 goals / match - Simba

Simba is 241% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Mbeya City · 0.44 goals / match - Simba

Mbeya City scoring profile: more difficult

Mbeya City scores in 50% of matches (13 of 26 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 64% (16 of 25 matches).

Simba scoring profile: very strong

Simba scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

20Goals scored (season)45
Mbeya CitySimba
39Goals conceded (season)11
Mbeya CitySimba
2.27Average goals in match2.24
Mbeya CitySimba
3Goals scored (last 5)12
Mbeya CitySimba
8Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mbeya CitySimba

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal80%
Mbeya CitySimba
19%2 goals64%
Mbeya CitySimba
8%3 goals32%
Mbeya CitySimba
0%4 goals4%
Mbeya CitySimba

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal36%
Mbeya CitySimba
42%2 goals8%
Mbeya CitySimba
15%3 goals0%
Mbeya CitySimba
12%4 goals0%
Mbeya CitySimba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time24%
Mbeya CitySimba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mbeya CitySimba
15%Scored in both halves44%
Mbeya CitySimba

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Mbeya CitySimba
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS28%
Mbeya CitySimba
40%BTTS - last 540%
Mbeya CitySimba

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Mbeya CitySimba
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Mbeya CitySimba
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Mbeya CitySimba

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Mbeya CitySimba
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Mbeya CitySimba
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Mbeya CitySimba

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Simba is 112% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Mbeya City · 2.12 pts / match - Simba

Mbeya City - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing
Simba - half-time state
56% leading44% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2.12
Mbeya CitySimba
0.46Goals scored (1st half)1.04
Mbeya CitySimba
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.24
Mbeya CitySimba
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.28
Mbeya CitySimba
46%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Mbeya CitySimba
58%No goal before half-time32%
Mbeya CitySimba

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)2
Mbeya CitySimba
0.31Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Mbeya CitySimba
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
Mbeya CitySimba
1Average goals (2nd half)0.96
Mbeya CitySimba
50%Clean sheet after half-time84%
Mbeya CitySimba
77%No goal after half-time44%
Mbeya CitySimba

Mbeya City - second-half results

19% W35% D46% L
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Simba - second-half results

56% W32% D12% L
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mbeya City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Simba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.60
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mbeya City
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
6
7
16-30
3
10
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
7
61-75
2
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Simba
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
7
2
16-30
11
3
31-45
3
3
46-60
9
0
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mbeya City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Simba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
212%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Mbeya CityLigaSimba
Average goals in match 2.272.14 2.24
Both teams scored 35%36% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%39% 52%
Clean sheets 27%39% 64%
Goal before half-time 69%60% 68%
Goal after half-time 65%63% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.14
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
0.85
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mbeya City 0 - 0 - 1 Simba. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Simba
3 : 0
Mbeya City

FAQ

What was the result of Mbeya City vs Simba?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mbeya City 0:1 Simba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mbeya City vs Simba?

Mbeya City score 0.77 goals per game on average and Simba 1.80. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Mbeya City's matches and 32% of Simba's.

What form are Mbeya City and Simba in?

Over the last 5 games Mbeya City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Simba 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mbeya City vs Simba?

The statistical background for Mbeya City vs Simba — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.